Fiveable

Calculus II Unit 5 Review

QR code for Calculus II practice questions

5.5 Alternating Series

5.5 Alternating Series

Written by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated August 2025
Written by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated August 2025
Calculus II
Unit & Topic Study Guides

Alternating Series

An alternating series has terms that flip between positive and negative. What makes these series interesting is that the cancellation between positive and negative terms can cause a series to converge even when the absolute values of its terms form a divergent series. That distinction between absolute and conditional convergence is one of the central ideas in this section.

Alternating Series Test (Leibniz Test)

The Alternating Series Test gives you a straightforward way to confirm convergence for series whose terms alternate in sign. An alternating series takes one of these forms, where bn>0b_n > 0 for all nn:

n=1(1)n1bnorn=1(1)nbn\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n-1} b_n \quad \text{or} \quad \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n} b_n

To apply the test, check three conditions:

  1. The terms alternate in sign. The series contains the factor (1)n(-1)^n or (1)n1(-1)^{n-1}.
  2. The sequence {bn}\{b_n\} is eventually decreasing. That is, bn+1bnb_{n+1} \leq b_n for all nn beyond some point. The magnitudes of the terms shrink (or at least don't grow).
  3. limnbn=0\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n = 0. The terms approach zero.

If all three conditions hold, the series converges.

Note that this test only tells you the series converges. It doesn't tell you what it converges to. Sometimes you can find the sum (for example, n=1(1)n1n=ln(2)\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n} = \ln(2)), but often there's no neat closed form.

When is this test useful? It's your go-to when the ratio and root tests are inconclusive. For instance, n=1(1)n1n\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{\sqrt{n}} can't be handled by the ratio test, but the Alternating Series Test confirms convergence quickly: 1n\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} is decreasing and approaches 0.

Common mistake: If limnbn0\lim_{n \to \infty} b_n \neq 0, the series diverges by the Divergence Test. But if bn0b_n \to 0 and the sequence is not eventually decreasing, the Alternating Series Test simply doesn't apply. That doesn't automatically mean the series diverges; you'd need another method.

Alternating series test application, Alternating Series · Calculus

Sum Estimation and Error Bounds

One of the best features of convergent alternating series is that you get a built-in error bound when approximating the sum with a partial sum.

The partial sum SnS_n adds up the first nn terms:

Sn=k=1n(1)k1bkS_n = \sum_{k=1}^{n} (-1)^{k-1} b_k

The Alternating Series Estimation Theorem says the error from stopping at SnS_n is bounded by the absolute value of the very next term:

SSnbn+1|S - S_n| \leq b_{n+1}

This is remarkably useful. Here's how to apply it in practice:

  1. Decide how much error you can tolerate (say, error < 0.01).
  2. Find the smallest nn such that bn+1<0.01b_{n+1} < 0.01.
  3. Compute SnS_n. Your approximation is guaranteed to be within 0.01 of the true sum.

Example: For n=1(1)n1n\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n}, the partial sum S5=112+1314+15S_5 = 1 - \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{5} has error SS5160.167|S - S_5| \leq \frac{1}{6} \approx 0.167. If you need better accuracy, take more terms: S10S_{10} has error at most 1110.091\frac{1}{11} \approx 0.091.

There's another useful geometric fact: the true sum SS always lies between any two consecutive partial sums SnS_n and Sn+1S_{n+1}. The partial sums oscillate around the true value, alternately overshooting and undershooting it.

Alternating series test application, real analysis - Convergence of Alternating harmonic series (Direct!) - Mathematics Stack Exchange

Absolute vs. Conditional Convergence

This distinction matters a lot, and it comes up frequently on exams.

Absolute convergence: A series an\sum a_n converges absolutely if an\sum |a_n| also converges. You're stripping away the alternating signs and asking whether the series still converges.

  • Example: n=1(1)n1n2\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^2} converges absolutely because 1n2\sum \frac{1}{n^2} is a convergent p-series (p=2>1p = 2 > 1).

Conditional convergence: A series an\sum a_n converges conditionally if it converges, but an\sum |a_n| diverges. The alternating signs are doing all the work.

  • Example: n=1(1)n1n\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n} converges by the Alternating Series Test, but 1n\sum \frac{1}{n} is the harmonic series, which diverges. So this series converges only conditionally.

Testing an alternating series for convergence type

  1. Apply the Alternating Series Test. If the series doesn't converge, you're done.
  2. If it converges, take absolute values and test an\sum |a_n| using any appropriate test (p-series, comparison, ratio, etc.).
  3. If an\sum |a_n| converges, the original series is absolutely convergent.
  4. If an\sum |a_n| diverges, the original series is conditionally convergent.

Why does this matter? Absolute convergence is the stronger condition. An absolutely convergent series can have its terms rearranged in any order without changing the sum. A conditionally convergent series is fragile: the Riemann Rearrangement Theorem says you can rearrange its terms to converge to any real number, or even to diverge. That's a striking difference.