Overview
- Weight: 60% of your total portfolio score
- Requirements: 15 digital images demonstrating inquiry-based investigation in 3-D
- Written components:
- Inquiry statement (600 chars)
- Process description (600 chars)
- For each image: materials, processes, size (100 chars each)
- Scoring: Four criteria - Inquiry (20%), Practice/Experimentation/Revision (30%), Materials/Processes/Ideas (30%), 3-D Skills (20%)
- Key focus: Documenting 3-D thinking development through investigation
Strategy Deep Dive
Working in three dimensions involves physical engagement with materials and space. The 15 images must translate the dimensional experience of creating sculpture into compelling documentation. This challenge requires strategic photography that captures the essence of physical work.
Your inquiry should specifically require three-dimensional exploration. Strong questions address spatial relationships, physical forces, or material properties that only sculpture can investigate. Examples include: "How does gravity become a collaborator rather than an obstacle?" "What happens when interior space becomes more important than the containing form?" "Can fragility support weight?" These questions engage with physical reality in ways unique to 3-D work.
Documentation should capture process discoveries. Photograph moments of understanding - when building an armature reveals how tension creates form, when failed joining methods lead to breakthroughs, when material behaviors teach new approaches. Include multiple angles of significant pieces showing different aspects: the initial view, problematic areas, and successful resolutions.
Materials have inherent properties that influence investigation. Clay retains memory of touch, wood has directional grain, metal has structural tendencies. Your investigation becomes dialogue with materials - proposing ideas, responding to material feedback, adapting approaches. Document both unsuccessful and successful material experiments to show learning.
Physical making generates knowledge through hands-on experience. A collapsed piece might reveal structural principles. Material limitations might force innovative solutions. These embodied discoveries form the core of dimensional investigation. Capture evidence of physical problem-solving and material understanding as it develops.
Rubric Breakdown
Row A - Inquiry (20% of SI score):
Score Point 3 requires your inquiry to guide the investigation. In 3-D, this means your question should evolve as you physically engage with materials and space. Your written inquiry might start with "investigating how..." but by image 15, your work should show deeper understanding than your initial question imagined.
Visual evidence of inquiry in 3-D means showing how your question manifests in form, not just concept. If investigating balance and instability, we need to see various approaches to precarious construction. If exploring interior/exterior relationships, show different ways you've opened, revealed, or inverted forms.
Row B - Practice, Experimentation, and Revision (30% of SI score):
Practice in 3-D involves both conceptual and technical repetition. Show multiple approaches to similar problems - five different ways to create texture, various methods of joining materials, different scales of the same form. This repetition builds both skill and understanding.
Experimentation means genuine material and spatial risk-taking. Include "failed" pieces that led somewhere important. Maybe you tried casting concrete but the forms broke, leading you to explore fragmentation as concept. Document experiments even if the final result wasn't portfolio-worthy - the thinking matters more than the product.
Revision in 3-D might mean literally rebuilding earlier pieces with new understanding, or returning to initial concepts with evolved techniques. Show how technical discoveries led to conceptual shifts. Perhaps mastering a joining technique allowed you to build more complex forms that better served your inquiry.
Row C - Materials, Processes, and Ideas (30% of SI score):
Synthesis in 3-D happens when material properties become meaning. If exploring themes of pressure and release, perhaps you're literally compressing materials and documenting their spring-back. If investigating growth, maybe you're using expandable materials or time-based processes. The readers should understand why these specific materials and processes serve your ideas.
Document material thinking evolution. Early works might use materials literally. Middle works show symbolic use. Later works show synthesis where material, process, and idea become inseparable. This journey should be visible through your image selection and written descriptions.
Row D - 3-D Skills (20% of SI score):
Advanced 3-D skills encompass:
- Deep understanding of form and space relationships
- Complex construction techniques done with skill
- Surface treatments that enhance rather than mask form
- Scale decisions that create impact
- Material handling that shows deep understanding
Skills should serve inquiry. If exploring fragility, delicate construction isn't just showing off - it's necessary for the concept. Document skills through both overall views and detail shots that reveal technical skill.
Pattern Recognition
Successful 3-D Sustained Investigations often follow recognizable arcs. The "material mastery" pattern shows increasing sophistication with a primary medium while integrating others. The "scale journey" pattern explores similar forms at radically different scales, each revealing new insights. The "process evolution" pattern shows technique development driving conceptual growth.
Spatial thinking evolution appears in strong portfolios. Early works might treat sculpture as 3-D drawing - forms that exist in space but don't activate it. Middle works begin engaging with negative space. Later works show deep understanding of how forms create spatial relationships and viewer experiences.
Construction method development often drives investigation. Students might begin with additive methods (building up), discover subtractive possibilities (carving away), and culminate in transformative processes (casting, slumping). This technical journey parallels conceptual development.
Time Management Reality
Three-dimensional work requires accounting for material constraints. Drying times, kiln schedules, curing processes, and structural requirements all affect production timelines. Planning must accommodate these physical realities while maintaining creative momentum.
Recommended timeline for 3-D investigation:
- September: Explore various materials through quick studies. Test different approaches affordably.
- October: Focus on primary materials. Create 3-4 pieces establishing investigation direction.
- November-December: Intensive production period. Create 8-10 pieces with thorough documentation. Reserve kiln time and drying space early.
- January-February: Breakthrough period when material understanding deepens. Push technical and conceptual boundaries.
- March: Create culminating works demonstrating mastery and synthesis.
- April: Final documentation and thoughtful curation.
Documentation requires dedicated setup with consistent lighting - ideally three-point lighting for dimensional work. Photograph all stages: pre-assembly, construction process, completion, and significant details. Include process evidence like material tests, work surfaces, and even shadows that reveal form. These images provide crucial context for understanding development.
Written statements should use precise sculptural language. Use active verbs: "carved, cast, constructed, assembled, balanced, suspended, compressed." Focus on spatial and material qualities rather than appearance. Example: "Discovered unfired clay retains memory better than fired. Pressed found objects into wet surfaces, removed to leave ghost impressions - absence becoming presence." This specificity helps readers understand your dimensional thinking.
Final Thoughts
The 3-D Sustained Investigation develops both technical skills and dimensional thinking. Through sustained engagement with materials and space, you learn to solve problems where physics becomes a creative partner. The investigation demonstrates not just ability to construct forms, but understanding of why dimensional work creates meaning uniquely.
Your 15 images translate physical experience into visual narrative. Select images that convey weight, balance, and spatial tension. Include views showing learning moments - stress points revealing structural principles, successful engineering solutions, shadows that activate form. These images should help viewers understand dimensional thinking development.
Hands-on knowledge develops through material engagement. Physical making teaches material properties - when wire resists, when clay reaches optimal moisture, when wood grain affects construction. This embodied understanding, built through repeated practice, forms the foundation of advanced 3-D work. The investigation cultivates intuitive material knowledge alongside conceptual development.
Visible failures in 3-D work become learning opportunities. Collapsed structures teach engineering principles. Failed molds reveal precision requirements. Unexpected material behaviors open new possibilities. Document these learning moments - they demonstrate genuine investigation rather than mere production.
By completion, the investigation transforms how you understand dimensional space. You develop awareness of how forms activate space, how light reveals surface, how negative space creates meaning. This shift from making 3-D objects to thinking dimensionally represents the deep learning that sustained investigation enables.
Trust material properties, honor process requirements, and allow physical making to guide discovery. The investigation succeeds when technique and concept unite through sustained dimensional exploration.