Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Information architecture (IA) models are the invisible scaffolding that determines whether users glide through your product or rage-quit in frustration. You're being tested on your ability to select the right structural approach for different user needs, content types, and interaction patterns—not just recognize model names. Exam questions will push you to analyze when a hierarchical structure fails, why a faceted system outperforms a linear one, and how hybrid approaches solve real design problems.
These models connect directly to core HCI principles: mental models, cognitive load, wayfinding theory, and information scent. When you encounter an FRQ asking you to design or critique a navigation system, you need to instantly recognize which architectural pattern fits the use case. Don't just memorize definitions—know what user behavior and content characteristics each model serves best.
These models impose a clear organizational logic that guides users through predetermined pathways. The key principle: reduce cognitive load by limiting choices and creating predictable patterns.
Compare: Hierarchical vs. Hub and Spoke—both organize content into categories, but hierarchical allows deep drilling while hub-and-spoke keeps users tethered to a central point. If an FRQ presents a scenario with users getting "lost" in deep navigation, hub-and-spoke is often the fix.
These architectures handle content that changes frequently or requires complex querying. The underlying principle: separate content structure from presentation to enable flexible retrieval.
Compare: Database Model vs. Content Model—database models focus on storage and retrieval mechanics, while content models focus on semantic meaning and reusability. Both are essential for CMS design, but content models drive editorial strategy while database models drive technical implementation.
When content can be meaningfully organized in multiple ways simultaneously, these models let users choose their own path. Core principle: support diverse mental models by offering multiple entry points to the same content.
Compare: Matrix vs. Faceted Classification—both support multi-dimensional navigation, but matrix models present dimensions as a fixed grid while faceted models let users progressively add filters. Faceted scales better for large datasets with many attributes.
These architectures embrace non-linear connections where content items link freely based on relationships rather than categories. Key principle: mirror real-world complexity where items belong to multiple contexts simultaneously.
Compare: Network Model vs. Wayfinding Model—network models emphasize content relationships, while wayfinding models emphasize user orientation. A knowledge base might use network architecture for content connections but wayfinding principles for the navigation interface.
Real-world products rarely use a single pure model. These approaches acknowledge that different user needs and content types require different structural solutions within the same system.
Compare: Hybrid Model vs. any single model—hybrid approaches acknowledge that user behavior varies by context. The exam often presents scenarios where a "pure" approach fails; your job is to identify which combination solves the problem.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Reducing cognitive load through structure | Hierarchical, Linear/Sequential, Hub and Spoke |
| Supporting dynamic/changing content | Database Model, Content Model |
| Multi-attribute navigation | Matrix, Faceted Classification |
| Non-linear exploration and discovery | Network Model |
| User orientation in complex spaces | Wayfinding Model |
| Task-specific architecture | Linear/Sequential (processes), Hub and Spoke (dashboards) |
| Flexible real-world implementation | Hybrid Model |
| E-commerce and filtering | Faceted Classification, Matrix |
A user testing session reveals that users frequently get "lost" after drilling three levels deep into a documentation site. Which two models would you consider combining to address this, and why?
Compare and contrast the Faceted Classification Model and the Hierarchical Model—what types of content and user behavior does each best support?
An FRQ describes a social learning platform where users need to discover related courses, follow instructors, and see connections between topics. Which model provides the strongest foundation, and what supporting model might enhance user orientation?
Why would a checkout flow use a Linear/Sequential Model even though it limits user freedom? Connect your answer to cognitive load principles.
A client wants to redesign their recipe website. Users currently browse by meal type (hierarchical) but testing shows they want to filter by ingredients, cook time, and dietary restrictions. Which model addresses this need, and how does it differ from their current approach?