scoresvideos
Intro to Comparative Politics
Table of Contents
Unit 1 Overview: Comparative Politics: Scope and Key Concepts
1.1 Defining Comparative Politics and Its Importance
1.2 Research Methods in Comparative Politics
1.3 Key Concepts and Theories in Comparative Analysis
1.4 Historical Development of Comparative Politics as a Field

Comparative politics emerged as a distinct subfield in the late 19th century, focusing on systematic comparisons of political systems. It evolved from case studies to more quantitative approaches, embracing interdisciplinary methods to analyze complex political phenomena.

Key scholars like Tocqueville, Weber, and Moore laid the foundation for modern comparative analysis. Historical events, such as decolonization and the Cold War, shaped the field's development, expanding its scope and influencing research priorities.

Origins of Comparative Politics

Emergence as a Distinct Subfield

  • Comparative politics emerged as a distinct subfield of political science in the late 19th and early 20th centuries
  • Scholars began systematically comparing political systems and institutions across different countries
  • Early comparative studies focused primarily on the political systems of Western Europe and North America, often using a case study approach to analyze specific countries or regions

Methodological Developments

  • The behavioral revolution in political science during the 1950s and 1960s led to a shift towards more quantitative and scientific approaches to comparative analysis
  • Statistical methods and cross-national datasets were increasingly used in comparative research
  • The comparative historical approach, which emphasizes the importance of historical context and path dependence in shaping political outcomes, gained prominence in the 1970s and 1980s
  • In recent decades, comparative politics has become increasingly interdisciplinary, drawing on insights from fields such as economics, sociology, and anthropology to analyze complex political phenomena

Key Scholars in Comparative Politics

Foundational Works

  • Alexis de Tocqueville's "Democracy in America" (1835) provided an in-depth analysis of the American political system and its implications for democratic governance, considered a seminal work in comparative politics
  • Max Weber's comparative studies of bureaucracy and political leadership, including his concept of the "ideal type," laid the foundation for much of modern comparative political analysis
  • Barrington Moore's "Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy" (1966) used a comparative historical approach to examine the social and economic factors that led to the emergence of different political regimes in Europe and Asia (e.g., the role of the bourgeoisie in the development of democracy)

Influential Contributions

  • Seymour Martin Lipset's "Political Man" (1960) examined the social and economic conditions necessary for the emergence and stability of democratic regimes, influencing subsequent research on democratization and political development
  • Samuel P. Huntington's "Political Order in Changing Societies" (1968) analyzed the challenges of political modernization and the role of institutions in maintaining political stability, shaping debates on political development and regime change
  • Robert Putnam's "Making Democracy Work" (1993) analyzed the role of social capital and civic engagement in promoting effective governance and economic development, influencing research on civil society and democratic performance (e.g., the importance of trust and cooperation in fostering responsive government)

Impact of Historical Events on Comparative Politics

Decolonization and the Expansion of the Field

  • The process of decolonization in the mid-20th century led to the emergence of newly independent states in Africa, Asia, and the Caribbean (e.g., India, Nigeria, and Jamaica)
  • This provided new opportunities for comparative political analysis and expanded the scope of the field beyond its earlier focus on Western Europe and North America
  • Scholars began to study the political development and challenges faced by these newly independent countries, such as nation-building, economic development, and the establishment of democratic institutions

The Cold War and Ideological Conflict

  • The Cold War rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union shaped much of comparative political research in the post-World War II era
  • Scholars sought to understand the dynamics of ideological conflict and the factors that contributed to the stability or instability of different political regimes
  • Modernization theory, which posited that economic development would lead to the emergence of democratic political systems, was in part a response to the perceived threat of communist expansion in the developing world
  • The study of totalitarianism and authoritarianism became a major focus of comparative politics during the Cold War, as scholars sought to understand the nature and dynamics of non-democratic regimes (e.g., the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, and Maoist China)

Post-Cold War Developments

  • The end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s led to a renewed interest in the study of democratization and political transitions
  • Many former communist states in Eastern Europe and Central Asia began to embrace democratic reforms (e.g., Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic)
  • The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the subsequent "War on Terror" have led to a growing interest in the comparative study of political violence, terrorism, and counterinsurgency, as well as the relationship between religion and politics in different societies (e.g., the rise of Islamic fundamentalism and its impact on political stability in the Middle East and North Africa)

Methodological Advancements

  • The growing availability of cross-national data and the development of new statistical techniques have enabled comparative political researchers to conduct more sophisticated quantitative analyses of political phenomena across a wide range of countries and time periods
  • Comparative political researchers are increasingly using experimental methods, such as field experiments and survey experiments, to test theories and hypotheses about political behavior and attitudes in real-world settings (e.g., using randomized controlled trials to study the impact of electoral campaigns on voter turnout)

