Political cultures shape how citizens view and interact with their government. This topic explores different types of political cultures, from participatory to parochial, and examines how they vary across regions. It highlights the factors that influence political cultures, including history, religion, and socioeconomic conditions.

Globalization has both converged and diverged political cultures worldwide. The chapter analyzes how technology, social movements, and global governance impact political values. It also discusses the benefits and limitations of comparing political cultures, emphasizing the importance of using both qualitative and quantitative approaches for a comprehensive understanding.

Political Cultures Across Regions

Types of Political Cultures

Top images from around the web for Types of Political Cultures
Top images from around the web for Types of Political Cultures
  • Countries can be broadly categorized into different types of political cultures, such as participant, subject, or parochial, based on the level of citizen involvement and awareness of politics
    • Participant political cultures have high levels of citizen engagement and a strong sense of civic duty (United States, United Kingdom)
    • Subject political cultures have limited citizen involvement and a more passive acceptance of government authority (China, Russia)
    • Parochial political cultures have low levels of political awareness and participation, with a focus on local rather than national issues (some traditional societies in Africa and Asia)
  • However, most countries exhibit a mix of these ideal types, with different aspects of their political culture falling into different categories
  • Political culture refers to the shared values, beliefs, norms, and attitudes that shape political behavior within a society
    • It provides the underlying framework for how citizens view the political system, their role within it, and what they expect from government

Regional Variations in Political Culture

  • The United States is often characterized as having an individualistic political culture that values personal liberty, limited government, and private enterprise
    • This reflects the country's historical emphasis on individual rights, free markets, and a skepticism of centralized authority
  • In contrast, many European countries lean towards a more collectivist political culture that emphasizes social welfare, economic regulation, and the common good
    • This is reflected in the strong welfare states, labor unions, and social democratic parties found in countries like Sweden, Germany, and France
  • Confucian-influenced societies in East Asia, such as China, Japan, and South Korea, have political cultures that stress hierarchy, deference to authority, consensus-building, and the subordination of individual interests to the group or state
    • These values are rooted in the Confucian tradition of filial piety, social harmony, and the importance of education and meritocracy
  • Latin American countries share some common cultural traits, such as a strong Catholic influence and a history of authoritarianism, but there is significant diversity in their political cultures
    • Costa Rica has a long tradition of democracy, with a stable two-party system and high levels of voter turnout
    • Cuba has a one-party communist system, with a strong emphasis on social equality and national sovereignty
  • Middle Eastern countries are predominantly Muslim, but there is a wide spectrum of political cultures, ranging from theocratic Iran to more secular Turkey
    • Iran has an Islamic republican system, with a powerful clergy and a strong anti-Western orientation
    • Turkey has a secular democratic system, with a history of military intervention and a recent trend towards Islamic populism
    • Lebanon has a complex power-sharing arrangement among different religious and ethnic groups, reflecting its diverse and fragmented political culture

Factors Shaping Political Cultures

Historical and Religious Influences

  • A country's historical experience, particularly its colonial legacy or revolutionary origins, can have a profound impact on its political culture
    • The British colonial influence is still evident in the parliamentary systems and common law traditions of many Commonwealth countries (India, Australia, Canada)
    • The legacy of the American and French Revolutions is reflected in the emphasis on individual rights, popular sovereignty, and separation of powers in their respective political cultures
  • Religious beliefs and values often play a significant role in shaping political culture
    • The Protestant work ethic and individualism have been linked to the development of capitalism and democracy in Western Europe and North America
    • The Catholic Church's social teachings have influenced the welfare state and Christian democratic parties in many European and Latin American countries
    • Islamic values and laws have shaped the political cultures of many Middle Eastern and North African countries, with varying degrees of secularism and religious influence

Socioeconomic and Demographic Factors

  • The level of economic development and modernization can influence political culture
    • Industrialized, post-materialist societies tend to prioritize self-expression values and participatory democracy (Sweden, Switzerland)
    • Developing countries may focus more on economic growth and political stability, with a stronger emphasis on traditional values and authority (Nigeria, Pakistan)
  • The educational system and media environment can socialize citizens into a particular political culture by transmitting knowledge, values, and norms about politics
    • Civic education and a free press can foster a more informed and engaged citizenry, as in many Western democracies
    • State-controlled education and media can reinforce conformity and obedience to authority, as in some authoritarian regimes (North Korea, Cuba)
  • Generational change and demographic shifts can gradually transform political culture over time
    • The rise of post-war "baby boomers" in Western democracies led to a shift towards more liberal and anti-establishment values in the 1960s and 1970s
    • The growing youth bulge in many developing countries is reshaping attitudes towards social issues, , and globalization (Middle East, Africa)
  • Traumatic events or crises, such as wars, depressions, or pandemics, can disrupt existing political cultures and create opportunities for new values and norms to emerge
    • The Great Depression led to the rise of social welfare policies and Keynesian economics in many Western countries
    • The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged individualistic and libertarian political cultures and highlighted the importance of collective action and social solidarity

