2.3 Developing a hypothesis and research questions
2 min read•july 24, 2024
hinges on a strong . Reporters craft specific, that guide their research. They break these down into key questions, covering who, what, when, where, why, and how of the story.
involves , , and . Reporters plan their research, set deadlines, and organize information. They also prepare for challenges like limited access or , always striving for objectivity and balance.
Hypothesis Development and Research Planning
Hypothesis for investigative stories
Top images from around the web for Hypothesis for investigative stories
legal writing: Research question, Hypothesis, Literature Review View original
Is this image relevant?
The Scientific Method | Introduction to Psychology – Lindh View original
Is this image relevant?
The Scientific Method | Introduction to Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
legal writing: Research question, Hypothesis, Literature Review View original
Is this image relevant?
The Scientific Method | Introduction to Psychology – Lindh View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Hypothesis for investigative stories
legal writing: Research question, Hypothesis, Literature Review View original
Is this image relevant?
The Scientific Method | Introduction to Psychology – Lindh View original
Is this image relevant?
The Scientific Method | Introduction to Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
legal writing: Research question, Hypothesis, Literature Review View original
Is this image relevant?
The Scientific Method | Introduction to Psychology – Lindh View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Hypothesis in investigative reporting proposes explanation or prediction about situation or issue serving as central idea to be investigated
- Strong hypothesis remains specific and focused, testable through evidence gathering, relevant to public interest
- Formulation steps involve identifying topic of interest, conducting preliminary research, looking for patterns or inconsistencies, drafting statement encapsulating core idea
- Effective hypotheses examples: "Local government officials misused public funds for personal gain" or "Corporate pollution causing increased health issues in nearby communities"
Key research questions
- break down hypothesis into manageable parts guiding investigative process
- Effective questions stay open-ended, specific and focused, aligned with hypothesis
- Types include Who (key players), What (), When (timeline), Where (locations), Why (), How ()
- Prioritize questions by assessing relevance to hypothesis and feasibility of answering within constraints (time, resources)
Evidence gathering plan
- include documents (public records, internal memos), interviews (on-record, off-record), data analysis, field reporting
- Research methods involve , , social media investigation,
- Create timeline with deadlines for allowing follow-up and verification
- Organize information using digital tools (Evernote, Google Docs) and tracking system for sources and leads
- Consider protecting confidential sources, ensuring accuracy, complying with legal restrictions
Challenges to hypothesis
- Common challenges include , , legal obstacles (gag orders),
- Overcome by developing , collaborating with other reporters, seeking legal counsel
- Identify by considering all , researching , analyzing
- Strengthen investigation by gathering evidence addressing criticisms, seeking , preparing responses to objections
- Maintain objectivity avoiding , pursuing evidence disproving hypothesis, presenting balanced account of findings
Key Terms to Review (29)
Alternative Sources: Alternative sources refer to non-traditional means of gathering information that provide additional perspectives, insights, or data that may not be available through standard channels. These sources can enrich the development of hypotheses and research questions by presenting unique viewpoints, contextual information, or previously underrepresented narratives that traditional sources might overlook.
Confirmation Bias: Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, and remember information in a way that confirms one’s preexisting beliefs or hypotheses. This bias can significantly impact how individuals develop their understanding of issues, as it leads them to favor information that supports their views while ignoring or dismissing contradictory evidence.
Counterarguments: Counterarguments are opposing viewpoints or objections that challenge the main argument being presented. They play a crucial role in developing a well-rounded hypothesis and research questions, as they force the researcher to consider alternative perspectives and strengthen their position by addressing potential criticisms.
Data analysis: Data analysis is the systematic process of inspecting, cleansing, transforming, and modeling data to discover useful information, inform conclusions, and support decision-making. This process is essential for understanding complex information, making connections between variables, and revealing patterns that are critical for effective communication in various forms of reporting.
Database searches: Database searches are systematic inquiries made within a structured collection of data that allow researchers to find and retrieve specific information or records. These searches are essential in developing hypotheses and research questions, as they provide the foundation of evidence upon which further inquiry is built, leading to informed conclusions and insights.
Documents: Documents are written or printed materials that provide information or evidence, often serving as primary sources in research. In the context of developing a hypothesis and research questions, documents can include anything from official reports and academic articles to personal letters and historical records, each offering unique insights that can shape a researcher's inquiry.
Ethical aspects: Ethical aspects refer to the principles and considerations that guide the moral conduct of individuals and organizations, especially in research contexts. These aspects emphasize integrity, accountability, and respect for the rights and welfare of participants, aiming to ensure that research is conducted responsibly and transparently. Understanding ethical aspects is crucial when developing a hypothesis and research questions to maintain trust and credibility in the research process.
Evidence Gathering: Evidence gathering is the systematic process of collecting information and data to support a claim or hypothesis. This process is crucial in the development of research questions, as it helps determine the direction of an inquiry and the validity of potential answers. It involves using various methods to collect reliable and relevant data, which serves as the foundation for drawing conclusions and making informed decisions.
Evidence Types: Evidence types refer to the various forms of data or information that can be used to support or refute a hypothesis or research question. These types can range from qualitative data, such as interviews and observations, to quantitative data, like statistics and surveys, each providing different insights into the research topic. Understanding these evidence types is crucial for developing robust research questions and hypotheses, as they directly influence how the research is conducted and interpreted.
Expert Validation: Expert validation is the process of seeking the insights and opinions of specialists in a particular field to assess the credibility, accuracy, and relevance of research hypotheses or questions. This method helps ensure that the proposed ideas are grounded in established knowledge and practice, which enhances the reliability of the research findings.
