3.4 Intertextuality

Intertextuality explores how texts relate to and shape each other's meanings. It challenges the idea of standalone works, suggesting all texts are interconnected mosaics of previous writings, cultural influences, and shared conventions.

This concept, introduced by Julia Kristeva in the 1960s, builds on ideas from Bakhtin and Saussure. It emphasizes texts as dialogues with other works, transforming literary traditions and producing new meanings through their relationships.

Origins of intertextuality

• Intertextuality is a key concept in literary theory that examines the relationships between texts and how they shape meaning
• The term was coined by Julia Kristeva in the 1960s, drawing on the work of other theorists and linguists
• Kristeva's formulation of intertextuality built upon the ideas of Mikhail Bakhtin and Ferdinand de Saussure, among others

Kristeva's coinage of term

Top images from around the web for Kristeva's coinage of term

• 

  Frontiers | Understanding Culture Clashes and Catalyzing Change: A Culture Cycle Approach View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Julia Kristeva p1200568.jpg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Julia Kristeva - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Understanding Culture Clashes and Catalyzing Change: A Culture Cycle Approach View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Julia Kristeva p1200568.jpg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Kristeva's coinage of term

• 

  Frontiers | Understanding Culture Clashes and Catalyzing Change: A Culture Cycle Approach View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Julia Kristeva p1200568.jpg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Julia Kristeva - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Understanding Culture Clashes and Catalyzing Change: A Culture Cycle Approach View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:Julia Kristeva p1200568.jpg - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• In her essays "Word, Dialogue, and Novel" (1966) and "The Bounded Text" (1966-67), Kristeva first introduced the term intertextuality
• Kristeva proposed that all texts are constructed as a mosaic of quotations and are the absorption and transformation of other texts
• She argued that a literary work is not an isolated entity but a compilation of cultural textuality

Bakhtin's influence on Kristeva

• Kristeva's notion of intertextuality was heavily influenced by Bakhtin's concepts of dialogism and heteroglossia
• Bakhtin posited that all language is inherently dialogic, meaning that it is always in dialogue with other utterances and voices
• Heteroglossia refers to the coexistence of multiple voices, styles, and perspectives within a single text or discourse

Saussure and semiotics

• Kristeva also drew upon the semiotic theories of Ferdinand de Saussure, particularly his ideas about the arbitrary nature of linguistic signs
• Saussure's concept of the signifier (the form of a sign) and the signified (the concept it represents) was crucial to Kristeva's understanding of intertextuality
• Kristeva extended Saussure's ideas to argue that texts are not closed systems of meaning but are open to multiple interpretations based on their relations to other texts

Key concepts of intertextuality

• Intertextuality challenges traditional notions of textual autonomy and originality, emphasizing the interconnectedness of all texts
• It suggests that the meaning of a text is not inherent within itself but is produced through its relationships with other texts and discourses
• Intertextuality operates on various levels, from explicit references and allusions to more subtle forms of influence and transformation

Texts as mosaics of quotations

• Kristeva argued that all texts are composed of "mosaics of quotations" from other texts
• This means that every text contains traces, fragments, and echoes of previous texts, whether consciously or unconsciously incorporated by the author
• The idea of texts as mosaics highlights the inherent plurality and instability of textual meaning

Texts as absorption and transformation

• Intertextuality posits that texts absorb and transform other texts in a continuous process of literary evolution
• Authors do not create entirely original works but instead build upon, rework, and respond to existing literary traditions and conventions
• This process of absorption and transformation can involve direct quotation, allusion, parody, pastiche, or more subtle forms of influence

Texts in dialogue with other texts

• Intertextuality emphasizes the dialogic nature of texts, suggesting that they are always in conversation with other texts and discourses
• This dialogue can take many forms, such as a text responding to, critiquing, or building upon the themes, styles, or ideas of another text
• The meaning of a text emerges through its intertextual relationships and the way it positions itself within a larger literary or cultural context

Intertextuality vs influence

• While the concept of literary influence also deals with the relationships between texts, it tends to focus on direct, traceable connections between authors and works
• Intertextuality, on the other hand, encompasses a broader range of textual relationships, including those that may be unconscious, indirect, or mediated through cultural codes and conventions
• Intertextuality shifts the focus from author-centered models of influence to the complex web of textual relations that shape literary meaning

Intertextuality vs allusion

• Allusion is a specific type of intertextual reference, usually a brief, explicit evocation of another text within a literary work
• While allusions are one form of intertextuality, the concept of intertextuality encompasses a much wider range of textual relationships and strategies
• Intertextuality includes not only direct references but also more subtle, pervasive ways in which texts are shaped by their relations to other texts and discourses

Types of intertextuality

• Intertextuality can manifest in various forms, depending on the nature and extent of the textual relationships involved
• These types of intertextuality are not mutually exclusive and often overlap or interact within a single text
• Recognizing different forms of intertextuality can help readers and critics analyze the complex ways in which texts relate to one another and produce meaning

