Glossary

Metanarratives are grand stories that explain reality, history, and human experience. They provide overarching frameworks for understanding the world, claiming universal truth and legitimizing certain forms of knowledge while marginalizing others.

Postmodern thinkers challenge metanarratives, arguing they're oppressive and totalizing. They favor that reflect diverse experiences. Literature can reinforce or subvert metanarratives, shaping cultural identity and social structures.

Definition of metanarrative

  • In literary theory and criticism, a refers to an overarching story or narrative that provides a comprehensive explanation or interpretation of reality, history, or human experience
  • Metanarratives are grand, all-encompassing narratives that seek to explain and legitimize knowledge, beliefs, and social practices within a particular cultural or historical context
  • The concept of metanarrative is closely associated with the work of , a prominent postmodern philosopher who critiqued the notion of grand narratives in his book "" (1979)

Characteristics of metanarratives

Overarching explanatory framework

Top images from around the web for Overarching explanatory framework

  • Pragmatism, Critical Theory and Post-structuralism | Flickr View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Frontiers | How Could Children’s Storybooks Promote Empathy? A Conceptual Framework Based on ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Pragmatism, Critical Theory and Post-structuralism | Flickr View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Overarching explanatory framework

  • Pragmatism, Critical Theory and Post-structuralism | Flickr View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Frontiers | How Could Children’s Storybooks Promote Empathy? A Conceptual Framework Based on ... View original

    Is this image relevant?

  • Pragmatism, Critical Theory and Post-structuralism | Flickr View original

    Is this image relevant?

1 of 3
  • Metanarratives provide a comprehensive framework for understanding and interpreting the world, offering a unified explanation for diverse phenomena and experiences
  • They attempt to organize and make sense of complex realities by subsuming them under a single, all-encompassing narrative structure
  • Metanarratives often present a teleological view of history, suggesting that events and developments are part of a purposeful, progressive trajectory (Marxism, Christian salvation history)

Claims of universal truth

  • Metanarratives assert their validity and applicability across different cultures, societies, and historical periods, claiming to represent universal truths or absolute knowledge
  • They tend to marginalize or exclude alternative perspectives, narratives, or forms of knowledge that do not fit within their overarching framework
  • Metanarratives often rely on binary oppositions (good vs. evil, civilized vs. primitive) to reinforce their claims of universal truth and legitimacy

Legitimization of knowledge

  • Metanarratives serve to legitimize certain forms of knowledge, beliefs, and practices while delegitimizing others
  • They establish criteria for determining what counts as valid or legitimate knowledge within a particular cultural or historical context
  • Metanarratives often rely on the authority of institutions (religion, science, the state) to validate and disseminate their claims

Functions of metanarratives

Providing meaning and purpose

  • Metanarratives offer individuals and societies a sense of meaning, purpose, and coherence in the face of complex, often chaotic realities
  • They provide a framework for understanding one's place in the world and the significance of individual and collective experiences
  • Metanarratives can inspire a sense of shared identity, values, and goals, fostering social cohesion and a sense of belonging

Shaping cultural identity

  • Metanarratives play a crucial role in shaping and maintaining cultural identities, defining the boundaries and characteristics of particular communities or societies
  • They offer a set of shared stories, myths, and symbols that individuals can identify with and use to construct their sense of self and belonging
  • Metanarratives often reinforce cultural norms, values, and traditions, ensuring the continuity and stability of social structures and practices

Justifying social structures

  • Metanarratives can be used to justify and legitimize existing social structures, power relations, and hierarchies
  • They provide a rationale for the distribution of resources, privileges, and opportunities within a society, often naturalizing or essentializing social inequalities
  • Metanarratives may be employed by dominant groups to maintain their power and suppress challenges to the status quo

Examples of metanarratives

Religious metanarratives

  • Many religious traditions offer metanarratives that explain the origin, purpose, and ultimate fate of the universe and humanity
  • Christian metanarrative of creation, fall, redemption, and salvation
  • Islamic metanarrative of submission to Allah and the establishment of a just society based on Quranic principles
  • Hindu metanarrative of the cyclical nature of existence, reincarnation, and the ultimate goal of moksha (liberation)

Political metanarratives

  • Political ideologies often function as metanarratives, providing a comprehensive framework for understanding and organizing society
  • Marxist metanarrative of class struggle, the overthrow of capitalism, and the establishment of a communist utopia
  • Liberal metanarrative of progress, individual freedom, and the triumph of reason and democracy
  • Fascist metanarrative of national rebirth, racial purity, and the supremacy of the state

Scientific metanarratives

  • Science has often been associated with metanarratives of progress, rationality, and the triumph of human reason over nature
  • Enlightenment metanarrative of the power of scientific knowledge to improve the human condition and achieve mastery over the natural world
  • Evolutionary metanarrative of the gradual development and improvement of species through natural selection
  • Technological metanarrative of the transformative power of innovation and the inevitability of technological progress

