Fiveable

🧤Physical Chemistry I Unit 7 Review

QR code for Physical Chemistry I practice questions

7.3 Chemical potential and equilibrium constants

7.3 Chemical potential and equilibrium constants

Written by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated August 2025
Written by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated August 2025
🧤Physical Chemistry I
Unit & Topic Study Guides

Chemical potential connects Gibbs free energy to the composition of a system, telling you how the energy changes when you add or remove a small amount of a particular species. This is the central concept for understanding why reactions proceed in a given direction and where equilibrium lies. It bridges the gap between bulk thermodynamic quantities and the molecular-level changes that drive reactions.

Chemical Potential and Gibbs Free Energy

Definition and Relationship

Chemical potential (μi\mu_i) is defined as the partial molar Gibbs free energy of component ii:

μi=(Gni)T,P,nji\mu_i = \left(\frac{\partial G}{\partial n_i}\right)_{T, P, n_{j \neq i}}

In plain terms, it answers the question: "If you add an infinitesimal amount of species ii to the mixture, holding temperature, pressure, and all other amounts fixed, how much does the total Gibbs energy change?"

A few important consequences follow from this definition:

  • In a system at equilibrium, the chemical potential of each component is the same in every phase it occupies. If it weren't, material would spontaneously transfer from the high-μ\mu phase to the low-μ\mu phase until the potentials equalize.
  • The total Gibbs energy of a mixture can be written as G=iniμiG = \sum_i n_i \mu_i.
  • The Gibbs-Duhem equation constrains how chemical potentials in a mixture can change simultaneously: inidμi=0\sum_i n_i \, d\mu_i = 0 at constant TT and PP. This means the chemical potentials of different components in a mixture are not independent of one another.

Expressions for Chemical Potential

The general form relates chemical potential to activity (aia_i):

μi=μi+RTlnai\mu_i = \mu_i^\circ + RT \ln a_i

where μi\mu_i^\circ is the standard chemical potential (the value at a defined reference state). The activity takes different forms depending on the system:

  • Ideal gas: ai=pi/pa_i = p_i / p^\circ, so μi=μi+RTln(pi/p)\mu_i = \mu_i^\circ + RT \ln(p_i / p^\circ), where pip_i is the partial pressure and p=1p^\circ = 1 bar.
  • Ideal solution: ai=xia_i = x_i, so μi=μi+RTlnxi\mu_i = \mu_i^\circ + RT \ln x_i, where xix_i is the mole fraction.
  • Non-ideal systems use fugacity (for gases) or activity coefficients (for solutions) to correct for deviations from ideal behavior. That's beyond the scope here, but the general μ=μ+RTlna\mu = \mu^\circ + RT \ln a framework still holds.

Notice that because lnxi\ln x_i and ln(pi/p)\ln(p_i/p^\circ) are negative when xi<1x_i < 1 or pi<pp_i < p^\circ, the chemical potential of a species in a mixture is always lower than its pure-component standard value. This is why mixing is thermodynamically favorable for ideal systems.

Equilibrium Constants and Chemical Potentials

Deriving the Equilibrium Constant

For a general reaction iνiAi=0\sum_i \nu_i A_i = 0 (using the convention that stoichiometric coefficients νi\nu_i are positive for products and negative for reactants), the Gibbs energy change is:

ΔG=iνiμi\Delta G = \sum_i \nu_i \mu_i

Substituting μi=μi+RTlnai\mu_i = \mu_i^\circ + RT \ln a_i:

ΔG=iνiμiΔG+RTlniaiνiQ\Delta G = \underbrace{\sum_i \nu_i \mu_i^\circ}_{\Delta G^\circ} + RT \ln \underbrace{\prod_i a_i^{\nu_i}}_{Q}

This gives the fundamental equation:

ΔG=ΔG+RTlnQ\Delta G = \Delta G^\circ + RT \ln Q

where QQ is the reaction quotient. At equilibrium, ΔG=0\Delta G = 0 and Q=KQ = K, so:

0=ΔG+RTlnK0 = \Delta G^\circ + RT \ln K

Rearranging:

ΔG=RTlnKor equivalentlyK=exp ⁣(ΔGRT)\Delta G^\circ = -RT \ln K \qquad \text{or equivalently} \qquad K = \exp\!\left(-\frac{\Delta G^\circ}{RT}\right)

This is the central result connecting chemical potentials (through ΔG\Delta G^\circ) to the equilibrium constant.