Globalization's Impact on Political Cultures

Cultural Convergence and Divergence

  • Globalization has increased the flow of ideas, information, and values across borders, leading to a degree of cultural convergence
    • The spread of democracy, human rights, and market economies has created some common reference points for political cultures around the world
    • International organizations and agreements, such as the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, promote universal norms and standards
  • However, globalization has also triggered backlash and resistance from those who seek to defend traditional identities and values against perceived foreign influences
    • The rise of populist and nationalist movements in many countries reflects a reassertion of distinctive political cultures (Brexit in the UK, Trump in the US, Bolsonaro in Brazil)
    • Some countries have resisted Western cultural influence and asserted their own values and models, such as the "Beijing Consensus" or the "Russian World" concept

Technology and Social Movements

  • The internet and social media have accelerated the diffusion of political ideas and practices, both democratic and authoritarian
    • The Arab Spring uprisings in 2011 were facilitated by the use of Facebook and Twitter to organize protests and share information across borders
    • The global spread of the #MeToo movement against sexual harassment and the Black Lives Matter movement against racism demonstrate the power of digital platforms to mobilize political action across cultures
  • However, the internet has also been used by authoritarian governments to spread propaganda, monitor citizens, and suppress dissent
    • China's "Great Firewall" and Russia's "sovereign internet" laws aim to control the flow of information and reinforce state-sanctioned political cultures
  • Transnational migration has created more diverse and multicultural societies, challenging existing political cultures and creating new hybrid identities
    • The integration of immigrants and minorities into the political system is a major issue in many Western countries, with debates over assimilation, multiculturalism, and (France, Germany, United States)
    • Diaspora communities can also influence political cultures in their countries of origin, through remittances, cultural exchange, and political activism (Irish-Americans, Lebanese-Australians)

Global Governance and Cultural Contestation

  • Global governance institutions, such as the United Nations and the European Union, aim to promote universal norms and values, but they also face criticism for imposing Western cultural standards on other societies
    • The UN's Sustainable Development Goals and the EU's Copenhagen Criteria for membership reflect a liberal democratic vision of political culture
    • However, some countries have accused these institutions of cultural imperialism and interference in their internal affairs (China, Russia, Iran)
  • The debate over "Asian values" in the 1990s highlighted the contested nature of political culture in a globalized world
    • Leaders such as Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew and Malaysia's Mahathir Mohamad argued that Western-style democracy and human rights were not compatible with Asian cultures, which prioritized social harmony, respect for authority, and economic development
    • Critics argued that this was a self-serving justification for authoritarian rule and that there was no single "Asian" political culture
  • The rise of China as a global power has also challenged Western assumptions about the universality of liberal democracy and market capitalism
    • China's "socialist market economy" and "consultative Leninism" model offer an alternative vision of political culture that emphasizes stability, meritocracy, and collective welfare over individual rights and electoral democracy
    • The Belt and Road Initiative and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank are seen by some as tools for China to export its political and economic model to other countries

Comparative Analysis of Political Culture

Benefits and Limitations of Comparative Analysis

  • Comparative analysis allows researchers to identify similarities and differences in political cultures across countries and regions
    • By comparing cases, we can generate hypotheses about the factors that shape political culture and test them empirically
    • For example, comparing the political cultures of former British colonies (India, Nigeria, Australia) can shed light on the legacy of colonial institutions and values
  • However, comparative analysis must be sensitive to the unique historical, social, and economic contexts of each country
    • Overgeneralizing from a small sample of cases or imposing Western cultural categories on non-Western societies can lead to flawed conclusions
    • For example, the concept of "social capital" developed by Robert Putnam to explain civic engagement in Italy and the United States may not apply in the same way to other cultures with different patterns of trust and association
  • Comparative surveys, such as the World Values Survey, provide valuable data on attitudes and values across countries, but they also have limitations
    • Survey questions may not capture the full complexity of political culture, and responses may be influenced by social desirability bias or cultural differences in interpreting questions
    • For example, the meaning of "democracy" or "freedom" may vary across cultures, and surveys may not always capture these nuances

Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches

  • Qualitative methods, such as ethnography and in-depth interviews, can provide a richer understanding of how political culture is experienced and practiced in everyday life
    • These methods allow researchers to explore the meanings and motivations behind political attitudes and behaviors, and to capture the diversity and dynamism of political cultures
    • For example, Clifford Geertz's study of the Balinese cockfight as a "deep play" of status and power relations revealed important aspects of Indonesian political culture that were not captured by surveys or institutional analysis
  • However, qualitative methods are more time-consuming and may have limited generalizability beyond the specific cases studied
    • They also rely heavily on the interpretive skills and cultural sensitivity of the researcher, and may be subject to bias or misrepresentation
  • Quantitative methods, such as statistical analysis of survey data or content analysis of media sources, can provide more systematic and representative evidence of political culture patterns
    • These methods allow researchers to test hypotheses and identify correlations between cultural variables and political outcomes across a large number of cases
    • For example, Ronald Inglehart's analysis of World Values Survey data has shown a consistent pattern of value change from traditional to secular-rational and from survival to self-expression values across many countries, with important implications for democracy and economic development
  • However, quantitative methods may oversimplify complex cultural phenomena and miss important contextual factors or individual variations
    • They also depend on the reliability and validity of the data sources and measures used, which may be affected by cultural biases or measurement errors

Triangulation and Contextual Sensitivity

  • Ultimately, comparative analysis is a useful tool for understanding political culture, but it must be used carefully and in combination with other methods
    • By triangulating different sources of data (surveys, interviews, documents, observations) and different levels of analysis (individual, group, society), researchers can build a more comprehensive and nuanced picture of political culture
    • For example, Pippa Norris's study of "critical citizens" in advanced democracies used a combination of survey data, case studies, and historical analysis to show how rising levels of education and information have led to more critical attitudes towards political institutions, but not necessarily a rejection of democratic values
  • Researchers must also be attentive to the historical and cultural contexts of the cases they study, and avoid imposing universal or ethnocentric categories on diverse societies
    • This requires a deep understanding of the language, history, and social norms of each culture, as well as a reflexive awareness of one's own cultural biases and assumptions
    • For example, Lucian Pye's classic study of Asian political cultures emphasized the importance of understanding the distinctive patterns of authority, identity, and morality in each society, rather than assuming a universal model of modernization or democratization
  • By combining different methods, sources, and perspectives, and being sensitive to context and diversity, comparative analysis can provide valuable insights into the complex and dynamic nature of political culture around the world
    • It can help us understand how different societies view politics and how these views shape political behavior and institutions
    • It can also help us identify common challenges and opportunities for political development and reform across different cultures, while respecting their unique histories and identities

Key Terms to Review (19)

