What is AP World unit 7?
Unit 7 covers the most destructive century in recorded history. The Ottoman, Russian, and Qing empires collapsed under internal and external pressure, opening space for revolutionary governments and new states. Imperialist competition, a tangled alliance system, and intense nationalism ignited World War I. The flawed peace settlement, the Great Depression, and the rise of fascist regimes then produced World War II. Both wars were total wars in which governments mobilized entire societies using propaganda, conscription, and new military technology. The interwar and wartime periods also produced mass atrocities including the Holocaust, the Armenian Genocide, the Holodomor, and later the Cambodian and Rwandan genocides.
Unit 7 is about why and how global conflicts erupted after 1900, how governments fought them, and what patterns of atrocity and instability they left behind. The core skill is causation: explaining which factors mattered most and why.
Collapsing empires and new states
The Ottoman, Russian, and Qing empires all fell by the early twentieth century under combinations of military defeat, internal reform failures, nationalist pressure, and economic strain. Russia's collapse led directly to the Bolshevik Revolution and Soviet state. The Qing fell in the 1911 Revolution, and the Mexican Revolution challenged political order in Latin America at the same time.
Two world wars as total wars
Both WWI and WWII required governments to mobilize entire populations, not just armies. Propaganda, conscription, rationing, and colonial troop recruitment all served the war effort. New technology, from machine guns and poison gas in WWI to blitzkrieg tactics and atomic bombs in WWII, drove casualties to unprecedented levels.
Interwar instability and mass atrocities
The Great Depression forced governments toward intervention: the New Deal in the US, Five Year Plans in the USSR, and fascist corporatist economies in Italy and Germany. Unresolved territorial tensions and the rise of extremist regimes produced mass atrocities including the Holocaust, the Holodomor, and the Armenian Genocide, establishing a grim pattern repeated in Cambodia and Rwanda.
Why global conflict?The AP exam asks you to explain the relative significance of causes of global conflict from 1900 to the present. No single factor explains WWI or WWII. Militarism, alliance systems, imperialism, nationalism, economic crisis, and unresolved territorial grievances all interacted. The skill is building a defensible argument about which causes mattered most and why, using specific evidence from across the unit.
Unit 7 review notes
7.1
Shifting Power After 1900
At the start of the twentieth century, Western powers dominated global politics, but land-based empires were already under severe stress. The Ottoman, Russian, and Qing empires each collapsed under a combination of internal weaknesses and external pressures, producing new states and revolutionary governments by the 1920s.
- Ottoman collapse: Military defeats, nationalist movements among subject peoples, and financial dependence on European creditors eroded Ottoman authority, leading to the empire's dissolution after WWI.
- Russian Revolution: Military failure in WWI, food shortages, and worker unrest toppled the tsar in February 1917; the Bolsheviks under Lenin then seized power in October 1917, establishing a communist state.
- 1911 Revolution (Qing): Internal reform failures, foreign pressure, and Han Chinese nationalism overthrew the Qing dynasty and established the Chinese Republic under Sun Yat-sen and the Guomindang.
- Mexican Revolution: Political crisis under Porfirio Diaz sparked a decade of armed conflict beginning in 1910, producing land reform demands and a new constitutional order.
- Western dominance challenged: While Western maritime empires remained strong in 1900, the collapse of land-based empires and the rise of revolutionary states signaled a shift in the global political order that would accelerate through the century.
Can you explain two internal and two external factors that contributed to the collapse of one land-based empire after 1900?
| Empire | Key internal factor | Key external factor | Outcome |
|---|
| Ottoman | Nationalist separatism among subject peoples | Military defeats in Balkan Wars and WWI | Dissolved; successor states created |
| Russian | Worker and peasant unrest, food shortages | Military collapse in WWI | Bolshevik Revolution; Soviet state |
| Qing | Reform failures, Han nationalism | Foreign imperialism and unequal treaties | 1911 Revolution; Chinese Republic |
7.2
Causes of World War I
WWI broke out in 1914 because multiple long-term pressures converged with a short-term trigger. The MANIA framework captures the main causes: Militarism, Alliance system, Nationalism, Imperialism, and Assassination. No single cause is sufficient; the AP exam expects you to weigh their relative significance.
