The DBQ rubric has five categories: thesis/claim (1 point), contextualization (1 point), evidence (up to 3 points), analysis and reasoning (1 point), and complexity (1 point). The evidence category is where most points are won or lost. Using a document means more than quoting it; you need to explain how it supports your argument. Sourcing a document means connecting its historical situation, audience, purpose, or point of view to your argument. Contextualization requires a full paragraph of historical background before 1754 or outside the prompt's direct scope, not just a sentence.
- Thesis/claim: A historically defensible claim that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning. It must go beyond restating the prompt.
- Contextualization: A developed explanation of a broader historical context that is relevant to the prompt. Must be more than a phrase; needs to be a full explanation of how context connects to the argument.
- Document evidence: Using at least 3 documents to address the topic earns 1 point; using at least 6 documents to support your argument earns a second point.
- Sourcing (HAPP): For at least 3 documents, explain how the historical situation, audience, purpose, or point of view affects the document's meaning or limitations.
- Outside evidence: Using at least one piece of specific evidence not found in the documents earns 1 point under the evidence category.
- Complexity: Demonstrating a complex understanding of the topic, such as explaining both similarity and difference, both continuity and change, or multiple causes. Must be sustained throughout the essay, not just mentioned once.
After a practice DBQ, count how many documents you sourced with HAPP and whether your contextualization paragraph is at least 4-5 sentences of developed explanation.
| Rubric category | Points available | Most common mistake |
|---|
| Thesis/claim | 1 | Restating the prompt instead of making a claim |
| Contextualization | 1 | Writing one sentence instead of a developed paragraph |
| Document evidence | 2 | Summarizing documents instead of using them as evidence |
| Sourcing (HAPP) | 1 | Identifying HAPP without explaining its significance |
| Outside evidence | 1 | Forgetting to include any evidence beyond the documents |