Financial Document Analysis: Financial document analysis involves the examination and interpretation of financial statements and documents to assess the financial health and performance of an organization. This analysis helps in making informed decisions, identifying trends, and uncovering potential issues related to a business's financial status, which is crucial when developing hypotheses and research questions.
Hypothesis: A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon that can be tested through research and experimentation. It acts as a foundation for developing research questions and guides the direction of a study, helping researchers determine the relationship between variables and predict outcomes.
Hypothesis weaknesses: Hypothesis weaknesses refer to the limitations or flaws that can undermine the reliability and validity of a hypothesis in research. These weaknesses can manifest in various ways, such as vague language, lack of specificity, or failure to account for confounding variables, which can ultimately affect the research outcomes and conclusions drawn from the study. Understanding these weaknesses is crucial for developing strong hypotheses and research questions that effectively guide the research process.
Interviews: Interviews are a qualitative research method where one person asks questions to another in order to gather information, insights, or personal experiences. This approach is vital for understanding complex issues, exploring diverse perspectives, and gathering in-depth data, making it a key tool for forming hypotheses and framing research questions while also complementing both primary and secondary research techniques.
Investigative Reporting: Investigative reporting is a form of journalism that involves in-depth investigation into specific issues, often uncovering hidden truths or exposing wrongdoing. This type of reporting is characterized by extensive research, interviewing, and fact-checking to provide comprehensive and accurate stories that hold power accountable. It often seeks to answer pressing questions about public interest matters, making it essential for democracy and transparency.
Legal obstacles: Legal obstacles are barriers or challenges that arise from laws, regulations, or legal frameworks, which can impede the process of gathering information or conducting research. These obstacles can restrict access to certain data, limit the scope of inquiry, or impose specific legal requirements that must be adhered to when developing research questions and hypotheses.
Limited information access: Limited information access refers to the restrictions or barriers that individuals or groups face when trying to obtain necessary data or insights. This concept is crucial in research, as it can significantly impact the development of hypotheses and research questions, ultimately affecting the quality and scope of the study.
Methods: Methods refer to the systematic techniques and procedures used to gather and analyze data in order to test hypotheses or answer research questions. They are crucial in shaping how research is conducted, influencing the reliability and validity of findings. Different methods can yield varied results, thus selecting appropriate methods is essential for achieving credible outcomes.
Motivations: Motivations refer to the underlying reasons or driving forces that prompt individuals or groups to act in certain ways or pursue specific goals. In the context of developing hypotheses and research questions, understanding motivations is crucial as it helps researchers identify what influences behaviors, decisions, and outcomes, guiding the direction of their inquiry and shaping the hypotheses they formulate.
Open-ended questions: Open-ended questions are inquiries that allow for a wide range of responses, encouraging detailed answers rather than simple 'yes' or 'no' replies. They foster deeper conversation and enable interviewers to gather extensive information, making them essential for extracting insights from reluctant or hostile sources, encouraging detailed responses that lead to critical information, and facilitating exploratory research.
Opposing Viewpoints: Opposing viewpoints refer to differing perspectives or opinions on a particular issue or topic, often highlighting contrasting evidence, interpretations, and conclusions. This concept is essential in research and inquiry as it encourages critical thinking, allows for a more comprehensive understanding of complex issues, and aids in the development of informed hypotheses and research questions.
Public Records Requests: Public records requests are formal inquiries made by individuals or organizations to access documents and information held by government agencies. These requests are grounded in the principle of transparency, allowing citizens to obtain data that can inform their understanding of government actions and decisions. They play a vital role in investigative journalism, helping reporters gather evidence and verify facts while also shaping research questions and hypotheses around public accountability and governance.
Research Phases: Research phases refer to the distinct stages that guide researchers through the systematic process of inquiry, typically involving the identification of a problem, development of hypotheses or research questions, data collection, analysis, and interpretation. These phases are crucial as they provide a structured framework that helps ensure the research is thorough and coherent, ultimately leading to valid conclusions and insights.
Research Questions: Research questions are specific queries that guide a research project, defining the focus and direction of the study. They help researchers clarify what they aim to investigate and establish the scope of their inquiry, ultimately informing the methodology and framework for data collection and analysis.
Resource limitations: Resource limitations refer to the constraints imposed by the availability of financial, human, and material resources that can impact the ability to conduct research or journalism effectively. These limitations can influence the scope and depth of investigations, potentially affecting the quality and comprehensiveness of the findings. Understanding these constraints is crucial in developing research hypotheses and measuring the societal impact of investigative journalism, as they can shape the questions posed and the potential for achieving meaningful outcomes.
Specific Events: Specific events refer to particular occurrences or incidents that are defined by their unique characteristics, timing, and context. These events serve as focal points for investigation and analysis in research, helping to formulate hypotheses and research questions that drive deeper inquiry into the underlying causes and effects.
Stakeholder perspectives: Stakeholder perspectives refer to the viewpoints, interests, and concerns of individuals or groups that are affected by or can affect a particular project, decision, or issue. Understanding these perspectives is crucial in developing hypotheses and research questions because it ensures that the inquiry considers diverse viewpoints, leading to more comprehensive and relevant outcomes.
Testable Ideas: Testable ideas are concepts or propositions that can be examined through observation or experimentation, allowing researchers to gather evidence to support or refute them. These ideas are crucial in the scientific process as they guide the formulation of hypotheses and research questions that can be systematically investigated.
Time Constraints: Time constraints refer to the limitations imposed on the duration available for completing a task, such as conducting research or writing a report. These constraints can affect the depth and breadth of investigation, influencing the formulation of hypotheses and research questions, and ultimately shaping the outcomes of research efforts.