Explicit vs implicit intertextuality

• Explicit intertextuality involves direct, overt references to other texts, such as quotations, allusions, or citations
• Implicit intertextuality, on the other hand, involves more subtle, indirect relationships between texts, such as shared themes, styles, or conventions
• Explicit intertextuality is easier to identify and analyze, while implicit intertextuality requires a deeper understanding of the literary and cultural context

Horizontal vs vertical intertextuality

• Horizontal intertextuality refers to relationships between texts that are more or less contemporaneous, often within the same genre or literary tradition
• Vertical intertextuality involves relationships between a text and other texts from different time periods or cultural contexts
• Horizontal intertextuality can help situate a text within its immediate literary context, while vertical intertextuality can reveal the ways in which texts engage with and transform literary traditions over time

Obligatory vs optional intertextuality

• Obligatory intertextuality refers to textual relationships that are essential for understanding the meaning or significance of a text
• Optional intertextuality involves textual relationships that enrich or expand the meaning of a text but are not strictly necessary for comprehension
• The distinction between obligatory and optional intertextuality can vary depending on the reader's literary and cultural knowledge

Specific vs generic intertextuality

• Specific intertextuality involves references or allusions to a particular text or author
• Generic intertextuality involves relationships between a text and the conventions, themes, or styles associated with a particular genre or literary tradition
• Specific intertextuality can help situate a text within a particular literary or cultural context, while generic intertextuality can reveal the ways in which texts engage with and transform broader literary categories and conventions

Intertextuality in literary analysis

• Intertextuality has become a key tool for literary analysis, enabling critics to explore the complex relationships between texts and the ways in which they produce meaning
• By examining intertextual connections, critics can situate texts within broader literary, cultural, and historical contexts
• Intertextual analysis can also reveal the ways in which texts challenge, subvert, or transform established literary conventions and traditions

Identifying intertextual references

• The first step in intertextual analysis is to identify the various intertextual references and connections within a text
• This can involve recognizing explicit references, such as quotations or allusions, as well as more subtle forms of intertextuality, such as shared themes, motifs, or stylistic features
• Identifying intertextual references requires a broad knowledge of literature and culture, as well as close reading skills

Interpreting intertextual meaning

• Once intertextual references have been identified, the next step is to interpret their significance and meaning within the context of the text
• This involves examining how the intertextual elements function within the text, how they relate to its themes, characters, or narrative structure
• Interpreting intertextual meaning also requires considering the cultural, historical, and literary contexts in which the text was produced and received

Intertextuality and literary genres

• Intertextuality plays a crucial role in the formation and evolution of literary genres
• Genres are often defined by shared conventions, themes, and styles, which are transmitted and transformed through intertextual relationships
• Examining intertextuality within and across genres can reveal the ways in which literary traditions develop, change, and interact over time

Intertextuality and literary periods

• Intertextuality can also help illuminate the characteristics and concerns of specific literary periods or movements
• By examining the intertextual relationships between texts from a particular period, critics can identify shared preoccupations, aesthetic principles, and cultural influences
• Intertextual analysis can also reveal how literary periods respond to and transform the traditions of earlier eras

Intertextuality and authorial intention

• While intertextuality emphasizes the role of the reader in producing textual meaning, it does not necessarily discount the importance of authorial intention
• Examining an author's intertextual strategies can provide insight into their creative process, literary influences, and intended meanings
• However, intertextuality also recognizes that authorial intention is not the sole determinant of a text's meaning and that texts can generate multiple, often conflicting interpretations based on their intertextual relations

Intertextuality in other disciplines

• While intertextuality originated as a concept in literary theory, it has since been adopted and adapted by scholars in various other fields
• Intertextual approaches have proved particularly productive in disciplines that deal with cultural texts and their relationships to broader social, political, and historical contexts
• By examining intertextual connections across different media and cultural forms, scholars can gain new insights into the ways in which meaning is produced, circulated, and contested

Intertextuality in film and media studies

• Film and media scholars have applied the concept of intertextuality to explore the relationships between films, television shows, and other media texts
• Intertextual analysis can reveal how media texts draw upon, adapt, or subvert the conventions and tropes of particular genres, styles, or narrative forms
• Examining intertextuality in film and media can also shed light on the ways in which these texts engage with broader cultural discourses and ideologies

Intertextuality in cultural studies

• Cultural studies scholars have used intertextuality to examine the relationships between various cultural forms, such as literature, film, music, and popular culture
• Intertextual analysis can help reveal the ways in which cultural texts reflect, shape, and contest dominant social values, norms, and power structures
• By examining intertextual connections across different cultural spheres, scholars can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the complex dynamics of cultural production and reception

Intertextuality in postcolonial studies

• Postcolonial scholars have employed intertextuality to explore the ways in which colonial and postcolonial texts interact with and challenge Western literary and cultural traditions
• Intertextual analysis can reveal how postcolonial writers appropriate, subvert, or transform the language, forms, and themes of colonial discourse
• Examining intertextuality in postcolonial contexts can also shed light on the ways in which texts negotiate issues of cultural identity, hybridity, and resistance

