Skip to main content

Byzantine Empire in AP World History: Modern

The Byzantine Empire was the eastern half of the Roman Empire that kept going after the western half collapsed, ruled from its capital at Constantinople. It held onto Roman law and imperial government while running on Greek language and Orthodox Christianity. By 1200 it was an old, shrinking state, and it ended when the Ottoman Turks captured Constantinople in 1453.

This definition is part of Fiveable's AP World History: Modern review, which also has guided practice questions.

Verified for the 2027 AP World History: Modern exam•Last updated November 2026•Fiveable Content Team

Emperor, Orthodox Church, and Roman law: Byzantium's sources of legitimacy

Byzantine emperors claimed to be the rightful heirs of Rome, and they ruled with the close backing of the Orthodox Church. The emperor was treated as God's chosen ruler and had real influence over church affairs, so religion and government reinforced each other. Roman legal tradition, organized under Emperor Justinian in the 500s, gave the state a long-standing legal framework.

The Orthodox Church had formally split from the Roman Catholic Church in the Great Schism of 1054. That matters for keeping the two straight. Byzantium was Orthodox and Greek-speaking, and Western Europe was Catholic and looked to the pope in Rome.

In the course, Byzantium fits Unit 1 under Topic 1.7, Comparisons from 1200-1450, which asks how state building across regions showed both continuity and innovation. Byzantium is a clean example of continuity. It kept legitimizing power the old way (Roman imperial ideas plus Christianity), which parallels how the Song Dynasty relied on Confucianism and a trained bureaucracy.

From the 1204 sack to the 1453 conquest

During 1200-1450 the empire was losing ground. Turkic groups had been taking its Anatolian territory since the late 1000s, and the Fourth Crusade sacked Constantinople in 1204. That was Western Christian crusaders attacking a Christian city. The Byzantines retook their capital in 1261, but the empire never regained its earlier size or wealth.

The Ottomans, a Turkic state that rose in Anatolia, kept expanding. By 1453, Byzantine territory had dwindled to Constantinople and a few other holdings, notably the Morea in southern Greece. That year Sultan Mehmed II captured Constantinople, with cannons helping break its massive walls. The city became the Ottoman capital, and the Hagia Sophia, the empire's great cathedral, was turned into a mosque.

This is where Byzantium reaches into Unit 3. The fall of Constantinople is a turning point for the Ottomans as a gunpowder-using land-based empire, and Orthodox Christian communities now lived under Muslim rule. Topic 3.3 centers on the Reformations and the Sunni-Shi'a split, so treat Byzantium there as background for the Ottoman state rather than a main 3.3 example.

Constantinople as a western anchor of the Silk Roads

Constantinople sits on the strait between Europe and Asia and controlled passage between the Black Sea and the Mediterranean. That made it a natural meeting point for goods coming west along Silk Road and Black Sea routes. Silk, spices, and other luxury goods passed through its markets on their way to European buyers.

For Topic 2.1, The Silk Roads, Constantinople works as an example of a powerful city shaped by commerce, alongside the course's examples of Kashgar and Samarkand farther east. By the later centuries, Italian merchants from Venice and Genoa controlled much of the trade moving through the region, which hints at how weak the Byzantine state had become even while its capital stayed commercially important.

Writing Byzantium into a 1200-1450 comparison

Think of Byzantium as evidence you bring in yourself. It fits best in a Long essay or a short-answer response asking how states kept or gained power between 1200 and 1450, or in a multiple-choice question with a map or text stimulus about the eastern Mediterranean. A strong comparison pairs it with a state that relied on tradition in a similar way (the Song) or with a newer state that broke from the old order, like the Turkic sultanates that rose as the Abbasid Caliphate fragmented.

A top answer names a specific method of legitimacy (the emperor's tie to the Orthodox Church, Roman law) and explains why it counts as continuity. If the prompt asks about change, it names a specific change inside the prompt's dates, such as the 1204 crusader sack or the 1261 recovery of Constantinople. Bring in the 1453 Ottoman conquest only if the prompt's dates reach that far or it asks about what came after.

Watch for these mix-ups:

  • Dating the fall to 476. That's the traditional end of the Western Roman Empire. Byzantium lasted until 1453.
  • Blending the 1204 crusader sack with the 1453 Ottoman conquest. The Byzantines survived the first and recovered their capital.
  • Calling the Byzantines Catholic. After 1054 their church was Orthodox, separate from the pope.
  • Treating Byzantium as a brand-new state in this period. In Topic 1.7 terms it's the opposite, an old empire relying on old sources of legitimacy.

Where this sits in AP® World

Keep studying AP® World Unit 1