- Alliance system: The Triple Entente (France, Russia, Britain) and Triple Alliance (Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy) meant a regional dispute could rapidly pull all major powers into war.
- Imperialism and resource competition: European powers competed for colonies and markets, producing crises like the Moroccan Crises that heightened tensions before 1914.
- Nationalism: Pan-Slavism in the Balkans and German nationalism intensified rivalries; the Black Hand's Serbian nationalism directly motivated the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.
- Assassination of Franz Ferdinand: Gavrilo Princip killed the Austro-Hungarian heir in Sarajevo on June 28, 1914, triggering the July Crisis and activating the alliance system.
- Militarism: An arms race, especially the Anglo-German naval rivalry, normalized military buildup and made war seem like a viable policy tool.
Which cause of WWI do you think was most significant, and what evidence supports that argument?
7.3
Conducting World War I
WWI introduced the concept of total war: governments mobilized entire societies, including colonial populations, to sustain the conflict. Propaganda, censorship, conscription, and war bonds kept home fronts committed. New military technology made the war far deadlier than any previous conflict.
- Total war: Governments directed economies, labor, and civilian life toward the war effort, blurring the line between soldiers and civilians.
- Propaganda: Governments used posters, film, and media to build nationalist support, recruit soldiers, and dehumanize enemies in both home countries and colonies.
- Colonial mobilization: Britain, France, and other empires recruited soldiers and laborers from colonies in Africa, South Asia, and Southeast Asia, raising expectations of postwar political recognition.
- New military technology: Machine guns, poison gas, tanks, and aircraft produced trench stalemate on the Western Front and drove casualties at battles like the Somme and Verdun to catastrophic levels.
- Fourteen Points: Woodrow Wilson's 1918 peace framework emphasized self-determination, free trade, and a League of Nations, shaping postwar negotiations and raising hopes that were only partially fulfilled.
How did governments use propaganda and colonial mobilization to sustain WWI, and what were the consequences for colonial peoples?
7.4
Economy in the Interwar Period
The Great Depression beginning in 1929 forced governments worldwide to abandon laissez-faire economics and intervene directly in their economies. Different political systems responded in very different ways, but all expanded state power over economic life.
- Great Depression: The 1929 stock market crash triggered a global economic collapse, causing mass unemployment, deflation, and political instability that weakened democratic governments and strengthened extremist movements.
- New Deal: FDR's US program used government spending, regulation, and social welfare programs to provide relief and recovery, expanding the federal government's economic role.
- Five Year Plans: Stalin's Soviet Union used centralized state planning to rapidly industrialize, collectivizing agriculture and repressing dissent, with severe human costs including famine.
- Fascist corporatist economy: Italy under Mussolini and Germany under Hitler used state-directed corporatism, controlling industry and labor while maintaining nominal private ownership to mobilize economies for nationalist goals.
- Brazil and Mexico: Governments with strong popular support, such as Vargas in Brazil and Cardenas in Mexico, used economic nationalism and state intervention to manage the Depression's impact and build domestic industries.
Compare how two different governments responded to the Great Depression. What does the comparison reveal about the relationship between economic crisis and political ideology?
| Country | Government type | Economic response | Key policy |
|---|
| United States | Liberal democracy | Keynesian spending and regulation | New Deal |
| Soviet Union | Communist state | Total state control and industrialization | Five Year Plans |
| Germany/Italy | Fascist regimes | Corporatist state-directed economy | Fascist corporatism |
| Brazil/Mexico | Nationalist popular governments | Economic nationalism and state investment | Vargas/Cardenas reforms |
7.5
Unresolved Tensions After World War I
The post-WWI settlement did not dismantle Western or Japanese empires. Colonial peoples who had supported the war effort found their demands for self-determination ignored. New territorial arrangements through League of Nations mandates extended imperial control under a different name, while anti-imperial resistance grew.
- League of Nations mandates: Former German colonies were transferred to Britain and France as mandates, maintaining imperial control while framing it as temporary trusteeship toward self-governance.
- Manchukuo: Japan established this puppet state in Manchuria in 1932, part of its Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere strategy to control resources and markets across Asia.
- Indian National Congress: Led by figures including Mohandas Gandhi, the INC organized mass resistance to British rule through nonviolent campaigns, growing in strength during the interwar period.