Intertextuality in feminist studies

• Feminist scholars have used intertextuality to examine the ways in which texts reflect and shape gender roles, identities, and power relations
• Intertextual analysis can reveal how texts engage with, reproduce, or challenge dominant patriarchal discourses and ideologies
• By examining intertextual connections across different historical periods and cultural contexts, feminist scholars can trace the evolution of gender representations and the ways in which women writers have negotiated their place within literary traditions

Critiques and limitations of intertextuality

• While intertextuality has become a widely influential concept in literary theory and beyond, it has also been subject to various critiques and debates
• Some scholars have raised concerns about the potentially limitless scope of intertextuality and its tendency to prioritize textual relations over other aspects of literary meaning and value
• Others have questioned the political and ethical implications of intertextual approaches, particularly in relation to issues of authorship, originality, and cultural appropriation

Accusations of textual determinism

• One critique of intertextuality is that it can lead to a form of textual determinism, suggesting that the meaning of a text is entirely determined by its relations to other texts
• This view can downplay the role of individual creativity, authorial intention, and the specific historical and cultural contexts in which texts are produced and received
• However, proponents of intertextuality argue that it does not necessarily deny the agency of authors or readers but rather highlights the complex, multi-layered nature of textual meaning

Challenges to authorial originality

• Intertextuality has also been criticized for challenging traditional notions of authorial originality and genius
• By emphasizing the ways in which texts are always in dialogue with other texts, intertextuality can seem to diminish the importance of individual creativity and innovation
• However, defenders of intertextuality argue that it does not discount originality but rather redefines it as the ability to creatively rework and transform existing literary and cultural materials

Intertextuality and the death of the author

• Some critics have linked intertextuality to the poststructuralist notion of the "death of the author," which suggests that the meaning of a text is not determined by authorial intention but by the play of language and the reader's interpretation
• While intertextuality does challenge author-centered models of literary meaning, it does not necessarily imply a complete rejection of authorship or intentionality
• Instead, intertextuality can be seen as highlighting the complex, collaborative nature of literary production and the ways in which authors are themselves shaped by the texts and discourses they engage with

Intertextuality and the role of the reader

• Intertextuality also raises questions about the role and competence of the reader in producing textual meaning
• Some critics have argued that intertextual approaches can privilege readers with extensive literary and cultural knowledge, potentially excluding or marginalizing other interpretations
• However, proponents of intertextuality argue that it actually empowers readers by acknowledging their active role in constructing meaning and by inviting them to explore the multiple, often contradictory possibilities of textual interpretation

Applications of intertextuality

• Beyond its theoretical and analytical implications, intertextuality has also had significant practical applications in various fields of cultural production
• Intertextual strategies have been widely employed by writers, filmmakers, and artists to create new works that engage with and transform existing cultural materials
• Examining the intertextual dimensions of these works can provide insight into the creative process and the ways in which cultural producers negotiate their relationship to literary and artistic traditions

Intertextuality in creative writing

• Many contemporary writers deliberately employ intertextual strategies in their work, such as allusion, parody, pastiche, or adaptation
• Intertextual references can serve various functions, such as paying homage to literary predecessors, subverting or critiquing established conventions, or creating new layers of meaning and interpretation
• Analyzing the intertextual dimensions of a literary work can help readers appreciate the author's creative engagement with literary history and the ways in which they position themselves within or against particular traditions

Intertextuality in literary adaptations

• Literary adaptations, such as film or stage adaptations of novels or plays, are inherently intertextual, as they involve the translation of a text from one medium to another
• Intertextual analysis can reveal how adaptations negotiate the challenges of fidelity and creativity, how they interpret and transform the source material, and how they engage with the cultural contexts of both the original text and the adaptation
• Examining intertextuality in adaptations can also shed light on the ways in which different media and genres shape the production and reception of cultural texts

Intertextuality in fan fiction

• Fan fiction is a form of creative writing that explicitly engages with existing cultural texts, such as novels, films, or television shows
• By writing stories that expand, modify, or subvert the original text, fan fiction writers participate in a form of intertextual dialogue that blurs the boundaries between producers and consumers of cultural content
• Analyzing intertextuality in fan fiction can provide insight into the ways in which audiences actively interpret and transform cultural texts, as well as the social and political implications of these practices

Intertextuality in digital media

• The rise of digital media has created new opportunities for intertextual creation and interaction, such as hypertext fiction, multimedia art, or online fan communities
• Digital intertextuality can involve the integration of various media forms, such as text, image, sound, and video, as well as the creation of non-linear, interactive narratives that invite reader participation
• Examining intertextuality in digital contexts can shed light on the ways in which new technologies are transforming the production, circulation, and reception of cultural texts, as well as the social and political implications of these changes