Globalization and Political Economy

  • The study of globalization and its impact on national politics has become an increasingly important area of comparative research
  • Scholars seek to understand how global economic, social, and cultural forces are reshaping political systems and institutions around the world (e.g., the impact of international trade agreements on domestic politics)
  • The comparative study of political economy, which examines the relationship between politics and markets, has become increasingly important in an era of global economic integration and rising inequality
  • This includes research on the varieties of capitalism, the politics of economic reform, and the distributional consequences of different economic policies (e.g., the impact of austerity measures on social welfare programs)

Identity Politics and Social Movements

  • The rise of populist and nationalist movements in many countries has led to a renewed focus on the study of political parties, electoral systems, and public opinion, as well as the factors that contribute to the success or failure of these movements (e.g., the rise of right-wing populist parties in Europe and the United States)
  • The study of identity politics, including issues of race, ethnicity, gender, and sexuality, has become a growing area of comparative research
  • Scholars seek to understand how these factors shape political attitudes, behavior, and outcomes in different societies (e.g., the impact of gender quotas on women's political representation)

Digital Communication and Political Participation

  • The growth of social media and other forms of digital communication has created new opportunities and challenges for comparative political research
  • Scholars seek to understand how these technologies are reshaping political participation, mobilization, and public opinion formation in different countries (e.g., the role of social media in the Arab Spring uprisings)
  • The use of big data and computational methods in comparative political research has expanded, allowing for the analysis of large-scale datasets on political behavior and communication (e.g., using text analysis to study political discourse on Twitter)

Key Terms to Review (26)