- West African resistance: Strikes and congresses in French West Africa challenged colonial labor policies and political exclusion, representing organized anti-imperial resistance outside South Asia.
- Continuity and change: The key AP skill for 7.5 is recognizing that imperial control largely continued after WWI (continuity) while anti-imperial resistance intensified (change), setting up decolonization after WWII.
What evidence shows that the post-WWI settlement maintained rather than dismantled imperial control? What evidence shows that resistance was growing?
7.6
Causes and Conduct of World War II
WWII grew directly from WWI's unresolved problems. The unsustainable Versailles settlement, the Great Depression, continued imperial ambitions, and the rise of fascist regimes combined to produce a second global conflict. Like WWI, WWII was a total war, but ideology played a more explicit role in mobilization and repression.
- Causes of WWII: The four main causes were the flawed Versailles peace, the Great Depression, continued imperialism, and the aggressive militarism of fascist regimes, especially Nazi Germany under Hitler.
- Fascism and totalitarianism: Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy used state ideology to mobilize populations, suppress opposition, and justify territorial expansion; the Munich Agreement showed Western powers initially appeasing Hitler.
- Total war in WWII: Governments again mobilized entire economies and populations; democracies like Britain under Churchill and the US under FDR used propaganda and conscription, while totalitarian states also used ideology to repress freedoms.
- New military technology: Blitzkrieg tactics, firebombing of civilian cities, and ultimately the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki pushed WWII casualties far beyond WWI levels.
- Atomic bomb: The US use of atomic weapons against Japan in August 1945 ended the Pacific war and introduced nuclear weapons as a permanent feature of global power politics.
How did the conduct of WWII differ from WWI in terms of technology, ideology, and civilian impact?
| Feature | World War I | World War II |
|---|
| Key new technology | Machine guns, poison gas, tanks | Atomic bomb, firebombing, blitzkrieg |
| Mobilization method | Propaganda, conscription, colonial troops | Propaganda, ideology, total economic control |
| Role of ideology | Nationalism and imperial loyalty | Fascism, communism, and democracy explicitly opposed |
| Civilian casualties | High but mostly indirect | Massive, including deliberate targeting of cities |
7.8
Mass Atrocities After 1900
Extremist regimes and ethnic nationalist movements produced systematic mass killings across the twentieth century. The AP exam expects you to know multiple cases, explain their causes, and understand their consequences for international law and human rights norms.
- Holocaust: The Nazi regime systematically murdered six million Jews and millions of others through concentration camps, mass shootings, and gas chambers; the Nuremberg Trials established individual accountability for crimes against humanity.
- Armenian Genocide: The Ottoman government deported and killed approximately 1.5 million Armenians during and after WWI, making it one of the first modern genocides.
- Holodomor: Stalin's forced collectivization and grain confiscation policies caused a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933, killing millions of Ukrainians.
- Cambodian Genocide: The Khmer Rouge under Pol Pot killed approximately 1.7 million people from 1975 to 1979, targeting intellectuals, ethnic minorities, and perceived class enemies.
- Rwandan Genocide: In 1994, Hutu extremists killed approximately 800,000 Tutsi and moderate Hutu in roughly 100 days, exposing the limits of international intervention and the UN's capacity to prevent genocide.
What common causes appear across multiple twentieth-century genocides? What consequences did these atrocities have for international law?
| Atrocity | Perpetrator | Victims | Approximate period |
|---|
| Armenian Genocide | Ottoman government | Armenians | 1915-1923 |
| Holodomor | Soviet government under Stalin | Ukrainians | 1932-1933 |
| Holocaust | Nazi Germany | Jews and others | 1941-1945 |
| Cambodian Genocide | Khmer Rouge | Intellectuals, minorities | 1975-1979 |
| Rwandan Genocide | Hutu extremists | Tutsi and moderate Hutu | 1994 |
7.9
Causation in Global Conflict
Topic 7.9 is a synthesis skill topic, not a new content block. It asks you to rank and explain the relative significance of causes of global conflict from 1900 to the present. You are connecting militarism, alliances, imperialism, nationalism, economic crisis, and unresolved tensions into a defensible argument about which mattered most and why.