The van 't Hoff Equation

Since ΔG=ΔHTΔS\Delta G^\circ = \Delta H^\circ - T\Delta S^\circ, you can write:

lnK=ΔHRT+ΔSR\ln K = -\frac{\Delta H^\circ}{RT} + \frac{\Delta S^\circ}{R}

This is the van 't Hoff equation in its integrated form (assuming ΔH\Delta H^\circ and ΔS\Delta S^\circ are approximately temperature-independent). It shows that a plot of lnK\ln K vs. 1/T1/T gives a straight line with slope ΔH/R-\Delta H^\circ / R and intercept ΔS/R\Delta S^\circ / R. The differential form is:

dlnKd(1/T)=ΔHR\frac{d \ln K}{d(1/T)} = -\frac{\Delta H^\circ}{R}

Definition and Relationship, Potential, Free Energy, and Equilibrium | Chemistry for Majors

Calculating Equilibrium Constants

From Standard Chemical Potentials

  1. Look up (or calculate) the standard chemical potential μi\mu_i^\circ for each reactant and product. For pure substances, μ\mu^\circ equals the standard molar Gibbs energy, which in turn equals ΔGf\Delta G_f^\circ (the standard Gibbs energy of formation).

  2. Compute the standard Gibbs energy change: ΔG=νproductsμproductsνreactantsμreactants\Delta G^\circ = \sum \nu_{\text{products}} \mu_{\text{products}}^\circ - \sum \nu_{\text{reactants}} \mu_{\text{reactants}}^\circ

  3. Calculate KK: K=exp ⁣(ΔGRT)K = \exp\!\left(-\frac{\Delta G^\circ}{RT}\right)

Worked example: For \ceA+B<=>C\ce{A + B <=> C} with μA=20\mu_A^\circ = -20 kJ/mol, μB=30\mu_B^\circ = -30 kJ/mol, μC=60\mu_C^\circ = -60 kJ/mol at T=298T = 298 K:

ΔG=(60)(20+(30))=10 kJ/mol\Delta G^\circ = (-60) - (-20 + (-30)) = -10 \text{ kJ/mol}

Convert to J: ΔG=10,000\Delta G^\circ = -10{,}000 J/mol.

K=exp ⁣(10,0008.314×298)=exp(4.04)57K = \exp\!\left(\frac{10{,}000}{8.314 \times 298}\right) = \exp(4.04) \approx 57

Watch the sign and units. A very common error is forgetting to convert kJ to J before dividing by RTRT. Also note the sign: ΔG/RT-\Delta G^\circ / RT, so a negative ΔG\Delta G^\circ gives a positive exponent and K>1K > 1.

From Standard Formation Gibbs Energies

The procedure is identical, since μi\mu_i^\circ for a pure substance equals ΔGf,i\Delta G_{f,i}^\circ:

ΔG=νproductsΔGf,productsνreactantsΔGf,reactants\Delta G^\circ = \sum \nu_{\text{products}} \Delta G_{f,\text{products}}^\circ - \sum \nu_{\text{reactants}} \Delta G_{f,\text{reactants}}^\circ

Worked example: For \ce2A+B<=>C\ce{2A + B <=> C} with ΔGf(A)=20\Delta G_f^\circ(A) = -20 kJ/mol, ΔGf(B)=30\Delta G_f^\circ(B) = -30 kJ/mol, ΔGf(C)=100\Delta G_f^\circ(C) = -100 kJ/mol at 298 K:

ΔG=(100)[2(20)+(30)]=100(70)=30 kJ/mol\Delta G^\circ = (-100) - [2(-20) + (-30)] = -100 - (-70) = -30 \text{ kJ/mol}

