upgrade
upgrade
👥AP Research Unit 3 Vocabulary

20 essential vocabulary terms and definitions for Unit 3 – Evaluate Multiple Perspectives

Study Unit 3
Practice Vocabulary
👥Unit 3 – Evaluate Multiple Perspectives
Topics

👥Unit 3 – Evaluate Multiple Perspectives

3.1 Identifying, comparing, and interpreting different perspectives on, or arguments about, an issue

TermDefinition
ambiguousIdeas or perspectives that are unclear, open to multiple interpretations, or lacking a single definitive meaning.
argumentA reasoned position supported by evidence and logic to convey a perspective, point of view, or version of the truth.
assumptionUnderlying beliefs or premises that are taken for granted without proof or verification.
backgroundThe combination of an individual's experiences, culture, and education that influences their perspective on an issue.
competing perspectivesMultiple viewpoints that vie for acceptance or validity, each presenting different interpretations or solutions.
complementary perspectivesPerspectives that differ but work together to provide a more complete understanding of an issue.
concurring perspectivesPerspectives that agree or align with one another on an issue.
perspectiveAn individual's point of view on an issue, shaped by their background, experiences, culture, education, assumptions, and worldview.
worldviewA comprehensive perspective or set of beliefs through which an individual interprets and understands the world and issues within it.

3.2 Evaluating objections, implications, and limitations of different perspectives or arguments

TermDefinition
alternate perspectivesDifferent viewpoints or positions that differ from the primary or mainstream argument being considered.
assumptionUnderlying beliefs or premises that are taken for granted without proof or verification.
competing perspectivesMultiple viewpoints that vie for acceptance or validity, each presenting different interpretations or solutions.
core valuesFundamental beliefs and principles that are central to a person's worldview and decision-making.
critical thinkersIndividuals who analyze arguments and information carefully, considering multiple perspectives and evaluating evidence objectively.
emotional appealsArguments that attempt to persuade by evoking feelings or emotions rather than relying on logic or evidence.
implicationThe potential consequences, applications, or broader significance of research findings.
limitationConstraints, boundaries, or weaknesses in research methodology, data, or scope that affect the validity or applicability of conclusions.
logicThe system of reasoning used to evaluate the validity and coherence of arguments.
opposing perspectivesViewpoints that directly contradict or stand in contrast to another argument or position.
personal biasesPreconceived preferences or prejudices that influence how a person perceives and evaluates information.