AP Drawing Sustained Investigation

Overview

• Weight: 60% of your total portfolio score
• Requirements: 15 digital images demonstrating inquiry-based investigation through drawing
• Written components:
  • Inquiry statement (600 chars)
  • Process description (600 chars)
  • For each image: materials, processes, size (100 chars each)
• Scoring: Four criteria - Inquiry (20%), Practice/Experimentation/Revision (30%), Materials/Processes/Ideas (30%), Drawing Skills (20%)
• Key focus: Showing how mark-making and drawing evolve through sustained investigation

The Intimate Act of Drawing: Where Thinking Becomes Visible

Drawing is the most honest art form - every hesitation, every confident stroke, every nervous tremor gets recorded. Your Sustained Investigation should honor this raw honesty. Ask questions that only drawing's directness can answer: "How do marks accumulate trauma?" "Can the speed of a line hold memory?" "What happens in the space between the first mark and the last?"

Here's drawing's superpower: immediacy. While painters mix and sculptors construct, you can make fifty discoveries with a pencil in an hour. Leverage this advantage. Fill sketchbooks with rapid investigations where each page pushes an idea further. Document drawing sessions where one discovery cascades into the next. Include both drawings that emerged in five minutes and changed everything, alongside those that required days of sustained effort.

Process becomes content in drawing. A photo of eraser shavings piled like snow documents destruction as creation. An image showing graphite dust on a palm provides physical evidence of time spent. Worn-down drawing tools arranged like surgical instruments make commitment visible. These aren't supporting images - they're chapters in your story.

Materials expand drawing vocabulary when explored fully. Beginning with pencil provides foundation, but consider what happens when drawing with steel wool, coffee, or the non-dominant hand. What if the paper draws back - working on sandpaper, or newspaper, or surfaces that resist? Document these conversations between tool and surface. Show the breakthrough that happened when you finally found the right paper for your touch.

Watch how your marks evolve from technique to language. Early on, you might think "I'll use cross-hatching for shadows." By the end, you'll think "These obsessive marks are anxiety made visible." That transformation - when HOW you draw becomes inseparable from WHAT you're expressing - that's the sweet spot. That's when drawing stops being about depicting and starts being about knowing.

Rubric Breakdown

Row A - Inquiry (20% of SI score):

Score Point 3 requires your inquiry to guide the sustained investigation. In drawing, this means your question should evolve as you discover what marks can do. Your inquiry might begin with "investigating how..." but through making, you discover complexities you couldn't have anticipated. The visual evidence should show this deepening understanding.

For drawing portfolios, strong inquiries often investigate drawing's essential qualities: the relationship between gesture and mark, time and accumulation, surface and touch, presence and absence. Avoid inquiries that use drawing merely as rendering tool. Instead, focus on questions only drawing can answer through its unique properties of directness, accumulation, and trace.

Row B - Practice, Experimentation, and Revision (30% of SI score):

Practice in drawing might mean creating multiple rapid studies exploring mark vocabularies, or spending weeks on single large drawings that accumulate meaning through time. Show both approaches if relevant. Document series where you work through similar problems with different solutions - five ways to create atmospheric space through mark density, various approaches to suggesting movement through line quality.

Experimentation should push drawing's boundaries while maintaining its essential character. This might mean drawing with unconventional tools (sticks, wire, body parts), on unusual surfaces (found papers, walls, fabric), or through innovative processes (blind contour, drawing with both hands, responsive mark-making to sound). Document failed experiments that led to breakthroughs - they reveal artistic thinking.

Revision in drawing has unique possibilities. Unlike painting where you cover previous work, drawing can show its history. Erasure leaves ghosts. Corrections create palimpsests. Working into drawings over time creates archaeological layers. Make revision conceptually relevant - if exploring memory, perhaps erasure and redrawing embodies forgetting and remembering.

Row C - Materials, Processes, and Ideas (30% of SI score):

Synthesis in drawing happens when mark-making becomes meaning-making. If investigating anxiety, perhaps your marks literally record physiological responses - trembling lines, pressure variations, compulsive repetition. If exploring growth patterns, maybe you develop drawing processes that mirror organic development - branching, accumulating, spreading. Every material choice and process should feel conceptually necessary.

Document how your understanding of drawing materials deepens. Early works might use charcoal for its darkness. Middle works discover charcoal's ability to be moved, lifted, ghosted. Later works show charcoal's specific properties (dustiness, impermanence, ability to fill space atmospherically) as conceptually essential. This journey from using materials to thinking through materials should be visible.

