Know-Nothings

The Know-Nothings were a nativist political movement of the 1850s, organized as the American Party, that pushed anti-immigrant and anti-Catholic policies in response to Irish and German immigration. In APUSH, they show how nativism reshaped party politics in the run-up to the Civil War (Topic 5.5).

Verified for the 2027 AP US History examLast updated June 2026

What are the Know-Nothings?

The Know-Nothings were the political face of 1850s nativism. Massive immigration from Ireland and Germany in the 1840s and 1850s brought millions of newcomers, many of them Catholic, who settled in ethnic neighborhoods in Northern cities where they kept their languages, customs, and religion. To many native-born Protestants, that looked like a threat to American jobs, culture, and politics. The CED captures this directly in KC-5.1.II.B, which says a strongly anti-Catholic nativist movement arose aimed at limiting new immigrants' political power and cultural influence. The Know-Nothings were that movement turned into a party.

They got their odd name from their roots as a secret society. When members were asked about the organization, they were supposed to say "I know nothing." By the mid-1850s they went public as the American Party, winning state offices and pushing for things like longer naturalization periods and keeping immigrants and Catholics out of office. Their rise also tells you something bigger about the decade. The old Whig Party was falling apart over slavery, and voters scattered toward new parties built around single issues. The Know-Nothings organized around immigration; the Republicans organized around stopping slavery's expansion. Slavery proved to be the issue that mattered more, and the Know-Nothings split along sectional lines and faded fast, with many Northern members drifting into the new Republican Party.

Why the Know-Nothings matter in APUSH

The Know-Nothings live in Unit 5 (Civil War and Reconstruction, 1848-1877), specifically Topic 5.5, Sectional Conflict. They directly support learning objective APUSH 5.5.A, explaining the effects of immigration on American culture from 1844 to 1877, and they're the textbook example of KC-5.1.II.B's anti-Catholic nativist movement. They also connect to APUSH 5.5.B because their brief rise and quick collapse shows how slavery overwhelmed every other political issue in the 1850s. For themes, they're a go-to example for Migration and Settlement (MIG) and Politics and Power (PCE), and they're perfect evidence for a continuity argument about nativism, since the same anxieties resurface against Chinese immigrants in the Gilded Age and "new immigrants" in the early 1900s.

How the Know-Nothings connect across the course

Nativism (Units 5-6)

Nativism is the ideology; the Know-Nothings are the party built on it. If an exam question asks for a specific example of antebellum nativism in action, the Know-Nothings are your answer. The ideology outlives the party and shows up again with the Chinese Exclusion Act in Unit 6.

American Party (Know-Nothing Party) (Unit 5)

These are the same organization, not two different groups. "Know-Nothings" was the nickname from their secret-society days, and "American Party" was the official name once they ran candidates openly in the mid-1850s.

Free-soil movement (Unit 5)

Both were political responses to 1850s upheaval, but they worried about different things. Free-soilers feared slavery's expansion would crowd out free labor; Know-Nothings feared immigrants would crowd out native-born Americans. When the Whigs collapsed, both groups fed members into the new Republican Party, and slavery won out as the defining issue.

Bleeding Kansas (Unit 5)

Bleeding Kansas helps explain why the Know-Nothings died so quickly. Once violence over slavery erupted in 1856, voters cared far more about the slavery crisis than about immigration, and the American Party split along sectional lines just like the Whigs before it.

Are the Know-Nothings on the APUSH exam?

Multiple-choice questions usually hand you context about Irish and German immigration in the 1840s-1850s and ask what it most directly caused. The answer is the rise of nativist movements like the Know-Nothings. Stems also test the reverse direction, asking what historical context best explains the Know-Nothing Party's rise (answer: the surge of Catholic immigration and fear of immigrants' political power). One common angle asks about the persistent concern behind anti-Catholic nativism, which was the worry that Catholic immigrants would gain political and cultural influence. No released FRQ has used the term verbatim, but the Know-Nothings are strong evidence in two essay situations. First, any prompt on the political realignment of the 1850s, where you can show the Whig collapse splintering voters before the Republicans consolidated them. Second, continuity-and-change arguments about nativism across periods, linking 1850s anti-Catholicism to Gilded Age anti-Chinese sentiment and 1920s immigration quotas.

The Know-Nothings vs Free-Soil Party

Both were 1850s third parties that rose as the Whigs collapsed and eventually fed into the Republican Party, so they blur together. But their core issues were totally different. The Free-Soil Party opposed the expansion of slavery into western territories because it threatened free labor. The Know-Nothings opposed immigration and Catholicism. A quick test for MCQs: if the question mentions slavery in the territories, think free-soil; if it mentions Irish or German Catholic immigrants, think Know-Nothings.

Key things to remember about the Know-Nothings

  • The Know-Nothings were a nativist, anti-Catholic political movement of the 1850s that formally organized as the American Party.

  • They arose in direct response to the wave of Irish and German immigration, much of it Catholic, that began in the 1840s (KC-5.1.II.B).

  • Their goal was to limit immigrants' political power and cultural influence, for example by lengthening the naturalization period and keeping Catholics out of office.

  • Their rise reflects the collapse of the Whig Party and the political chaos of the 1850s, but slavery quickly overwhelmed nativism as the dominant issue and the party split along sectional lines.

  • Many Northern Know-Nothings ended up in the new Republican Party, helping explain the realignment that produced Lincoln's 1860 victory.

  • The Know-Nothings are top-tier evidence for continuity arguments about American nativism, which resurfaces with Chinese exclusion in the Gilded Age and quota laws in the 1920s.

Frequently asked questions about the Know-Nothings

What were the Know-Nothings in APUSH?

The Know-Nothings were a nativist political movement of the 1850s, formally called the American Party, that pushed anti-immigrant and anti-Catholic policies in response to Irish and German immigration. They appear in Unit 5, Topic 5.5, as the key example of antebellum nativism.

Why were they called the Know-Nothings?

The movement started as a secret society, and when members were asked about it they were instructed to reply "I know nothing." The nickname stuck even after they went public as the American Party in the mid-1850s.

Were the Know-Nothings against slavery?

No, opposing slavery was not their purpose. Their issue was immigration and anti-Catholicism, and the party actually split along sectional lines when slavery became unavoidable after events like Bleeding Kansas. Many Northern members later joined the antislavery Republican Party, but as Republicans, not as Know-Nothings.

What is the difference between the Know-Nothings and the American Party?

Nothing, they're the same group. "Know-Nothings" was the popular nickname from their secret-society origins, and "American Party" was the official party name they used when running candidates in the 1850s. The exam may use either label.

Why did the Know-Nothing Party fail?

Slavery swallowed it. By 1856, conflict over slavery's expansion (Bleeding Kansas, then the Dred Scott decision in 1857) dominated politics, and the party fractured into Northern and Southern wings. The Republican Party absorbed most of its Northern voters by 1860.