K=exp ⁣(30,0008.314×298)=exp(12.11)1.8×105K = \exp\!\left(\frac{30{,}000}{8.314 \times 298}\right) = \exp(12.11) \approx 1.8 \times 10^5

Predicting Reaction Direction

Using Chemical Potentials

The system always evolves to lower its total Gibbs energy. Compare the sum of chemical potentials on each side of the reaction:

  • If νproductsμproducts<νreactantsμreactants\sum \nu_{\text{products}} \mu_{\text{products}} < \sum \nu_{\text{reactants}} \mu_{\text{reactants}}, the forward reaction lowers GG, so the reaction proceeds toward products.
  • If the inequality is reversed, the reverse reaction is spontaneous.
  • When the two sums are equal, the system is at equilibrium.
Definition and Relationship, Free Energy | Chemistry: Atoms First

Using the Reaction Quotient

Equivalently, compare QQ to KK:

  • Q<KQ < K: The system has too little product relative to equilibrium. The reaction proceeds forward (ΔG<0\Delta G < 0).
  • Q>KQ > K: The system has too much product. The reaction proceeds in reverse.
  • Q=KQ = K: Equilibrium. No net change.

The value of KK itself tells you about the equilibrium position:

  • K1K \gg 1: Products strongly favored at equilibrium.
  • K1K \ll 1: Reactants strongly favored.
  • K1K \approx 1: Comparable amounts of reactants and products.

Effects on Chemical Potentials and Equilibrium Constants

Temperature Effects

Temperature influences chemical potentials through the Gibbs-Helmholtz relation:

((μi/T)(1/T))P=Hi\left(\frac{\partial(\mu_i / T)}{\partial(1/T)}\right)_P = H_i

where HiH_i is the partial molar enthalpy of component ii. The practical consequence for equilibrium constants comes from the van 't Hoff equation:

dlnKd(1/T)=ΔHR\frac{d \ln K}{d(1/T)} = -\frac{\Delta H^\circ}{R}

  • Exothermic reactions (ΔH<0\Delta H^\circ < 0): Increasing TT decreases KK. The equilibrium shifts toward reactants.
  • Endothermic reactions (ΔH>0\Delta H^\circ > 0): Increasing TT increases KK. The equilibrium shifts toward products.

This is the quantitative basis for Le Chatelier's principle with respect to temperature.

Pressure Effects

Pressure affects chemical potentials through:

(μiP)T=Vi\left(\frac{\partial \mu_i}{\partial P}\right)_T = V_i

where ViV_i is the partial molar volume. For reactions involving gases, the key factor is the change in the total number of moles of gas, Δngas\Delta n_{\text{gas}}:

  • If Δngas<0\Delta n_{\text{gas}} < 0 (fewer moles of gas in products), increasing pressure shifts equilibrium toward products.
  • If Δngas>0\Delta n_{\text{gas}} > 0 (more moles of gas in products), increasing pressure shifts equilibrium toward reactants.

An important subtlety: the thermodynamic equilibrium constant KK (defined in terms of activities) does not change with pressure at constant temperature. What changes is the composition at equilibrium. For ideal gases, KpK_p is pressure-independent, but KxK_x (expressed in mole fractions) depends on total pressure when Δngas0\Delta n_{\text{gas}} \neq 0.

Composition Effects

Changing the amounts of reactants or products alters their activities and therefore their chemical potentials via μi=μi+RTlnai\mu_i = \mu_i^\circ + RT \ln a_i.

  • Adding more reactant increases QQ relative to its current value... actually, adding reactant decreases QQ (since reactant activities appear in the denominator of QQ). This makes Q<KQ < K, so the reaction shifts forward to re-establish equilibrium.
  • Removing product has the same effect: QQ decreases, driving the forward reaction.

The equilibrium constant KK itself does not change with composition at fixed TT. Only QQ changes, and the system adjusts until Q=KQ = K again.

2,589 studying →