- Relative significance: The AP skill of explaining which cause was most important requires you to compare causes, not just list them; you need evidence that one factor had broader or deeper effects than others.
- Technology as a cause: Rapid advances in military technology, from machine guns to atomic bombs, changed the scale and nature of conflict and made wars more destructive, amplifying other causes.
- Nationalism and ideology: Across WWI, WWII, and mass atrocities, nationalist and ideological extremism repeatedly transformed political tensions into mass violence.
- Economic instability: The Great Depression destabilized democratic governments and created conditions for fascist and authoritarian movements to gain power, linking economic crisis directly to WWII's causes.
- Continuity across conflicts: Unresolved tensions from WWI directly caused WWII; patterns of imperial control, nationalist resistance, and ideological competition continued across the entire 1900-present period.
Write a thesis that argues for the relative significance of one cause of global conflict from 1900 to the present, using evidence from at least two different conflicts.
Practice AP World unit 7 questions
Try AP-style multiple-choice questions and written prompts after you review the notes.
QuestionDecolonization movements gained momentum after World War II, as nationalist leaders in Africa and Asia demanded independence from weakened European empires. What historical context made the post-1945 period particularly favorable for successful independence movements?
European powers emerged from WWII economically exhausted and militarily overstretched, while nationalist movements had gained organizational strength and international support for self-determination
Newly independent nations in Latin America provided military assistance to African and Asian independence movements
The development of advanced communication technology allowed colonized peoples to coordinate resistance across continents
The Soviet Union's ideological commitment to anti-imperialism made it the primary supporter of all independence movements worldwide
QuestionStalin's forced collectivization in Ukraine (1932-1933) and the Khmer Rouge's agrarian revolution in Cambodia (1975-1979) both resulted in mass death through state-imposed policies targeting rural populations. What common ideological pattern connects these two atrocities?
Utopian social engineering that targeted 'enemies' and enforced violent collectivization.
Severe droughts caused agricultural collapse and triggered emergency rationing.
External Western pressure compelled rapid industrialization via collectivization.
Redistribution aimed to abolish feudal landholding, not primarily mass murder.
"For a nation-state to play an active role in the world, its most essential requirement is a favorable national defense position. As American economic power advances, the United States will become the champion of the Western peoples. Our country must resist the encroachments of Russia to the north as it simultaneously confronts British and American power to the south. Northern Manchuria is of strategic value to Japan. If our country brings northern Manchuria under its influence, Russia will find it extremely difficult to advance to the east. It will not be difficult to block Russia simply by building up our strength in Manchuria and Mongolia. If our country is relieved of its burden to the north, it can then make bold plans for China and the South Sea region. The Manchuria-Mongolia region is of enormous strategic importance with respect to the destiny and development of our country. If the Manchuria-Mongolia region is brought under our influence, then our control over Korea will be stabilized. If our country shows firm determination in resolving the Manchuria-Mongolia problem through force, it can assume a position of leadership toward China; it can promote China's unity and stability; and it can guarantee peace in the East."
Kanji Ishiwara, Japanese army officer stationed in Manchuria, "Personal Opinion on the Manchuria-Mongolia Problem," essay written in 1931, shortly before he masterminded the diplomatic crisis that led to the Japanese occupation of Manchuria
A.Identify ONE strategic rationale Ishiwara provides in the passage for Japanese control over Manchuria and Mongolia.
B.Explain ONE way Ishiwara's 1931 essay reflects the broader pattern of Japanese territorial expansion in the interwar period.
C.Explain ONE continuity in imperial state control over colonial holdings between the period 1900 to 1931 that is reflected in Ishiwara's argument.
Respond to parts A, B, and C.
Evaluate the extent to which governments expanded their role in shaping national identity and public life from 1930 to 1972.
In your response you should do the following:
Respond to the prompt with a historically defensible thesis or claim that establishes a line of reasoning.
Describe a broader historical context relevant to the prompt.
Support an argument using at least four of the provided documents.
Use at least one additional piece of specific historical evidence beyond the documents.
For at least two documents, explain how or why the document's point of view, purpose, historical situation, or audience is relevant.
Demonstrate a complex understanding through sophisticated argumentation and/or effective use of evidence.