upgrade
upgrade

🏭American Business History

Significant Labor Laws Regulations

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

When you study American business history, you're really studying the ongoing tension between capital and labor, individual rights and collective action, and market freedom and government regulation. These labor laws aren't just dates to memorize—they represent turning points where society decided that certain workplace conditions were unacceptable and that workers deserved specific protections. Understanding the historical context that produced each law helps you see how economic crises, social movements, and political shifts drove regulatory change.

You're being tested on your ability to connect these laws to broader themes: How did the Great Depression reshape the government's role in labor relations? Why did the postwar period bring a conservative backlash against unions? How have civil rights movements expanded the definition of workplace fairness over time? Don't just memorize what each law does—know why it emerged when it did and what principle it represents.


New Deal Foundations: Establishing Worker Rights

The Great Depression exposed the vulnerability of American workers and created political momentum for fundamental change. These foundational laws established that the federal government had a legitimate role in protecting workers from employer exploitation and ensuring basic economic security.

National Labor Relations Act (Wagner Act) of 1935

  • Guaranteed workers' right to organize—for the first time, federal law protected collective bargaining as a fundamental labor right
  • Created the NLRB (National Labor Relations Board) to oversee union elections and investigate unfair labor practices by employers
  • Prohibited employer retaliation against workers for union activities, shifting power dynamics in American workplaces

Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938

  • Established the federal minimum wage and 40-hour workweek—creating the basic framework for wage-and-hour law still in effect today
  • Mandated overtime pay at 1.5 times regular wages for hours exceeding 40 per week
  • Restricted child labor by setting minimum age requirements and limiting hours for minors, ending widespread exploitation

Compare: Wagner Act vs. FLSA—both emerged from New Deal reform, but Wagner focused on collective worker power (unions), while FLSA established individual worker protections (wages, hours). FRQs often ask how these complementary approaches reshaped labor-management relations.


Postwar Rebalancing: Limiting Union Power

The immediate postwar period saw a conservative reaction to the growth of organized labor. Business interests and their political allies argued that unions had become too powerful and that their tactics threatened economic stability and national security.

Taft-Hartley Act of 1947

  • Restricted union activities by prohibiting secondary boycotts, jurisdictional strikes, and closed shops—a direct rollback of Wagner Act protections
  • Required anti-Communist affidavits from union leaders, reflecting Cold War anxieties about labor radicalism
  • Allowed states to pass "right-to-work" laws prohibiting mandatory union membership, fundamentally weakening union organizing in many regions

Compare: Wagner Act vs. Taft-Hartley—these represent the pendulum swing in American labor policy. Wagner (1935) empowered unions during the Depression; Taft-Hartley (1947) constrained them during postwar prosperity. Know this tension for any question about the evolution of labor relations.


Expanding Workplace Equality: Civil Rights Era and Beyond

Beginning in the 1960s, the definition of worker protection expanded beyond wages and union rights to include equal treatment regardless of personal characteristics. These laws reflect the influence of civil rights movements on workplace regulation.

Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII)

  • Banned employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin—transforming hiring, promotion, and compensation practices
  • Created the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) to investigate complaints and enforce anti-discrimination provisions
  • Applied to employers with 15+ employees, establishing federal oversight of workplace equality across most of the private sector

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990

  • Extended civil rights protections to disabled individuals in employment, public accommodations, and transportation
  • Required reasonable accommodations from employers—modifications that enable qualified workers to perform essential job functions
  • Defined disability broadly to include physical and mental impairments that substantially limit major life activities

Compare: Title VII vs. ADA—both prohibit discrimination, but ADA goes further by requiring employers to take affirmative steps (reasonable accommodations) rather than simply treating everyone identically. This distinction matters for understanding the evolution of anti-discrimination law.


Workplace Safety and Benefits: Protecting Worker Welfare

These laws addressed the physical and financial security of workers beyond wages and discrimination. They reflect growing recognition that employers have responsibilities for worker well-being that extend throughout employment and into retirement.

Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) of 1970

  • Created OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) to set and enforce workplace safety standards
  • Required employers to provide hazard-free workplaces—shifting responsibility for safety from workers to management
  • Established inspection authority and penalties for violations, giving federal regulators real enforcement power

Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974

  • Set minimum standards for private pension plans, protecting workers from mismanaged or underfunded retirement benefits
  • Established fiduciary duties requiring plan managers to act in participants' best interests
  • Created the PBGC (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation) to insure pension benefits if plans fail

Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) of 1993

  • Guaranteed 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave for childbirth, adoption, or serious health conditions
  • Required continuation of health benefits during leave, preventing workers from losing coverage during family emergencies
  • Applied to employers with 50+ employees, leaving many small-business workers without coverage

Compare: OSHA vs. ERISA—both protect worker welfare, but through different mechanisms. OSHA addresses immediate physical safety during employment; ERISA protects long-term financial security after employment ends. Both reflect expanding definitions of employer responsibility.


Antitrust Foundations: Regulating Market Competition

While not strictly "labor laws," these antitrust statutes fundamentally shaped the environment in which labor relations developed. They established the government's authority to regulate business practices and, importantly, determined whether labor unions themselves could be prosecuted as illegal combinations.

Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890

  • Prohibited monopolies and restraints of trade—the first federal law asserting government authority over corporate consolidation
  • Initially used against unions as "combinations in restraint of trade," demonstrating how business-friendly courts could weaponize reform legislation
  • Provided basis for trust-busting under Theodore Roosevelt and later administrations

Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914

  • Explicitly exempted labor unions from antitrust prosecution—a crucial victory for organized labor after courts used Sherman against strikes
  • Prohibited specific anti-competitive practices including price discrimination, exclusive dealing, and anti-competitive mergers
  • Strengthened FTC authority to investigate and prevent unfair business practices before they became monopolies

Compare: Sherman Act vs. Clayton Act—Sherman (1890) was vague enough that courts applied it against workers; Clayton (1914) specifically protected unions and clarified prohibited business practices. This evolution shows how legislative refinement responds to judicial interpretation.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
New Deal worker protectionsWagner Act (1935), FLSA (1938)
Union power restrictionsTaft-Hartley Act (1947)
Workplace anti-discriminationTitle VII (1964), ADA (1990)
Physical safety regulationOSHA (1970)
Retirement/benefits securityERISA (1974)
Work-life balanceFMLA (1993)
Antitrust and labor exemptionsSherman Act (1890), Clayton Act (1914)
Regulatory agencies createdNLRB, EEOC, OSHA, PBGC, FTC

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two laws represent the "pendulum swing" in federal policy toward organized labor, and what historical contexts explain their opposing approaches?

  2. How did the Clayton Act (1914) change the relationship between antitrust law and labor unions compared to the Sherman Act (1890)?

  3. Compare Title VII and the ADA: both prohibit discrimination, but how do their requirements for employers differ in significant ways?

  4. If an FRQ asked you to explain how the New Deal transformed the federal government's role in labor relations, which two laws would you use as primary evidence, and why?

  5. OSHA, ERISA, and FMLA all protect worker welfare but address different aspects of employment. How would you categorize what each law protects, and what do they reveal about expanding definitions of employer responsibility over time?