Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Metacognition—thinking about your own thinking—is the foundation of effective critical thinking and independent learning. When you're tested on critical thinking skills, you're not just being asked to solve problems; you're being evaluated on your ability to monitor your reasoning, adjust your approach when something isn't working, and reflect on why certain strategies succeed or fail. These skills separate surface-level learners from deep thinkers who can transfer knowledge across contexts.
The strategies in this guide fall into interconnected categories: planning, monitoring, evaluating, and adapting. Understanding how these processes work together helps you become a self-directed learner who doesn't just follow instructions but actively manages your own cognitive resources. Don't just memorize these strategy names—know when to deploy each one and how they reinforce each other in the learning cycle.
These strategies build the foundation of metacognition by helping you understand how you learn before you can improve it. Self-awareness is the prerequisite for all other metacognitive work.
Compare: Self-reflection vs. Self-evaluation—both involve looking back at your work, but reflection focuses on process (how you approached it) while evaluation focuses on product (how well you did). Strong critical thinkers use both: evaluate the outcome, then reflect on the process that led there.
Before engaging with content, effective learners create structures that guide their efforts. Front-loading cognitive work through planning reduces mental load during execution.
Compare: Goal setting vs. Planning—goals define what you want to achieve; planning defines how you'll get there. An FRQ might ask you to explain why someone who sets goals but doesn't plan often fails to achieve them. The answer: goals without plans lack actionable steps.
These strategies operate during learning, providing real-time feedback that allows you to adjust course. Think of them as your cognitive GPS—constantly recalculating based on current position.
Compare: Self-monitoring vs. Self-regulation—monitoring is detection (noticing you're confused or off-track), while regulation is correction (doing something about it). Both are necessary: monitoring without regulation identifies problems but doesn't solve them; regulation without monitoring means you don't know when to intervene.
These strategies transform passive exposure into deep understanding by requiring you to do something with information rather than just receive it.
Compare: Elaboration vs. Summarizing—elaboration expands information by adding connections and examples, while summarizing condenses it to core ideas. Use elaboration when learning new concepts (build understanding), and summarizing when reviewing (consolidate and organize).
These strategies directly support critical thinking by structuring how you approach challenges and gaps in understanding.
Compare: Question generation vs. Problem-solving—question generation is divergent (opening up inquiry), while problem-solving is convergent (narrowing toward solutions). Critical thinking requires both: generate questions to explore the problem space, then apply problem-solving to reach conclusions.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Building self-awareness | Metacognitive awareness, Self-reflection, Self-evaluation |
| Front-loading cognitive work | Goal setting, Planning and organizing, Time management |
| Real-time adjustment | Self-monitoring, Self-regulation, Cognitive flexibility |
| Deep processing | Active learning strategies, Elaboration techniques |
| Information management | Summarizing and note-taking, Memory techniques |
| Structured inquiry | Question generation, Problem-solving strategies |
| Emotional management | Self-regulation, Cognitive flexibility |
| Transfer and application | Elaboration techniques, Active learning strategies, Problem-solving |
Which two strategies both involve looking back at your learning, and how do they differ in focus—one on process, one on product?
A student sets a goal to "understand chemistry better" but never achieves it. Which metacognitive strategy is missing, and what specific actions would that strategy involve?
Compare self-monitoring and self-regulation: if a student notices they're confused during a lecture but does nothing about it, which strategy are they using and which are they failing to use?
You're learning a complex new concept and want to ensure deep understanding rather than surface memorization. Which two active processing strategies would be most effective, and why do they work better together than alone?
Explain how metacognitive awareness functions as a "master strategy" that enables the effective use of all other metacognitive strategies. What happens when someone lacks this awareness?