Rational Choice Theory and Bounded Rationality are key models in decision-making. They offer contrasting views on how people make choices, with Rational Choice assuming perfect information and utility maximization, while Bounded Rationality acknowledges cognitive limits.
These models shape our understanding of decision-making in various fields. They highlight the tension between ideal rationality and real-world constraints, influencing how we analyze and predict human behavior in complex situations.
Rational Choice Theory
Assumptions and Principles
Top images from around the web for Assumptions and Principles
Using a Decision Tree | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
Using a Decision Tree | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Assumptions and Principles
Using a Decision Tree | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original
Is this image relevant?
Using a Decision Tree | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Rational Choice Theory assumes individuals make decisions based on a rational assessment of costs and benefits
Individuals are assumed to have well-defined preferences and the ability to rank alternatives based on those preferences
Decisions are made with the goal of maximizing utility, which is a measure of satisfaction or benefit derived from a choice
Perfect information is assumed, meaning individuals have complete knowledge about the alternatives, their outcomes, and the associated probabilities
Utility Maximization
Utility maximization is the central principle of Rational Choice Theory
Individuals are assumed to choose the alternative that provides the highest level of utility or satisfaction
Utility can be measured in various ways, such as monetary value, happiness, or other forms of benefit
The concept of marginal utility is important, which refers to the additional utility gained from consuming one more unit of a good or service
Individuals are expected to make decisions that maximize their total utility, considering the costs and benefits of each alternative
Limitations and Criticisms
The assumption of perfect information is often unrealistic, as individuals rarely have complete knowledge about all alternatives and their outcomes
Rational Choice Theory does not account for the influence of emotions, social norms, or other non-rational factors on decision-making
The theory assumes individuals have stable and well-defined preferences, which may not always be the case in reality
Critics argue that the theory oversimplifies human behavior and fails to capture the complexity of real-world decision-making processes
Bounded Rationality
Concept and Definition
Bounded Rationality is an alternative to Rational Choice Theory, proposed by Herbert A. Simon
It recognizes the limitations of human cognitive abilities and the presence of incomplete information in decision-making
Individuals are assumed to have limited computational capacity and face constraints in processing information
Bounded Rationality suggests that individuals make decisions based on simplified models of reality, rather than perfect optimization
Satisficing
Satisficing is a key concept in Bounded Rationality, introduced by Herbert A. Simon
It refers to the process of making decisions that are "good enough" rather than optimal
Individuals set an aspiration level, which is a minimum acceptable outcome, and choose the first alternative that meets or exceeds that level
Satisficing is a more realistic approach to decision-making, as it acknowledges the limitations of human cognitive abilities and the costs of searching for optimal solutions
Cognitive Limitations and Heuristics
Bounded Rationality emphasizes the cognitive limitations that individuals face when making decisions
These limitations include limited attention, memory, and computational capacity
To cope with these limitations, individuals often rely on heuristics, which are simple rules of thumb or mental shortcuts
Heuristics allow individuals to make decisions quickly and efficiently, but they can also lead to biases and errors in judgment
Examples of heuristics include the availability heuristic (judging the likelihood of an event based on how easily examples come to mind) and the representativeness heuristic (judging the probability of an event based on how similar it is to a typical case)
Decision-Making Under Uncertainty
Concept and Definition
Decision-Making Under Uncertainty refers to situations where individuals must make choices without complete information about the outcomes or probabilities
In these situations, individuals face risk (known probabilities) or ambiguity (unknown probabilities)
Decision-Making Under Uncertainty is a common challenge in real-world settings, such as business, finance, and public policy
Prospect Theory
Prospect Theory is a behavioral model of decision-making under uncertainty, developed by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky
It challenges the assumptions of Rational Choice Theory and incorporates psychological insights into decision-making
Prospect Theory suggests that individuals evaluate outcomes relative to a reference point, typically the status quo
The theory proposes that individuals are loss-averse, meaning they are more sensitive to losses than to equivalent gains
Probability weighting is another key concept in Prospect Theory, which suggests that individuals overweight small probabilities and underweight large probabilities
Prospect Theory helps explain various observed phenomena, such as the endowment effect (the tendency to value items more when they are owned) and the framing effect (the influence of how a decision problem is presented on the choices made)