The New Jersey Plan, proposed at the 1787 Constitutional Convention, called for a single-house legislature where every state got equal representation, plus new congressional powers to tax and regulate commerce. Small states backed it against the Virginia Plan, and the clash produced the Great (Connecticut) Compromise.
The New Jersey Plan was the small states' counteroffer at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. William Paterson of New Jersey proposed keeping a unicameral (one-house) legislature, like the one under the Articles of Confederation, where each state got exactly one vote no matter its size. Delaware and Virginia would be equals on every roll call.
It wasn't just a defense of the status quo, though. The plan also gave Congress explicit powers the Articles lacked, like the power to tax and regulate commerce, and it added a federal executive and judiciary. So the small states agreed the national government needed real muscle. What they refused to accept was the Virginia Plan's population-based representation, which would let big states dominate. That standoff is exactly what the Great (Connecticut) Compromise resolved, splitting the difference with a bicameral Congress.
This term lives in Topic 1.5 (Ratification of the U.S. Constitution) in Unit 1, and it directly supports learning objective AP Gov 1.5.A, which asks you to explain how political negotiation and compromise at the Convention shaped the constitutional system. The CED's essential knowledge lists the Great (Connecticut) Compromise as one of the deals necessary for ratification, and you can't explain that compromise without knowing what it was compromising between. The New Jersey Plan is one half of that fight. Its fingerprint is still on the Constitution today: every state, regardless of population, gets two senators. When you hear that Wyoming and California have equal power in the Senate, that's the New Jersey Plan's argument winning a permanent seat in one chamber.
Keep studying AP® Gov Unit 1
Great (Connecticut) Compromise (Unit 1)
The Great Compromise is the deal that ended the New Jersey vs. Virginia Plan standoff. The House took the Virginia Plan's population-based representation, and the Senate took the New Jersey Plan's equal-state representation. On the exam, you should be able to name both parent plans of this compromise.
Bicameral Congress (Unit 1)
The very structure of Congress, two chambers built on two different logics of representation, exists because neither the New Jersey Plan nor the Virginia Plan could win outright. Bicameralism is the compromise made permanent in Article I.
Article V amendment process (Unit 1)
The small states' victory got extra protection in Article V, which says no state can be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate without its consent. That makes equal Senate representation effectively unamendable, the most entrenched piece of the New Jersey Plan's legacy.
Federalist Papers and ratification debates (Unit 1)
The Convention's compromises, including the one the New Jersey Plan forced, had to be defended during ratification. The Federalist Papers sold the finished bargain to skeptical states, so the plan's influence runs straight into the ratification fight covered in Topic 1.5.
The New Jersey Plan shows up most often in multiple-choice questions about the Constitutional Convention's compromises. A classic stem asks which two competing plans the Great Compromise reconciled, and the answer is the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan. Another common trap asks which plan proposed proportional representation in both houses; that's the Virginia Plan, not New Jersey, so you need to keep the two straight. No released FRQ has used the term verbatim, but it's strong evidence for any Concept Application or Argument Essay question about how compromise shaped the constitutional system (LO 1.5.A) or why the Senate represents states equally. Your job is to do more than define it: explain what the plan demanded, who backed it, and what compromise it produced.
These two are the easiest mix-up in Unit 1, so anchor them to state size. The Virginia Plan came from a big state and wanted a bicameral legislature with representation based on population in both houses, which favors big states. The New Jersey Plan came from a small state and wanted a unicameral legislature with equal representation for every state, which protects small states. Memory hook: New Jersey is small, so it fought for the small-state position. The Great Compromise gave each plan one chamber.
The New Jersey Plan, proposed by William Paterson in 1787, called for a one-house Congress where every state had equal representation regardless of population.
It was the small states' answer to the Virginia Plan, which wanted representation based on population in both houses.
The plan still strengthened the national government by giving Congress powers to tax and regulate commerce and by adding a federal executive and judiciary.
The deadlock between the New Jersey and Virginia Plans forced the Great (Connecticut) Compromise, which created a bicameral Congress.
The New Jersey Plan's core idea survives today in the Senate, where every state gets two senators no matter its size.
For LO 1.5.A, use the New Jersey Plan as evidence that the Constitution is a product of negotiation and compromise, not a single blueprint.
It was a proposal at the 1787 Constitutional Convention for a unicameral legislature with equal representation for each state, plus new congressional powers to tax and regulate commerce. Small states backed it to avoid being outvoted by big states under the Virginia Plan.
Not outright, but it didn't fully lose either. The Great (Connecticut) Compromise blended it with the Virginia Plan, so the Senate kept the New Jersey Plan's equal state representation while the House went to population-based representation.
The Virginia Plan wanted a bicameral Congress with representation based on population in both houses, favoring big states. The New Jersey Plan wanted a unicameral Congress with one equal vote per state, protecting small states. Remember it by size: New Jersey is small, so it pushed the small-state position.
No. It kept the Articles' one-state-one-vote structure, but it added real powers the Articles lacked, including the power to tax, regulate commerce, and create a federal executive and judiciary. Even small states agreed the national government needed strengthening.
Yes, it falls under Topic 1.5 and learning objective AP Gov 1.5.A. It usually appears in multiple-choice questions asking which plans the Great Compromise reconciled or which plan demanded equal state representation.
Connect this key term to the AP exam workflow: review the course, practice questions, and check related study tools.
Review units, study guides, and course resources.
Check this vocabulary in multiple-choice context.
Apply key concepts in written AP responses.
Estimate the exam score you are working toward.
Review the highest-yield facts before practice.
Put the full course together before test day.