FRQ 3 always gives you a non-required case and asks you to compare it to one of the 15 required cases. You need to know the constitutional issue, the ruling, and the reasoning for each required case. The question summary tells you everything about the non-required case, so your job is to identify which required case shares the same constitutional principle and explain both the similarity and a difference.
- Required case: One of the 15 Supreme Court cases explicitly listed in the AP Gov course that you must know for FRQ 3 and MCQ questions
- Non-required case: The unfamiliar case provided in the FRQ 3 prompt; all information you need about it is in the question
- Constitutional principle: The shared legal or governmental concept (e.g., First Amendment, commerce clause, due process) that connects the two cases
Without notes, can you state the constitutional issue and ruling for McCulloch v. Maryland, Tinker v. Des Moines, and McDonald v. Chicago? Those three cover federalism, free speech, and incorporation, which are frequent comparison targets.
| Case | Constitutional area | Key ruling |
|---|
| Marbury v. Madison | Judicial review | Established the Supreme Court's power to strike down unconstitutional laws |
| McCulloch v. Maryland | Federalism / necessary and proper clause | Federal government has implied powers; states cannot tax federal institutions |
| Tinker v. Des Moines | First Amendment / student speech | Students do not shed constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate |
| McDonald v. Chicago | Second Amendment / incorporation | Second Amendment applies to state and local governments via the 14th Amendment |
| Citizens United v. FEC | First Amendment / campaign finance | Political spending by corporations is protected free speech |