Skip to main content

Andrew Jackson's Spoils System in AP US History

Andrew Jackson's spoils system was his practice, starting after he took office in 1829, of removing federal officeholders and giving their jobs to political supporters. Jackson defended it as "rotation in office," a democratic check on a permanent class of officials. Critics saw it as rewarding party loyalty over qualifications.

This definition is part of Fiveable's AP US History review, which also has guided practice questions.

Verified for the 2027 AP US History exam•Last updated November 2026•Fiveable Content Team

Rotation in office versus "to the victor belong the spoils"

Jackson's own name for the policy was rotation in office. In his first annual message in December 1829, he argued that the duties of government jobs were plain and simple enough for any capable citizen. He added that officials who stayed too long started treating their posts as a kind of property.

The nickname came from one of Jackson's own allies, and his opponents turned it against him. In 1832, New York senator William L. Marcy said "to the victor belong the spoils" while defending the party's appointments. The phrase stuck because it described how the system worked in practice. Winning an election meant winning the jobs.

The term fits Unit 4, Topic 4.8: Jackson and Federal Power, which asks why new parties emerged in the 1820s and 1830s and how they fought over federal power. The spoils system is evidence for how Jackson's Democrats held together as an organization. Campaign workers expected a post office or customs house job if the party won, so they had a reason to turn out voters.

Jackson didn't invent patronage, but he made it a party habit

A wrong answer that looks right says Jackson created the practice of rewarding supporters with jobs. Patronage, meaning the power to hand out government positions, existed before him. Thomas Jefferson replaced Federalist officeholders after 1801.

Jackson's change was openly defending rotation as a principle and tying it to a mass party. The Whigs criticized it, then gave out offices to their own people when they won the presidency in 1840. That shows the practice had become part of how the two-party system ran, whichever side held power.

If an answer choice says the spoils system was unique to Jackson or vanished when he left office, it's probably the distractor.

Spoils system or Corrupt Bargain: 1824 versus 1829

Both terms involve Jackson and accusations of shady politics, so they blur together. The Corrupt Bargain was one event. In the 1824 presidential election no candidate won an electoral majority, the House of Representatives chose John Quincy Adams, and Adams then named Henry Clay secretary of state. Jackson's supporters charged that the two had made a deal.

The spoils system was an ongoing policy Jackson ran as president after winning in 1828. One way to keep them straight is that Jackson was the accuser in the Corrupt Bargain and the accused in the spoils system.

The two connect as cause and effect. Jackson's anger over 1824 fed his claim that an entrenched elite controlled Washington. Rotation in office was his answer to that elite, at least in the way he described it.

Using it as evidence that mass parties had arrived

A source about crowds of office seekers is rarely just about one president's hiring choices. On multiple-choice questions, the stimulus might be a speech excerpt, a critic's complaint, or a political cartoon, and the question asks what larger development it reflects. The usual answer is the rise of organized mass parties and wider political participation for white men, or a later reaction against patronage.

In a Short-answer question built on a secondary source about Jacksonian democracy, the spoils system gives you a specific piece of evidence for either side. It supports a historian who says Jackson brought ordinary men into government. It also supports one who says Jackson concentrated power in his party and the presidency.

On a Long essay about Jacksonian democracy, a strong answer avoids just calling the spoils system corrupt. It connects the practice to the Democrats versus Whigs conflict and weighs Jackson's democratic justification against its costs. It also pairs the spoils system with other uses of federal power from Topic 4.8, like the Bank War or Indian removal.

From Jackson's appointments to Garfield's assassin

The spoils system is also useful for continuity and change over time. By the Gilded Age, patronage fights split the Republican Party. In 1881 Charles Guiteau, a disappointed office seeker, shot President James Garfield.

Congress responded with the Pendleton Act of 1883, which required some federal jobs to be filled through competitive exams instead of party loyalty. That is the start of civil service reform. In a Long essay or Document-based question that spans periods, you can trace a single line from Jackson's rotation in office to the Pendleton Act. That shows how a practice defended as democratic came to be treated as a source of corruption.

Where this sits in APUSH

Keep studying APUSH Unit 4