Skip to main content

Intergroup conflict

Intergroup conflict is the tension, competition, or hostility that develops between different groups in Social Psychology. It often shows up when groups feel threatened by each other's power, status, beliefs, or resources.

Last updated July 2026•Fiveable Content Team

What is intergroup conflict?

Intergroup conflict is what happens when two or more groups start treating each other as rivals instead of neighbors, classmates, teams, or communities. In Social Psychology, the focus is not just on open fighting. It also includes suspicion, prejudice, discrimination, and the stories groups tell about why the other side is dangerous or unfair.

A lot of intergroup conflict starts with group identity. Once people strongly identify with an in-group, they often see the out-group in simpler, harsher terms. That can make ordinary disagreements feel bigger than they are, especially if people think their group is losing status, safety, land, money, or influence.

Resource competition is one major trigger. If two groups believe they cannot both get what they want, competition can quickly turn into hostility. This is where Realistic Conflict Theory fits in, because it explains conflict as a response to real or perceived competition over limited resources.

But groups do not need a real shortage to clash. Historical grievances, stereotypes, and communication breakdowns can keep conflict going even after the original problem changes. People may interpret the same event in opposite ways depending on which group they belong to, which makes compromise harder.

Social Psychology also looks at how conflict can be reduced. Shared goals, contact under the right conditions, and cooperation can lower tension because people start seeing one another as partners instead of enemies. The classic Robbers Cave Experiment is a useful example because it showed both the rise of group conflict and the way cooperation can cool it down.

In class, you will usually see intergroup conflict as part of a bigger pattern: group formation leads to stronger identity, identity can create us-versus-them thinking, and that thinking can shape behavior toward outsiders.

Why intergroup conflict matters in Social Psychology

Intergroup conflict shows you how Social Psychology connects identity, prejudice, and group behavior. A lot of real social problems, from school cliques to workplace rivalry to ethnic or political tension, make more sense when you look at how people act as members of groups rather than just as isolated individuals.

It also helps you read classic studies more clearly. Asch, Sherif, and later researchers all showed that group pressure and group goals can change what people say, believe, and do. Intergroup conflict is the bigger pattern underneath those findings: once groups divide into in-groups and out-groups, pressure to conform and defend the group can intensify.

This term is useful for explaining why simple advice like “just get along” usually does not work. If conflict comes from identity threat, unequal power, or competition, then the fix has to address the group relationship itself. That is why shared goals, contact, and norms for cooperation show up so often in social psychology discussions and case examples.

Keep studying Social Psychology Unit 7

Official unit cheatsheet

open one-pager

How intergroup conflict connects across the course

Social Identity Theory

Social Identity Theory explains why people feel attached to their group and why that attachment can turn into bias against outsiders. Intergroup conflict often grows when group membership becomes part of self-esteem, because threats to the group feel personal. This is the identity side of conflict, not just the resource side.

Realistic Conflict Theory

This is one of the clearest explanations for intergroup conflict because it focuses on competition over limited resources. When groups think only one side can win, tension rises fast. Sherif’s work shows that conflict can emerge even among groups that were fine at first, once competition is introduced.

Robbers Cave Experiment

The Robbers Cave Experiment is the classic study that puts intergroup conflict into action. Two boys’ groups became hostile when they competed, then improved when they had to work together on shared goals. It is a simple way to see how group rivalry starts and how cooperation can reduce it.

Norm Formation

Norms can make intergroup conflict worse or better. A group may develop norms that reward hostility, loyalty, or suspicion toward outsiders, which keeps tension alive. But a group can also form norms around fairness, respect, and cooperation, which gives members a different script for dealing with conflict.

Is intergroup conflict on the Social Psychology exam?

A short-answer question or case analysis may ask you to identify why two groups are clashing and connect the situation to competition, identity threat, or group norms. Your job is to name the conflict as intergroup conflict, then explain the cause using Social Psychology language, not just everyday wording. If a passage describes teams, cliques, communities, or political groups, look for signs of in-group favoritism, out-group hostility, and resource competition. In a discussion response, you might also explain how shared goals or structured contact could reduce the tension.

Intergroup conflict vs intragroup conflict

Intergroup conflict happens between different groups, while intragroup conflict happens inside one group. That difference matters because a group can be united against outsiders and still have internal disagreements, or it can be peaceful with other groups but divided within itself.

Key things to remember about intergroup conflict

  • Intergroup conflict is hostility, competition, or tension between different groups in Social Psychology.

  • It often grows when people feel their identity, status, or resources are threatened.

  • The concept is closely tied to in-group favoritism, prejudice, and out-group bias.

  • Realistic Conflict Theory explains conflict from competition over limited resources.

  • Shared goals and cooperation can reduce conflict by changing how groups see each other.

Frequently asked questions about intergroup conflict

What is intergroup conflict in Social Psychology?

Intergroup conflict is tension or hostility between two or more groups. In Social Psychology, it is explained through things like social identity, competition over resources, and stereotypes that make the out-group seem threatening.

What causes intergroup conflict?

Common causes include competition, unequal power, identity threat, and past grievances. Even when there is no real shortage, groups can still clash if they believe the other side is blocking their goals or disrespecting their status.

Is intergroup conflict the same as intragroup conflict?

No. Intergroup conflict happens between separate groups, while intragroup conflict happens inside one group. A team can have internal disagreements without any outside rivalry, or it can unite internally while fighting another team.

How can intergroup conflict be reduced?

Social Psychology often points to shared goals, cooperation, and structured contact as ways to lower tension. When groups have to work together for something they both need, they are more likely to see each other as partners instead of enemies.