Row D - Drawing Skills (20% of SI score):

Advanced drawing skills encompass far more than representational accuracy:

• Sophisticated mark vocabulary (varied line weights, textures, rhythms)
• Complex spatial construction through drawing means
• Nuanced value orchestration
• Intentional use of drawing's time-based qualities
• Surface sensitivity and activation
• Compositional sophistication specific to drawing

Remember that "skill" is contextual. Trembling, uncertain marks might show advanced skill if they serve an inquiry about vulnerability. Dense, obsessive cross-hatching shows skill if investigating psychological states. The key is intentionality and consistency across works.

Pattern Recognition

Successful Drawing Sustained Investigations often reveal recognizable trajectories. The "mark vocabulary expansion" pattern shows increasing sophistication in mark-making variety and intentionality. The "scale journey" explores how drawing changes when moving from intimate to architectural scale. The "time-based evolution" uses drawing's ability to record duration as investigative tool.

Conceptual deepening through material understanding is another pattern. Students might begin using line to describe forms, discover line's emotional qualities, explore line as energy or movement, and culminate in works where line becomes space, time, or psychological state. This evolution from descriptive to evocative mark-making demonstrates sustained investigation.

Surface activation evolution appears in strong portfolios. Early drawings might sit on the surface. Middle works begin considering the paper/support as active participant. Later works show sophisticated understanding of how marks and surface collaborate to create meaning - choosing colored papers, working on found documents, or preparing surfaces that interact with marks conceptually.

The Daily Practice (Or: How to Actually Make This Happen)

Drawing's immediacy is both gift and curse. Yes, you can make work anywhere, anytime. But that means you MUST make work everywhere, constantly. This isn't a twice-a-week studio practice - it's a daily conversation with mark-making.

A proven timeline for sustained investigation:

• September: Draw badly. Draw constantly. 20-30 sketches minimum. Find one mark that surprises you.
• October: Chase that surprise. 40-50 drawings. Let materials lead - if charcoal starts doing something weird, follow it.
• November-December: Explosion phase. 100+ drawings. Work fast, think later. Document everything.
• January-February: Recognition phase. Patterns emerge. Start understanding your own obsessions. More focused work.
• March: Synthesis. Make the drawings that know everything the previous ones taught you.
• April: Edit ruthlessly. From 200+ drawings, find the 15 that chart your journey.

Documentation strategy: Photograph immediately - drawings change. Charcoal smudges, paper yellows, erasure ghosts fade. But also capture the making: your blackened fingers, the accumulated paper scraps, the wall where drawings live while you decide their fate. Set up consistent lighting and shoot everything - you won't know which process shot is gold until later.

The 600-character statements require clear, evocative language. For example: "Started scratching paper with sandpaper - the surface fought back, created these raw wounds that felt more honest than any line could achieve. Began working on medical forms from family files - the bureaucracy of illness becoming ground for mark-making about loss."

Carry drawing materials like survival gear. The best discoveries happen on receipt backs during conversations, on newspapers while waiting, in margins while thinking about something else. Your investigation lives in these accumulated moments as much as in planned studio time.

The Drawing Life: What This Really Means

By the end of this investigation, you'll understand something fundamental: drawing is a way of thinking that happens through your hand. Not thinking THEN drawing - thinking THROUGH drawing. The readers can tell the difference between someone who uses drawing to illustrate ideas and someone who discovers ideas through the act of making marks.

Drawing's accessibility is its power. No expensive equipment or special studio required - just a surface, mark-making tools, and commitment to begin. This accessibility enables daily practice. Draw on everything. Draw with everything. Investigations have been transformed by drawings made with mascara on receipts, sticks in dirt, or breath on windows.

Contemporary drawing has exploded past "accurate representation" - thank goodness. Your investigation might include blind drawings, durational drawings, drawings that erase themselves, drawings made by walking, drawings that only exist in shadows. But maintain drawing's essential DNA: the direct trace of human gesture making meaning visible.

The strongest investigations reveal drawing as a form of research. Each mark is a question, each drawing an experiment. Your 15 images should show how drawing helped you know something unknowable any other way. Maybe you discovered that grief has a specific line quality. Maybe you found that repetitive marks can hold time. Maybe you learned that erasure speaks louder than addition.

Here's the truth: this investigation changes how you see. You'll start noticing the quality of shadows on walls, the rhythm of cracks in pavement, the way your hand moves when you're anxious. Drawing becomes a lens for experiencing the world more intensely. That transformation - from someone who draws to someone who sees through drawing - that's the real work.

Trust the marks. Trust the process. Trust that simple tools in honest hands can reveal profound truths. Make marks like your understanding depends on it. Because it does.