Case study research is a powerful tool in policy analysis, offering deep insights into complex issues. It allows researchers to examine real-world situations, uncovering nuances that broader studies might miss. From single to multiple case designs, this approach adapts to various research needs.

Exploratory, descriptive, and explanatory case studies serve different purposes in policy research. By carefully selecting units of analysis, using , and applying techniques like and , analysts can draw robust conclusions to inform policy decisions.

Types of Case Studies

Single and Multiple Case Studies

Top images from around the web for Single and Multiple Case Studies
Top images from around the web for Single and Multiple Case Studies
  • Single case study focuses on one specific case or instance to gain in-depth understanding of a phenomenon (Walmart's supply chain management)
  • Multiple case study involves analyzing several cases to compare and contrast findings across different contexts or situations (leadership styles in various tech startups)
  • Single case studies allow for more detailed examination but may have limited generalizability
  • Multiple case studies provide broader insights and can help identify patterns or differences across cases

Exploratory, Descriptive, and Explanatory Case Studies

  • aims to generate hypotheses or theories about a poorly understood phenomenon (the impact of a new policy on a specific community)
  • provides a detailed account of a particular case, event, or situation without attempting to draw causal inferences (the implementation process of a new healthcare program)
  • seeks to explain the causes or reasons behind a phenomenon by analyzing a specific case in-depth (factors contributing to the success of a particular educational intervention)
  • The choice of case study type depends on the research question, available data, and the stage of knowledge development in the field

Case Study Design and Analysis

Unit of Analysis and Triangulation

  • refers to the main entity or level being studied in a case study (individual, group, organization, event, or process)
  • Choosing the appropriate unit of analysis is crucial for defining the scope and boundaries of the case study
  • Triangulation involves using multiple data sources, methods, or investigators to enhance the credibility and validity of case study findings
  • : gathering data from different sources (interviews, documents, observations)
  • : using various methods to collect and analyze data (qualitative and quantitative approaches)
  • : involving multiple researchers in the case study to reduce bias and improve reliability

Theoretical Propositions and Pattern Matching

  • are initial hypotheses or explanations that guide the case study analysis and help focus attention on relevant data
  • Developing propositions based on existing theories or literature can provide direction and structure to the case study
  • Pattern matching involves comparing empirically observed patterns in the case study data with predicted or theoretical patterns
  • If the observed patterns align with the predicted patterns, it strengthens the internal validity of the case study findings
  • Rival explanations should also be considered and ruled out to enhance the robustness of the conclusions

Cross-Case Synthesis

  • Cross-case synthesis is an analytical technique used in multiple case studies to identify common themes, patterns, or differences across cases
  • It involves systematically comparing and contrasting the findings from each case to generate higher-level insights or theories
  • Cross-case synthesis can be performed using various strategies:
    • Creating word tables or matrices to display data from individual cases and identify cross-cutting themes
    • Developing case descriptions or narratives to capture the key features and findings of each case
    • Using visual displays (charts, networks, or diagrams) to illustrate relationships or patterns across cases
  • The goal of cross-case synthesis is to move beyond individual case findings and develop more generalizable conclusions or theories

Key Terms to Review (13)

Cross-case synthesis: Cross-case synthesis is a research method that involves comparing and integrating findings from multiple case studies to derive broader insights and generalizations. This approach helps researchers identify patterns, similarities, and differences across different cases, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon being studied.
Data triangulation: Data triangulation is a method used in research that involves using multiple data sources or methods to validate findings and enhance the credibility of results. This approach helps to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the research problem by cross-verifying information and identifying patterns across different perspectives. By integrating various data sources, researchers can mitigate bias and improve the reliability of their conclusions.
Descriptive case study: A descriptive case study is a research method that provides a detailed account of a specific instance or phenomenon in its real-life context. It focuses on providing comprehensive descriptions and insights about the subject being studied, often using various data collection methods such as interviews, observations, and document analysis to gather rich qualitative data.
Explanatory case study: An explanatory case study is a type of research method that aims to provide an in-depth understanding of complex phenomena by examining the cause-and-effect relationships within a specific context. This approach often involves a detailed analysis of a single case or a small number of cases to explain how and why certain outcomes occur, making it particularly useful in public policy analysis for understanding real-world implications and decision-making processes.
Exploratory case study: An exploratory case study is a research approach used to investigate a phenomenon when there are few or no existing theories or prior research available. This type of study is particularly useful for gaining insights into complex issues, guiding future research directions, and identifying variables and relationships that may be important for further examination.
Investigator triangulation: Investigator triangulation is a qualitative research technique that involves using multiple researchers to collect and analyze data, enhancing the credibility and validity of the study findings. This approach helps to minimize bias by integrating different perspectives, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of the research problem. It is particularly valuable in case study research where complex phenomena require diverse viewpoints for thorough exploration.
Method triangulation: Method triangulation is a research strategy that involves using multiple methods or approaches to gather data on a single topic or phenomenon, aiming to enhance the validity and reliability of the findings. By integrating different perspectives and methodologies, researchers can cross-verify results, uncover deeper insights, and mitigate biases associated with any single method.
Multiple-case study: A multiple-case study is a research approach that involves the systematic investigation of several cases within a single study to understand complex phenomena through comparative analysis. This method allows researchers to draw broader conclusions by examining differences and similarities across multiple instances, enhancing the richness of the findings. It is particularly useful in public policy analysis, where diverse contexts and outcomes can reveal deeper insights into effective strategies and interventions.
Pattern matching: Pattern matching is a method used in research to identify and analyze recurring themes, behaviors, or trends within a set of data. This technique allows researchers to draw connections between different cases or instances, enabling a deeper understanding of the underlying principles or outcomes that are common across various contexts.
Single-case study: A single-case study is a research design that focuses on an in-depth examination of a specific instance, event, or phenomenon within its real-life context. This approach allows researchers to explore complex issues and gain insights that might not be captured through larger-scale studies, making it particularly valuable for understanding unique situations or the intricacies of individual cases.
Theoretical propositions: Theoretical propositions are statements that put forward a hypothesis or assertion about the relationship between two or more variables. They are fundamental to building and testing theories in research, particularly in case study research, as they guide the investigation and help interpret findings within a structured framework.
Triangulation: Triangulation refers to the use of multiple methods or data sources to study a phenomenon, enhancing the credibility and validity of research findings. By integrating different approaches, researchers can cross-verify results, which helps in capturing the complexity of social phenomena and reducing biases associated with any single method.
Unit of Analysis: The unit of analysis refers to the major entity that is being studied in a research project, such as individuals, groups, organizations, or social phenomena. It determines what is being analyzed and helps shape the research questions, data collection methods, and interpretation of results. Choosing the correct unit of analysis is critical because it influences how findings are generalized and what conclusions can be drawn from the study.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.