🙏 Free Reviews 2020
Required Founding Documents
Required Supreme Court Cases
🏛 Unit 1: Foundations of American Democracy
1.5Ratification of the U.S. Constitution
1.7Relationship Between States and the Federal Government
1.8Constitutional Interpretations of Federalism
⚖️ Unit 2: Interactions Among Branches of Government
2.0Unit 2 Overview: Interactions Among Branches of Government
2.2Structures, Powers, and Functions of Congress
2.4Roles and Power of the President
2.8The Judicial Branch
2.11Checks on the Judicial Branch
✊ Unit 3: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
3.2First Amendment: Freedom of Religion
3.6Amendments: Balancing Individual Freedom with Public Order and Safety
3.7Selective Incorporation & the 14th Amendment
3.8Amendments: Due Process and the Rights of the Accused
3.11Government Responses to Social Movements
🐘 Unit 4: American Political Ideologies and Beliefs
🗳 Unit 5: Political Participation
🧐 Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)
✍️ Free Response Questions (FRQ)
AP Gov FRQ: Argument Essay Review (2020)
FRQ: SCOTUS Application
⏱️ 2 min read
May 1, 2020
When the Supreme Court's decisions are controversial or unpopular, the other branches may question the Court's legitimacy and take actions to curb its influence. Every year, the Supreme Court hands down decisions on cases that affect the lives of millions of people. It strikes down laws that elected members of Congress enacted 🙅♀️, often with the clear mandate of their constituents. Or, conversely, the Court might uphold a law—perhaps one enacted by the legislature of a small state—that the majority of Americans dislike.
Because the Supreme Court justices have life tenure, they have the freedom to judge the constitutionality of laws without needing to please the public 🥺 to retain their seats.
The Framers designed the structure of the Court this way to insulate it from the whims of the majority, but sometimes Court decisions are so unpopular or controversial that Congress and the President take, or threaten to take, court-curbing measures.
Court-curbing measures are strategies for reducing the power of the Supreme Court or the impact of its rulings. These include: future appointments, legislation changing the Court’s jurisdiction, and refusing to implement decisions.
Presidents can change the ideological composition ⚖️ of the Supreme Court by appointing new justices who share their interpretations of the Constitution. Sometimes presidents have even suggested altering the number of justices sitting on the Court so they could shift the balance of votes in favor of their policies.
Article III of the Constitution gives Congress the power to establish and abolish inferior courts, and the ability to determine the Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction (its role as a court of appeals for lower courts). Congress may pass acts that prevent the Supreme Court from hearing appeals in certain types of cases.
The Supreme Court relies on the president to enforce its will; if presidents disagree with a decision they may do as little as possible to enforce the decision, or in rare cases ignore a decision altogether.
For example, the Supreme Court struck down Abraham Lincoln’s decision to suspend habeas corpus during the Civil War, but he continued the policy with Congress’s approval.
Although the Court is independent, there is some evidence to suggest that the Justices aren’t entirely immune to outside opinion .
Legal scholars have noted that to maintain its legitimacy in the eyes of the public, justices are careful not to give the appearance of favoring one political party over another by ruling too often for or against liberal or conservative policies.
🎥 Watch: AP GOPO - US Supreme Court
2550 north lake drive
milwaukee, wi 53211
92% of Fiveable students earned a 3 or higher on their 2020 AP Exams.
*ap® and advanced placement® are registered trademarks of the college board, which was not involved in the production of, and does not endorse, this product.
© fiveable 2020 | all rights reserved.