Per-unit taxes shift marginal cost upward, raising the price consumers pay, lowering the net price firms receive, reducing equilibrium quantity, and creating a tax wedge and deadweight loss. The burden of the tax falls more heavily on whichever side of the market is less elastic. Per-unit subsidies work in reverse, lowering effective cost and increasing quantity. Lump-sum taxes affect only fixed costs, so they do not change marginal cost, output, or price. Binding price ceilings set below equilibrium create shortages; binding price floors set above equilibrium create surpluses. For natural monopolies, marginal-cost pricing achieves allocative efficiency but may require a lump-sum subsidy if price falls below ATC. Average-cost pricing allows the firm to break even without a subsidy but still reduces deadweight loss compared to unregulated monopoly. Antitrust policy addresses market power by preventing mergers or breaking up monopolies.
A per-unit tax is imposed in a perfectly competitive market. Identify who bears more of the tax burden if demand is inelastic relative to supply. Then explain why a lump-sum tax on a monopolist does not change the monopolist's profit-maximizing output.