Art historical interpretation is not fixed. The same work can be read through feminist theory, postcolonial theory, deconstructionist theory, queer theory, or formalism, and each produces a different but defensible argument. Contemporary works are often intentionally open-ended, meaning the artist does not provide a single correct reading. The required works for this topic, The Gates by Christo and Jeanne-Claude and The Crossing by Bill Viola, both invite multiple interpretations. Visual analysis remains the foundation, but scholarship, cultural context, and theoretical frameworks all shape how meaning is constructed and argued.
Apply two different critical theories to The Crossing by Bill Viola. What does each theory emphasize, and how do the interpretations differ?