Postmodern critique of metanarratives

Skepticism toward grand narratives

  • Postmodern thinkers, such as Jean-François Lyotard, challenge the legitimacy and universality of metanarratives, arguing that they are inherently totalizing and oppressive
  • Postmodernists reject the notion of a single, overarching truth or narrative that can explain all aspects of reality or human experience
  • They emphasize the contingent, contextual nature of knowledge and the multiplicity of perspectives and interpretations

Emphasis on local narratives

  • Postmodern theory valorizes local, particular narratives that emerge from specific cultural, historical, and social contexts
  • It celebrates the diversity and plurality of human experiences, identities, and forms of knowledge, resisting the homogenizing tendencies of metanarratives
  • Postmodernists argue that local narratives can provide more authentic, nuanced, and empowering accounts of reality than grand narratives

Deconstruction of metanarratives

  • Postmodern thinkers employ various strategies, such as deconstruction, to expose the contradictions, biases, and power relations embedded in metanarratives
  • Deconstruction involves close reading and analysis of texts to uncover the hidden assumptions, binary oppositions, and hierarchies that underlie their apparent meaning
  • By deconstructing metanarratives, postmodernists seek to destabilize their authority and open up space for alternative, marginalized narratives

Impact of metanarratives on literature

Reinforcement of dominant ideologies

  • Literature can serve as a vehicle for disseminating and reinforcing dominant metanarratives, perpetuating the values, beliefs, and power structures of a particular society or culture
  • Literary works that conform to prevailing metanarratives may be celebrated, canonized, and widely disseminated, while those that challenge or subvert them may be marginalized or suppressed
  • The literary canon itself can be seen as a product of dominant metanarratives, privileging certain forms of expression, genres, and authors over others

Marginalization of alternative narratives

  • Metanarratives can contribute to the marginalization or exclusion of alternative narratives, perspectives, and experiences that do not fit within their overarching framework
  • Literature that represents the experiences of marginalized groups (women, racial and ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals) may be dismissed, devalued, or ignored by dominant cultural institutions
  • The dominance of certain metanarratives can limit the range of stories, voices, and forms of expression that are deemed legitimate or worthy of attention in the literary world

Subversion and resistance in literature

  • Some literary works deliberately challenge, subvert, or resist dominant metanarratives, offering alternative perspectives and narratives that destabilize their authority
  • Postcolonial literature, for example, often seeks to deconstruct and rewrite the metanarratives of colonialism, asserting the validity and value of indigenous cultures and experiences
  • Feminist literature challenges patriarchal metanarratives, exposing the ways in which they marginalize and oppress women, and proposing alternative narratives of female empowerment and agency
  • Avant-garde and experimental literature may reject the conventions and assumptions of dominant literary metanarratives, pushing the boundaries of form, language, and meaning

Metanarratives vs local narratives

Universality vs particularity

  • Metanarratives claim universal applicability and validity, presenting themselves as all-encompassing explanations of reality that transcend cultural, historical, and individual differences
  • Local narratives, in contrast, emphasize the particular, context-specific nature of knowledge and experience, recognizing the diversity and multiplicity of human perspectives and interpretations
  • While metanarratives seek to subsume differences under a single, totalizing framework, local narratives celebrate and affirm the value of difference, plurality, and specificity

Totalization vs fragmentation

  • Metanarratives aim to provide a comprehensive, unified account of reality, history, or human experience, often at the expense of complexity, nuance, and contradiction
  • Local narratives, on the other hand, embrace fragmentation, incompleteness, and multiplicity, acknowledging the inherently partial, situated nature of all knowledge and representation
  • While metanarratives strive for coherence and closure, local narratives remain open-ended, provisional, and subject to ongoing negotiation and revision

Legitimacy vs subjectivity

  • Metanarratives derive their legitimacy from claims to objective, universal truth, often relying on the authority of institutions, traditions, or foundational principles
  • Local narratives, in contrast, emphasize the subjective, experiential nature of knowledge and meaning, recognizing the role of individual and collective interpretation in shaping our understanding of the world
  • While metanarratives seek to establish a single, authoritative version of reality, local narratives acknowledge the coexistence of multiple, sometimes conflicting, truths and perspectives

Role of literature in metanarratives

Literature as cultural expression

  • Literature serves as a powerful medium for expressing and transmitting the values, beliefs, and narratives that shape a particular culture or society
  • Literary works can reflect, reinforce, or challenge the dominant metanarratives of their time, providing insight into the prevailing cultural assumptions, anxieties, and aspirations
  • The study of literature can help us understand the ways in which metanarratives are constructed, disseminated, and contested within specific cultural and historical contexts

Literature as ideological tool

  • Literature can be used as a tool for propagating and legitimizing dominant ideologies and metanarratives, shaping the way individuals and societies perceive and interpret reality
  • Literary works that conform to prevailing metanarratives may be promoted, celebrated, and widely disseminated, serving to reinforce and naturalize the power structures and social hierarchies of a particular society
  • The literary canon itself can be seen as an ideological construct, reflecting the values and interests of dominant cultural groups and institutions

