The Southeast Asian city model (McGee model) explains the internal structure of cities like Jakarta and Bangkok, where growth radiates from a colonial-era port rather than a traditional CBD, and residential, commercial, and industrial land uses mix together instead of sorting into distinct zones.
The Southeast Asian city model, developed by geographer T.G. McGee, describes how cities in countries like Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, and Vietnam are organized internally. The biggest difference from North American models is the focal point. Instead of a central business district, these cities grew around a port zone, because colonial trade is what built them in the first place. Around that port you find a western commercial zone, an "alien" commercial zone historically dominated by Chinese merchants, a government zone, and then a jumble of middle-class housing, squatter settlements, and industrial estates spreading outward, with market gardening (intensive farming) at the edge.
The defining trait is mixed land use. Homes, markets, small factories, and temples sit side by side rather than separating into neat rings or sectors. On the AP exam, this model is one of several you need under EK PSO-6.D.1, alongside the Burgess concentric-zone model, Hoyt sector model, multiple-nuclei model, galactic city model, bid-rent theory, and the Latin American and African city models. Think of it as the answer to the question "what does a city look like when a port, not a downtown, is the anchor?"
This term lives in Topic 6.5 (The Internal Structure of Cities) in Unit 6: Cities and Urban Land-Use Patterns and Processes, and it directly supports learning objective 6.5.A: explain the internal structure of cities using various models and theories. The CED explicitly lists urban models drawn from Southeast Asia as required knowledge (EK PSO-6.D.1), so this isn't optional enrichment. The bigger payoff is conceptual. The Southeast Asian model shows you that the classic American models (Burgess, Hoyt, multiple-nuclei) don't transfer everywhere. Colonialism, trade geography, and culture produce different urban structures, which is exactly the kind of spatial reasoning AP Human Geography rewards.
Keep studying AP® Human Geography Unit 6
Burgess Concentric Zone Model (Unit 6)
Burgess assumes a strong CBD with land uses sorting into rings around it. The Southeast Asian model is almost the opposite, with no dominant CBD and land uses blended together. Comparing the two is the fastest way to show you understand why models built on Chicago don't explain Jakarta.
African City Model (Unit 6)
Both models describe cities shaped by colonialism, but they shape up differently. The African model features multiple CBDs (colonial, traditional, and market zones) ringed by informal settlements, while the Southeast Asian model centers everything on a port. If an exam question mentions a port focus, think Southeast Asia; multiple distinct CBDs points to Africa.
Central Business District (CBD) (Unit 6)
The CBD is the anchor of most urban models, which makes the Southeast Asian model the great exception. Its port zone does the job a CBD does elsewhere. Knowing one model deliberately lacks a CBD sharpens your understanding of what a CBD actually is.
Developing Countries (Units 6-7)
Features like squatter settlements and informal markets in the Southeast Asian model connect to broader patterns of rapid urbanization in the periphery and semi-periphery. The same colonial trade history that built these port cities also shaped their economic development paths.
This model shows up most often in multiple-choice questions that describe or show a city's spatial pattern and ask which model best explains it. The giveaways are a Southeast Asian location (Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia), a port or river-based commercial core, and land uses that are interspersed rather than zoned. For example, a stem might describe aerial photography of an Indonesian city where housing, markets, small factories, and temples mix throughout the urban area with no clear separation, or a map of Bangkok where a riverside core is surrounded by traditional markets and workshops, then housing and informal settlements farther out. Your job is to match the pattern to the right model and rule out lookalikes, like a São Paulo description with an elite sector and peripheral favelas (Latin American model) or a Nairobi description with a colonial core and scattered modern nodes (African model). On FRQs, this model supports compare-and-contrast tasks under 6.5.A, where you might explain how colonial history produces different internal structures than the ones North American models predict.
Both describe cities in developing regions shaped by colonialism, but their geometry is different. The Latin American (Griffin-Ford) model has a strong CBD with an elite spine extending outward and squatter settlements pushed to the outer ring, so wealth is organized by sector and distance. The Southeast Asian model has no real CBD at all. A port zone anchors the city, and rich and poor land uses mix throughout instead of sorting cleanly. If the question describes a wealthy sector stretching from downtown, that's Latin America. If it describes a port focus with everything jumbled together, that's Southeast Asia.
The Southeast Asian city model, created by T.G. McGee, explains cities like Jakarta and Bangkok that grew around a colonial-era port instead of a central business district.
Its signature feature is mixed land use, meaning homes, markets, factories, and religious sites are interspersed throughout the city rather than separated into distinct zones.
Key zones include the port, a western commercial zone, an alien (often Chinese) commercial zone, a government zone, squatter settlements, and market gardening on the edge.
It is one of the required urban models under EK PSO-6.D.1 in Topic 6.5, alongside Burgess, Hoyt, multiple-nuclei, galactic, bid-rent, and the Latin American and African models.
On the exam, a port-centered city with no clear zonation points to the Southeast Asian model, while an elite spine points to Latin America and multiple CBDs point to Africa.
It's T.G. McGee's model of urban structure in cities like Jakarta and Bangkok, where the city is centered on a colonial-era port rather than a CBD and land uses (residential, commercial, industrial) mix together instead of forming distinct zones. It's required content under EK PSO-6.D.1 in Topic 6.5.
No, and that's its defining feature. The port zone serves as the city's focal point because these cities developed around colonial trade, while commercial activity is scattered through western and alien (Chinese merchant) commercial zones rather than concentrated in one downtown.
The Latin American model keeps a strong CBD with an elite residential spine extending from it and squatter settlements on the periphery. The Southeast Asian model has no CBD, centers on a port instead, and mixes rich and poor land uses throughout the city rather than sorting them by sector.
Geographer T.G. McGee developed it based on his study of Southeast Asian port cities, which is why you'll sometimes see it called the McGee model. Both names refer to the same model on the AP exam.
Jakarta (Indonesia), Bangkok (Thailand), Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia), and Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam) are the classic examples. Exam questions usually signal the model by describing an Indonesian or Thai city with a port or riverside core and interspersed land uses.
Connect this key term to the AP exam workflow: review the course, practice questions, and check related study tools.
Review units, study guides, and course resources.
Check this vocabulary in multiple-choice context.
Apply key concepts in written AP responses.
Estimate the exam score you are working toward.
Review the highest-yield facts before practice.
Put the full course together before test day.