Metacom's War (also called King Philip's War, 1675-1676) was a conflict in New England in which Wampanoag leader Metacom led an alliance of American Indian groups against British colonists over land, resources, and political boundaries, ending with the destruction of Native power in southern New England.
Metacom's War, which the English called King Philip's War, broke out in 1675 when Metacom, a Wampanoag leader, organized an alliance of New England tribes to push back against decades of English expansion. By the 1670s, English settlers had taken huge amounts of Native land, their livestock trampled Native cornfields, and colonial courts increasingly claimed authority over Native people. Metacom saw that accommodation was failing and chose armed resistance.
The war was brutal on both sides. Native forces destroyed or attacked dozens of English towns, and per capita it was one of the deadliest wars in American history. But by 1676 the colonists, helped by Native allies, had crushed the alliance and killed Metacom. The result reshaped the region. Native political and military power in southern New England was effectively broken, survivors were killed, enslaved, or pushed out, and English settlement expanded with far less resistance. The CED names it directly as the prime example of how British conflicts with American Indians over land, resources, and political boundaries led to military confrontation.
This term lives in Unit 2 (Colonial Development, 1607-1754), Topic 2.5, and it supports learning objective APUSH 2.5.A, which asks you to explain how and why interactions between European nations and American Indians changed over time. Metacom's War is your go-to British example of that change. Early Wampanoag-English relations involved real accommodation (think of Massasoit's alliance with Plymouth in the 1620s), but by 1675 that relationship had collapsed into total war. That arc from cooperation to conflict is exactly the change-over-time story the exam rewards. It also pairs with the Pueblo Revolt in the essential knowledge as evidence that Native resistance to European colonization happened across regions, not just in one colony's backyard. Thematically, it hits Migration and Settlement and America in the World, since it shows how competition for land drove violence.
Keep studying APUSH Unit 2
Pequot War (Unit 2)
The Pequot War (1636-1638) and Metacom's War are New England's bookend conflicts. Both started over land and resources and both ended with devastating Native losses. Exam questions love comparing them, so know the pattern they form together: English expansion, Native resistance, English victory, more expansion.
Pueblo Revolt (Unit 2)
The CED puts these two side by side on purpose. Metacom's War is Native resistance to the British in New England; the Pueblo Revolt (1680) is Native resistance to the Spanish in the Southwest. Same decade, same cause (colonial pressure on Native land and culture), different empire. That makes them a perfect comparison pair for APUSH 2.5.A.
Covenant Chain (Unit 2)
Not every Native-English relationship ended in war. The Covenant Chain alliance between the English and the Iroquois shows the accommodation side of the CED's 'accommodation and conflict' framing. In fact, Iroquois (Mohawk) attacks on Metacom's forces helped the English win, which proves Native groups made their own strategic choices about European alliances.
Fur Trade (Unit 2)
The fur trade explains why French and Dutch relations with Native peoples looked different from English relations. The French wanted trading partners; the English wanted land. Metacom's War is what happens when the land-hungry model hits its breaking point, which is the core contrast Topic 2.5 wants you to draw.
Metacom's War shows up most often in multiple-choice questions, and they usually test one of four skills. Causation questions ask why the Wampanoag and their allies attacked in 1675 (answer: cumulative loss of land, resources, and political autonomy). Comparison questions pair it with the Pequot War, where both reflect conflict driven by English expansion. Change-over-time questions ask how colonial policy toward Native Americans hardened after the war. And turning-point questions ask why 1676 matters (it ended large-scale Native resistance in southern New England). No released FRQ has used the term verbatim, but it is strong evidence for short-answer and essay prompts about Native-European relations under APUSH 2.5.A, especially continuity-and-change arguments comparing British, French, and Spanish patterns of interaction.
Both are New England wars between English colonists and Native groups, so they blur together fast. Keep the timeline straight. The Pequot War (1636-1638) came first and nearly wiped out the Pequot early in colonization. Metacom's War (1675-1676) came almost forty years later, involved a multi-tribe alliance led by Metacom, and was the last major Native effort to stop English expansion in the region. Think of the Pequot War as an early warning and Metacom's War as the final showdown.
Metacom's War (1675-1676), also called King Philip's War, was a conflict between New England colonists and an alliance of Native groups led by Wampanoag leader Metacom.
The war was caused by disputes over land, resources, and political boundaries, which is the exact language the CED uses for British-Native conflict.
The English victory destroyed Native political and military power in southern New England and opened the region to unchecked English expansion.
The war marks a turning point from earlier accommodation (like the Wampanoag-Plymouth alliance) to permanent conflict, a classic change-over-time example for APUSH 2.5.A.
Pair it with the Pueblo Revolt (1680) to show that Native resistance to European colonization happened across different regions and against different empires in the late 17th century.
Metacom's War (1675-1676) was a war in New England between English colonists and a Native alliance led by Wampanoag leader Metacom, fought over land, resources, and political boundaries. The English won, and Native power in southern New England was broken.
Yes, they are the same war. 'King Philip' was the English name for Metacom, and the College Board's CED uses both names: Metacom's War (King Philip's War). Either name is correct on the exam.
The Pequot War (1636-1638) happened roughly forty years earlier and targeted one tribe, the Pequot. Metacom's War (1675-1676) was a coordinated, multi-tribe alliance and was the last major Native resistance effort in southern New England. Both, though, were driven by English expansion onto Native land.
No, only in southern New England. It ended large-scale Native resistance in that region, but resistance continued elsewhere, including the Pueblo Revolt against the Spanish in 1680 and ongoing conflicts in other regions through later units.
Decades of English expansion had taken Wampanoag land, colonial livestock destroyed Native crops, and English courts increasingly claimed authority over Native people. Metacom concluded that the accommodation strategy of his father Massasoit's generation had failed, so he built a tribal alliance to resist by force.
Connect this key term to the AP exam workflow: review the course, practice questions, and check related study tools.
Review units, study guides, and course resources.
Check this vocabulary in multiple-choice context.
Apply key concepts in written AP responses.
Estimate the exam score you are working toward.
Review the highest-yield facts before practice.
Put the full course together before test day.