Literature as site of contestation

  • Literature can also serve as a site of contestation, where competing metanarratives, ideologies, and perspectives come into conflict and negotiation
  • Literary works that challenge or subvert dominant metanarratives can create spaces for alternative voices, experiences, and forms of knowledge to emerge and gain visibility
  • The interpretation and reception of literary texts can become a battleground for competing metanarratives, as readers, critics, and scholars engage in ongoing debates over meaning, value, and significance
  • Postcolonial, feminist, and other forms of resistant literature deliberately contest and rewrite the metanarratives of colonialism, patriarchy, and other oppressive systems, asserting the validity and value of marginalized perspectives and experiences

Key Terms to Review (13)

Anti-Oedipus: Anti-Oedipus is a philosophical work by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari that critiques traditional psychoanalytic interpretations of desire and family dynamics, particularly the Oedipus complex. The text argues for a non-linear understanding of desire, promoting a view that sees it as productive and expansive rather than repressive, challenging the dominant narratives of identity and subjectivity that are often derived from psychoanalysis.
Cultural Hegemony: Cultural hegemony refers to the dominance of one cultural group over others, shaping societal norms, values, and beliefs in a way that promotes the interests of the ruling class. This concept helps to understand how certain ideologies become mainstream and how power dynamics influence cultural narratives, often leading to the acceptance of these dominant ideologies as 'common sense' or 'natural.'
Deconstruction of metanarratives: The deconstruction of metanarratives refers to the critical approach that challenges and dismantles overarching, universal explanations or narratives that claim to provide absolute truths about history, culture, or knowledge. This concept emphasizes the complexity and plurality of perspectives, revealing how these grand narratives often exclude marginalized voices and experiences. By questioning the authority and legitimacy of such narratives, this approach promotes a more nuanced understanding of reality and encourages the acceptance of multiple interpretations.
Enlightenment Narrative: The Enlightenment narrative refers to a historical and philosophical framework that emphasizes reason, science, and individualism as foundational principles for understanding human existence and societal progress. This narrative often posits that through rational thought and empirical investigation, humanity can achieve enlightenment, leading to advancements in knowledge, ethics, and governance, which in turn foster social and political reform.
Friedrich Nietzsche: Friedrich Nietzsche was a German philosopher known for his critique of traditional morality, religion, and the concept of truth, promoting ideas like the 'will to power' and the 'Übermensch.' His thoughts challenge metanarratives by emphasizing individual perspectives and experiences over universal truths. Nietzsche's emphasis on fragmentation resonates with postmodernist ideas that reject grand narratives, suggesting that meaning is constructed rather than inherent.
Grand narrative: A grand narrative, also known as a metanarrative, refers to overarching stories or theories that attempt to provide comprehensive explanations of historical events, social phenomena, or cultural practices. These narratives often claim universal validity and attempt to encompass various human experiences under one coherent framework, shaping how societies understand their past and present.
Identity formation: Identity formation is the process through which individuals develop their sense of self, influenced by social, cultural, and personal factors. This ongoing journey reflects how individuals navigate their relationships and experiences, often shaped by their environments, including aspects such as ethnicity, sexuality, and ideology. Understanding identity formation helps to reveal the complexities of belonging and self-definition in diverse contexts.
Jean-François Lyotard: Jean-François Lyotard was a French philosopher known for his work on postmodernism and the critique of metanarratives. He argued that in a postmodern society, grand narratives or overarching stories that claim to explain historical events and cultural phenomena have lost their credibility, leading to a more fragmented view of truth and knowledge.
Local Narratives: Local narratives refer to the stories and accounts that emerge from specific communities, cultures, or contexts, often highlighting their unique experiences and perspectives. These narratives serve as a counterpoint to broader, overarching stories known as metanarratives, which tend to generalize or universalize human experiences. Local narratives provide depth, diversity, and a sense of belonging, allowing marginalized voices to be heard and recognized within the larger societal discourse.
Metanarrative: A metanarrative is a grand, overarching story or theory that seeks to explain and legitimize various smaller narratives within a culture or society. It provides a framework through which individuals can understand their experiences and the world around them, often shaping ideologies and beliefs. Metanarratives often reflect dominant cultural values and can serve to marginalize alternative perspectives.
Postmodernism and Metanarratives: Postmodernism is a complex cultural, intellectual, and artistic movement that emerged in the mid-20th century, characterized by skepticism toward grand narratives or metanarratives that claim to explain all aspects of human experience. It challenges the idea of a singular, objective truth and emphasizes the relativity of knowledge, identity, and meaning, promoting diverse perspectives and interpretations.
The marxist narrative: The Marxist narrative is a framework for interpreting literature and society through the lens of class struggle and economic power dynamics, focusing on how these factors shape human experiences and societal structures. It emphasizes the conflicts between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, illustrating how material conditions influence individual lives and cultural production. This perspective critiques capitalism and explores how literature reflects and perpetuates class ideologies.
The postmodern condition: The postmodern condition refers to a cultural, intellectual, and artistic state characterized by a skepticism toward grand narratives and ideologies, emphasizing fragmentation, relativism, and the blurring of boundaries between high and low culture. This condition reflects a shift in society where objective truths are questioned and individual perspectives take precedence, influencing various fields including literature, art, and philosophy.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Back
Practice QuizGlossary
Practice QuizGlossary
Next guide