The Jacksonian era marked a significant period of debate over the proper role and powers of the federal government. Andrew Jackson's presidency (1829-1837) reshaped American politics and governance, establishing the Democratic Party as a dominant force while generating opposition that would form the Whig Party. These competing visions of federal power would shape American politics for decades to come.
Image Courtesy of Wikipedia
Jackson's Rise to Power
Andrew Jackson emerged as a popular figure before his presidency through his military career:
- Gained fame as a general in the War of 1812
- Led American forces to victory at the Battle of New Orleans (1815)
- Expanded American territory through military campaigns against Native Americans
- Invaded Spanish Florida during the First Seminole War (1817-1818)
His military background shaped his forceful approach to presidential power and established his reputation as a champion of frontier interests.
The Election of 1828 and Democratic Vision
Image Courtesy of the National Endowment for the Humanities
After losing the controversial "corrupt bargain" election of 1824, Jackson won a decisive victory in 1828:
- Campaigned as the champion of the "common man" against elite interests
- Benefited from expanded suffrage among white male voters
- Established the Democratic Party as a national political force
- Introduced mass campaign techniques and political organization
Jackson's Democratic vision included:
- Limited federal government in economic affairs
- Opposition to the national bank and federal internal improvements
- Support for states' rights (with important exceptions)
- Expansion of executive power through veto and appointment powers
- Western expansion and removal of Native Americans
- Support for white male equality while maintaining racial hierarchies
Key Conflicts of Jackson's Presidency
The Spoils System
Jackson revolutionized the federal bureaucracy through what critics called the "spoils system":
- Replaced existing federal officeholders with political supporters
- Justified as making government more democratic and responsive to the people
- Critics argued it led to corruption and incompetence
- Dramatically expanded presidential control over the federal bureaucracy
- Established political patronage as a key element of party politics
The Nullification Crisis
The conflict over tariff policy revealed tensions over federal versus state authority:
|
Tariff of 1828 | High protective tariff passed before Jackson took office | Known as "Tariff of Abominations" in the South |
South Carolina Exposition | Anonymous document by John C. Calhoun arguing states could nullify federal laws | Established doctrine of nullification |
Webster-Hayne Debate | Senate debate over nullification and nature of the Union | Articulated competing visions of federal power |
Nullification Ordinance (1832) | South Carolina declared tariffs void within its borders | Direct challenge to federal authority |
Force Bill | Authorized president to use military force to collect tariffs | Demonstrated limits of states' rights |
Compromise Tariff of 1833 | Gradually reduced tariff rates | Resolved immediate crisis but left constitutional questions unresolved |
Jackson's response revealed the limits of his states' rights philosophy - he firmly defended federal supremacy when a state directly challenged federal law.
The Bank War
Jackson's opposition to the Second Bank of the United States represented his most significant economic policy:
- Viewed the Bank as unconstitutional and a threat to democracy
- Vetoed the Bank's recharter in 1832
- Removed federal deposits and placed them in state "pet banks"
- Issued the Specie Circular requiring land purchases with gold or silver
- Contributed to economic instability and the Panic of 1837
- Ended the national banking system until the Civil War
The Bank War reflected Jackson's populist suspicion of concentrated economic power and his willingness to use executive authority aggressively.
Native American Removal
Image Courtesy of People's World
Jackson's policy toward Native Americans represented the most controversial aspect of his legacy:
- Indian Removal Act (1830) authorized relocation of eastern tribes to lands west of Mississippi
- Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) defined tribes as "domestic dependent nations"
- Worcester v. Georgia (1832) recognized tribal sovereignty against state laws
- Jackson ignored Supreme Court rulings protecting Cherokee rights
- Forced removal of southeastern tribes, especially the "Trail of Tears" (1838-1839)
- Approximately 4,000 Cherokee died during the forced march
Jackson's Indian policy reflected the demands of white settlers for land and the era's racial attitudes, while displaying his willingness to challenge judicial authority when it conflicted with his goals.
The Whig Opposition and Second Party System
Jackson's assertive presidency generated organized opposition:
- The Whig Party formed in opposition to what they called "King Andrew"
- Led by Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, and other nationalist politicians
- Supported a stronger federal role in economic development
- Advocated the "American System" of national bank, protective tariffs, and internal improvements
- Criticized Jackson's use of executive power, especially the veto
- Drew support from commercial and manufacturing interests
The competition between Democrats and Whigs created the Second Party System (1828-1854), which featured:
- High voter participation and party loyalty
- Distinct regional and economic constituencies
- Regular alternation of power between parties
- Nationwide party organizations and discipline
- Intense policy debates about the proper role of government
The Legacy of Jacksonian Democracy
Jackson's presidency left a complex legacy for American governance:
- Strengthened the presidency as an institution
- Established political parties as essential to democratic governance
- Expanded political participation for white men
- Advanced territorial expansion and removal of Native Americans
- Dismantled aspects of the early American economic system
- Left unresolved tensions between federal power and states' rights
The debates over federal power during the Jacksonian era established political divisions that would persist and intensify in the decades leading to the Civil War. While Jackson himself maintained the supremacy of the Union, his emphasis on states' rights and limited federal economic intervention would later be invoked by those challenging federal authority over slavery and other sectional issues.