Rational Choice Theory: Rational Choice Theory is a framework for understanding social and economic behavior by assuming that individuals make decisions based on a systematic process of weighing costs and benefits to maximize their utility. This theory has played a crucial role in the development of various fields, providing insights into political behavior, legislative processes, and voter decision-making.
Post-cold war period: The post-cold war period refers to the time following the end of the Cold War, which is commonly marked by the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. This era is characterized by significant shifts in international relations, a rise in globalization, and a reevaluation of political ideologies, leading to new patterns of cooperation and conflict among states.
Institutionalism: Institutionalism is a theoretical approach in comparative politics that emphasizes the role of institutions—formal and informal rules, norms, and organizations—in shaping political behavior and outcomes. This perspective highlights how institutions can influence everything from policy-making to economic development, providing a framework to analyze the stability and change within political systems.
Cold War Era: The Cold War Era was a period of geopolitical tension and rivalry between the Soviet Union and the United States, spanning from the end of World War II in 1945 until the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. This era was characterized by ideological conflict, military competition, and a series of proxy wars, which significantly shaped global politics and influenced the development of comparative politics as a field of study.
Making Democracy Work: Making democracy work refers to the processes and practices that ensure democratic systems function effectively, providing representation, accountability, and participation for citizens. This concept emphasizes the importance of institutional design, political culture, and citizen engagement in fostering stable and responsive democratic governance. It also highlights the necessity for both political elites and the general populace to contribute actively to the health and sustainability of democracy.
Political Order in Changing Societies: Political order in changing societies refers to the structures, systems, and norms that maintain stability and governance during periods of social, economic, and political transformation. This concept highlights how established political systems adapt or respond to shifts in societal values, demographics, and power dynamics, which can lead to both conflict and cooperation among various actors.
Democracy in America: Democracy in America is a foundational text written by Alexis de Tocqueville in the early 19th century, analyzing the American political system, society, and culture. Tocqueville's work highlights the unique characteristics of American democracy, including its emphasis on equality, individualism, and civic participation, while also addressing potential challenges and consequences of such a system. This text has played a crucial role in shaping the understanding of democracy and comparative politics.
Political Man: Political man refers to the concept of individuals as inherently political beings, driven by their social interactions, affiliations, and interests in governance and power. This idea emphasizes the role of human behavior, identity, and social structures in shaping political actions and institutions, recognizing that people are not just passive subjects but active participants in the political arena.
Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: The social origins of dictatorship and democracy refers to the various societal factors, including economic, social, and cultural elements, that contribute to the establishment and development of political regimes, particularly authoritarian and democratic systems. Understanding these social foundations helps clarify how different societies transition into or out of these political forms and highlights the complexities involved in governance.
Case Study: A case study is an in-depth examination of a specific instance, situation, or example within the broader context of social or political phenomena. It often focuses on a single country, event, or policy to provide detailed insights and draw comparisons that enhance understanding of larger patterns and theories in comparative politics. This method is crucial for illustrating key concepts and allowing for nuanced analysis across different political systems and historical contexts.
Cross-national analysis: Cross-national analysis is a research method in comparative politics that involves examining and comparing political systems, institutions, and behaviors across different countries. This approach helps to identify patterns, similarities, and differences in political phenomena and can provide insights into how various factors influence governance and policy outcomes in diverse contexts.
Seymour Martin Lipset: Seymour Martin Lipset was an influential American sociologist and political scientist, best known for his work on the relationship between social structure and political behavior. His theories have played a pivotal role in shaping the field of comparative politics, particularly through his exploration of the conditions that foster democracy and political stability.
Robert Putnam: Robert Putnam is a prominent American political scientist known for his influential work on social capital and civic engagement, particularly his study of the decline of community involvement in the United States. His research highlights the critical role that social networks and civic associations play in fostering democratic governance and public life, making him a key figure in understanding how societies function and evolve over time.
The republic: A republic is a form of government in which the country is considered a 'public matter' and is not the private concern of the rulers. It often involves elected representatives and an elected leader, such as a president, rather than a monarch. The idea of a republic has been central to discussions about governance and civic engagement throughout history, influencing various political systems and ideologies across the globe.
Post-behavioralism: Post-behavioralism is an approach in political science that emerged in the 1960s as a response to the limitations of behavioralism, emphasizing the importance of human values, social contexts, and historical events in political analysis. This perspective argues that political science should not only focus on empirical data and quantitative methods but also consider normative aspects and the real-world implications of political phenomena.
Behavioral Revolution: The behavioral revolution refers to a major shift in the field of political science during the mid-20th century, emphasizing the importance of empirical research and the systematic study of individual and group behavior in politics. This movement sought to replace traditional qualitative approaches with quantitative methods, focusing on observable actions and patterns to better understand political phenomena and decision-making processes.
Barrington Moore: Barrington Moore was a prominent political sociologist known for his influential work on the relationship between social structures and political outcomes, particularly in his book 'Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy.' His analysis emphasizes how different paths of economic development shape political regimes, connecting historical patterns of class formation to modern state-building. Moore’s comparative approach has helped establish foundational ideas within the study of comparative politics.
Decolonization: Decolonization is the process through which colonies gain independence from colonial powers, leading to the establishment of sovereign states. This movement has been shaped by a variety of factors, including nationalistic aspirations, anti-colonial struggles, and the broader geopolitical shifts following World War II. As nations transitioned from colonial rule to self-governance, decolonization fundamentally influenced state formation and development, as well as the evolution of comparative politics as a field that analyzes power dynamics in these newly formed states.
Democracy: Democracy is a system of government in which power is vested in the people, who exercise that power directly or through elected representatives. It is characterized by principles such as political equality, participation, and protection of individual rights. This form of governance plays a crucial role in shaping the functions and structures of modern states, historical political developments, and various political-economic systems.
State-Building: State-building refers to the processes through which a state constructs or reconstructs its institutions, governance, and authority to establish legitimacy and sovereignty. This involves creating a framework that supports political stability, effective administration, and social order, which can be challenged by various factors such as conflicts, weak institutions, and external pressures.
Globalization: Globalization refers to the process of increasing interconnectedness and interdependence among countries, economies, cultures, and populations through trade, communication, and technological advances. This phenomenon shapes how states interact, influences their sovereignty, and transforms economic systems, impacting both development and legitimacy in political contexts.
Max Weber: Max Weber was a German sociologist and political economist known for his influential theories on the nature of authority, bureaucracy, and the role of the state in society. His ideas have profoundly shaped our understanding of how states function, the legitimacy of political authority, and the social dynamics that challenge state sovereignty and development.
Nation-building: Nation-building refers to the process of constructing or structuring a national identity and promoting a sense of unity among a group of people within a defined territory. It often involves establishing political institutions, fostering national culture, and ensuring social cohesion to create a stable and effective state. This concept is crucial in understanding how societies can emerge from conflict or instability, making it relevant to discussions on state structures, historical developments, and responses to failed states.
Authoritarianism: Authoritarianism is a political system characterized by the concentration of power in a single authority or a small group, where individual freedoms are often restricted, and political pluralism is limited. This system stands in contrast to democratic governance, impacting how states operate and interact with their citizens and the international community.
Samuel P. Huntington: Samuel P. Huntington was a prominent American political scientist known for his influential theories on political order, democracy, and cultural conflict. His work has significantly shaped the understanding of democratization processes, historical development of political analysis, key concepts in comparative politics, and the relationship between political and economic systems.
Alexis de Tocqueville: Alexis de Tocqueville was a French political thinker and historian best known for his work 'Democracy in America,' where he analyzed the effects of democracy on American society and its political institutions. His insights into social and political behavior have significantly influenced the field of comparative politics, particularly in understanding the relationship between constitutional design and democratic governance.