Almond and Verba's Typology: Almond and Verba's typology refers to a framework for understanding political culture through the categorization of political attitudes and behaviors within societies. They identified three main types of political culture: parochial, subject, and participant, each representing varying degrees of citizen involvement and awareness in political processes. This typology helps analyze how different societies engage with their political systems and the implications for governance.
Case Study Analysis: Case study analysis is a research method that involves an in-depth examination of a single case or multiple cases within a real-world context. This approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of the complexities and unique features of political systems, cultures, or behaviors, often revealing insights that are applicable to broader theoretical frameworks. By focusing on specific instances, this method can illuminate patterns, differences, and influences that shape political landscapes.
Civic culture: Civic culture refers to the set of attitudes, values, and practices that influence political behavior and foster citizen participation in political life. This concept highlights how a society's political culture can shape the stability and effectiveness of its regime, with civic culture promoting democratic engagement and contributing to the overall health of political systems.
Collectivism vs. Individualism: Collectivism and individualism are contrasting political and social philosophies that define the relationship between the individual and the group. Collectivism emphasizes the priority of the group over individual rights, advocating for collective decision-making and shared resources, while individualism prioritizes personal freedom, autonomy, and self-reliance. These concepts influence various political cultures and determine how societies balance the needs of the community with the rights of individuals.
Cross-national comparison: Cross-national comparison is a research method used in comparative politics to analyze and evaluate political systems, institutions, and behaviors across different countries. This approach helps identify patterns, similarities, and differences that provide insights into how various political entities function, their governance structures, and the cultural contexts that shape them. By looking at multiple nations, researchers can better understand the complexities of political phenomena and the factors influencing outcomes in each setting.
Cultural diffusion: Cultural diffusion refers to the process by which cultural beliefs, practices, and items are spread from one society or social group to another. This can occur through various means such as trade, migration, or the influence of technology and media. Understanding cultural diffusion is crucial for analyzing how political cultures evolve and interact over time.
Culturalism: Culturalism is a theoretical approach that emphasizes the importance of culture in shaping political behavior and attitudes. It suggests that political outcomes are influenced significantly by the values, beliefs, and norms prevalent within a society. This perspective helps explain how different societies can exhibit unique political cultures based on their historical experiences and social contexts.
Gabriel Almond: Gabriel Almond was a prominent political scientist known for his significant contributions to the study of political culture, particularly in defining how cultural values and beliefs influence political systems. His work has been foundational in understanding how political culture shapes governance, affects citizen engagement, and contributes to the stability or change of regimes across different societies.
National identity: National identity refers to a person's sense of belonging to a particular nation, characterized by shared culture, language, history, and values. It plays a crucial role in shaping political culture as it influences individuals' perspectives on governance, citizenship, and national interests. Understanding national identity is essential for analyzing how it affects collective behavior and political participation within different societies.
Parochial Political Culture: Parochial political culture refers to a political system where individuals have limited awareness and participation in political processes, often focused on local or community issues rather than national or global ones. This type of culture is characterized by a lack of engagement with broader political structures, resulting in citizens who are more concerned with their immediate surroundings and local governance rather than the overarching political system.
Participant political culture: Participant political culture refers to a political environment in which citizens actively engage in the political process, exhibiting a strong sense of political efficacy and responsibility. This culture is characterized by widespread participation in civic activities such as voting, political discussions, and community involvement, reflecting the belief that individual actions can influence political outcomes. In understanding this concept, one can appreciate its role in shaping democratic governance and its implications for political stability and citizen engagement.
Political apathy: Political apathy refers to a lack of interest, enthusiasm, or concern for political processes, events, and issues. This phenomenon can significantly influence the behavior of citizens in a political system, often leading to lower voter turnout, decreased civic engagement, and a general detachment from governance. Understanding the factors that contribute to political apathy is essential, as it intersects with various forms of governance, socialization processes, and cultural contexts within societies.
Political efficacy: Political efficacy refers to the belief that individuals can influence political processes and that their participation in politics matters. This concept connects deeply with how political culture shapes citizens' views on their role in governance and the effectiveness of their actions, impacting everything from engagement levels to trust in institutions.
Political Evolution: Political evolution refers to the gradual development and transformation of political systems, institutions, and behaviors over time, influenced by social, economic, and cultural changes. This concept helps in understanding how political cultures adapt and shift in response to new challenges and contexts, reflecting the dynamic nature of governance and citizen engagement.
Political Participation: Political participation refers to the ways in which individuals engage in political processes and influence decision-making within their communities or countries. This engagement can manifest through various activities such as voting, campaigning, advocacy, and community organizing. Understanding the factors that affect political participation helps to analyze trends in voter turnout, the impact of political culture, and the role of socialization agents in shaping individuals' political behavior.
Political socialization: Political socialization is the process through which individuals acquire their political beliefs, values, and behaviors, shaping their understanding of political life. This process is influenced by various factors such as family, education, media, and social environment, which help form one's political identity. The way individuals are socialized politically has significant implications for their voting behavior, the overall political culture of a society, and the stability or change of political regimes.
Political trust: Political trust refers to the confidence that citizens have in their political institutions, leaders, and the overall government system. It plays a crucial role in shaping civic engagement, policy compliance, and the effectiveness of governance. High levels of political trust can lead to increased political participation, while low trust may result in apathy or dissent among the populace.
Sidney Verba: Sidney Verba is a prominent political scientist known for his significant contributions to the study of political culture, participation, and civic engagement. His research has emphasized the importance of political culture in shaping individuals' attitudes towards politics and their participation in democratic processes, linking individual beliefs to broader societal trends.
Subject political culture: Subject political culture refers to a type of political culture where citizens are primarily passive and have limited participation in political processes. In this context, individuals often view themselves as subjects of the state rather than active participants in governance, which influences their attitudes towards authority and civic engagement.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.