Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Corporate scandals aren't just sensational headlines—they're windows into the structural weaknesses of American capitalism and the regulatory frameworks designed to contain them. When you study these cases, you're really studying corporate governance failures, regulatory capture, market psychology, and the evolution of business ethics. Each scandal triggered specific reforms, from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to Dodd-Frank, and understanding which scandal prompted which response is essential for connecting cause and effect on exams.
Don't just memorize company names and dollar amounts. Know what type of fraud each scandal represents and what systemic vulnerability it exposed. Ask yourself: Was this an accounting manipulation? Executive theft? Regulatory failure? Consumer deception? The categories matter more than the chronology, because FRQs will ask you to compare scandals by mechanism or explain how one scandal's reforms failed to prevent another.
These scandals involve companies deliberately misrepresenting their financial health to investors and regulators. The core mechanism is the same: executives manipulate numbers to hide losses, inflate assets, or create the illusion of profitability.
Compare: Enron vs. WorldCom—both used accounting tricks to deceive investors, but Enron hid liabilities while WorldCom inflated assets. Both led to Sarbanes-Oxley, making them essential examples if an FRQ asks about early 2000s corporate reform.
These cases involve corporate leaders treating company assets as personal piggy banks. Unlike accounting fraud, which deceives external parties, self-dealing involves direct misappropriation of funds by insiders.
Compare: Tyco vs. Madoff—both involved executives enriching themselves, but Tyco was internal theft from a legitimate company while Madoff's entire business was fraudulent from the start. Tyco exposed board governance problems; Madoff exposed regulatory incompetence.
These scandals didn't just harm individual companies—they threatened the entire financial system. Excessive leverage, interconnected risk, and "too big to fail" institutions created cascading failures.
Compare: Lehman Brothers vs. Enron—both involved hidden leverage and accounting manipulation, but Enron's collapse was contained to one company while Lehman's triggered systemic contagion. This distinction matters for questions about systemic risk vs. firm-specific fraud.
These scandals involve companies lying to customers about what they're actually buying. The fraud occurs at the product level rather than the financial statement level, often involving safety or performance claims.
Compare: Volkswagen vs. Theranos—both deceived customers about product performance, but VW had a real product that was made to cheat tests, while Theranos had no working product at all. VW is environmental fraud; Theranos is securities fraud wrapped in healthcare promises.
These scandals reveal how internal pressure and misaligned incentives push employees toward unethical behavior. The fraud is systemic rather than the work of a few bad actors.
Compare: Wells Fargo vs. Enron—both involved corporate cultures that rewarded results over ethics, but Wells Fargo fraud was decentralized (thousands of employees) while Enron fraud was centralized (executive-level schemes). Wells Fargo shows how bad incentives corrupt ordinary workers.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Accounting/Financial Statement Fraud | Enron, WorldCom, Wirecard |
| Executive Self-Dealing | Tyco, Madoff |
| Systemic Risk/Financial Crisis | Lehman Brothers |
| Consumer/Product Deception | Volkswagen, Theranos, Boeing |
| Toxic Incentive Structures | Wells Fargo, Enron |
| Regulatory Failure | Madoff (SEC), Boeing (FAA), Wirecard (BaFin) |
| Sarbanes-Oxley Catalysts | Enron, WorldCom, Tyco |
| Post-2008 Reform Drivers | Lehman Brothers, Madoff |
Both Enron and WorldCom triggered the Sarbanes-Oxley Act—what specific type of accounting manipulation did each use, and how did SOX address these problems?
Compare the regulatory failures in the Madoff Ponzi scheme and the Boeing 737 MAX crisis. What different forms did "regulatory capture" or incompetence take in each case?
If an FRQ asked you to explain how corporate culture contributes to fraud, which two scandals would you compare, and what would you emphasize about their incentive structures?
Distinguish between scandals that harmed investors primarily (through financial statement fraud) versus those that harmed consumers primarily (through product deception). Give two examples of each.
The Theranos and Enron scandals both involved charismatic leaders who convinced sophisticated investors to ignore warning signs. What does this pattern reveal about the limits of market discipline in preventing fraud?