Join our community

Learn Morecaret down

caret down

Join our community

Fiveable Community students are already meeting new friends, starting study groups, and sharing tons of opportunities for other high schoolers. Soon the Fiveable Community will be on a totally new platform where you can share, save, and organize your learning links and lead study groups among other students! 🎉

group of students
group of students

ap gov study guides

⚖️  Unit 2: Interactions Among Branches of Government

🗳  Unit 5: Political Participation

2.11 Checks on the Judicial Branch

#interactionsamongbranchesofgovernment

⏱️  2 min read

written by

samantha howey


Two key characteristics of the Supreme Court—its practice of judicial review, and its Justices’ life tenure—can lead to debate over the legitimacy of the Court’s power, as well as attempts by the other branches to challenge and limit that power.

Activism vs. Restraint

The debate over judicial activism and judicial restraint is a key issue in discussions around the power of the Supreme Court.

Some Justices favor a policy of judicial restraint 🤓, viewing their role as strict interpreters of precedent and the Constitution, and deferring decisions that impact policy making to the other elected branches of government.

But, other Justices believe in judicial activism 😎: that the Court should be bolder in upholding rights that may not be explicitly stated in the Constitution, and in striking down legislation that infringes those rights.

Checks on the Supreme Court

With a controversial ruling by the Court, the other branches may challenge its legitimacy and power, questioning either the Court’s right to exercise judicial review or the appropriateness of its Justices’ life tenures 👵🧓.

Both the legislative and executive branches can also employ checks that can limit the Court’s power, for example, via the nomination and confirmation of Justices.

Nominations

In the event of a vacancy, the president is likely to nominate a Justice with whom they are at least somewhat ideologically aligned, which may in turn alter the ideological balance of the Court and decrease the likelihood of future majority opinions that conflict with the views of the president’s party.

Because federal judges serve life terms, these appointments can have long-lasting impacts after a president has left office.

Congress

Congress can pass legislation to attempt to limit the Court’s power by:

  • changing the Court’s jurisdiction

  • modifying the impact of a Court decision after it has been made

  • amending the Constitution in relation to the Court

The president (and the states) may also choose to evade or ignore a Court decision; while not very common, this approach has been used in the past following some unpopular rulings.

🎥 Watch: AP GOPO - Roles and Functions of the Supreme Court

continue learning

Slide 1 of 17
Fiveable

Join Our Community

Fiveable Community students are already meeting new friends, starting study groups, and sharing tons of opportunities for other high schoolers. Soon the Fiveable Community will be on a totally new platform where you can share, save, and organize your learning links and lead study groups among other students!🎉

Fiveable Logo

2550 north lake drive
suite 2
milwaukee, wi 53211

92% of Fiveable students earned a 3 or higher on their 2020 AP Exams.

*ap® and advanced placement® are registered trademarks of the college board, which was not involved in the production of, and does not endorse, this product.

© fiveable 2020 | all rights reserved.