Key Democratic Principles

Why This Matters

Democratic principles aren't just abstract ideals—they're the structural framework that political scientists use to evaluate whether governments actually serve their people. You're being tested on your ability to explain how these principles function together as a system, not just define them in isolation. Exam questions will ask you to analyze scenarios where principles conflict, reinforce each other, or break down entirely.

Think of these principles as falling into three categories: legitimacy (where does government authority come from?), limitation (how do we prevent abuse of power?), and participation (how do citizens engage with governance?). When you understand which category each principle belongs to, you can answer comparative questions with confidence. Don't just memorize definitions—know what problem each principle solves and what happens when it fails.

---

Foundations of Legitimacy

These principles answer the most fundamental question in political science: why should anyone obey the government? Democratic theory argues that legitimate authority flows upward from citizens, not downward from rulers.

Popular Sovereignty

• The people are the ultimate source of government authority—this distinguishes democracies from monarchies and autocracies at the most basic level
• Consent of the governed means citizens authorize government actions, typically expressed through voting and civic participation
• Government legitimacy is conditional—when rulers lose public support, their authority becomes democratically illegitimate

Free and Fair Elections

• Elections translate popular sovereignty into practice—without them, "consent of the governed" remains purely theoretical
• Procedural requirements include universal suffrage, secret ballots, impartial administration, and transparent vote counting
• Electoral integrity determines whether outcomes actually reflect public will or merely manufacture the appearance of consent

---

Limiting Government Power

Democratic systems assume that power tends toward abuse. These principles create structural barriers against tyranny by distributing authority and subjecting it to rules.

Rule of Law

• No one is above the law—this applies equally to ordinary citizens, elected officials, and heads of state
• Arbitrary governance (decisions based on personal whim rather than established rules) is prohibited, creating predictability and fairness
• Constitutional supremacy means even legislatures cannot pass laws that violate fundamental legal principles

Separation of Powers

• Government authority is divided among executive, legislative, and judicial branches—each with distinct functions and independent operation
• Prevents concentration of power that historically enabled authoritarianism, following Montesquieu's influential theory
• Horizontal accountability means branches answer to each other, not just to voters

Checks and Balances

• Each branch can limit the others' actions—vetoes, judicial review, impeachment, and confirmation powers are common examples
• Designed to create friction that slows government action, making dramatic power grabs difficult
• Requires negotiation and compromise between branches, which can enhance deliberation but also cause gridlock

---

Protecting Rights and Pluralism

Democracies must balance majority rule with protections for individuals and minorities. These principles ensure that winning elections doesn't grant unlimited power over those who voted differently.

Individual Rights and Liberties

• Fundamental freedoms limit what government can do even with majority support—speech, religion, assembly, and due process are typically protected
• Equal protection under law prevents discrimination and ensures consistent application of rights across groups
• Rights function as "trump cards" (in Ronald Dworkin's phrase) that override ordinary policy preferences

Freedom of Expression

• Citizens can criticize government without fear of punishment—this distinguishes democracies from authoritarian systems most visibly
• Enables informed citizenship by allowing open debate, investigative journalism, and access to diverse viewpoints
• Includes unpopular speech that majorities might prefer to silence, creating inherent tension with democratic decision-making

Majority Rule with Minority Rights

• Decisions follow majority preference while constitutional protections prevent oppression of outvoted groups
• Prevents "tyranny of the majority"—a central concern for democratic theorists from Madison to Tocqueville
• Requires institutional safeguards like judicial review, supermajority requirements, and enumerated rights

---

Ensuring Participation and Accountability

Democracy requires ongoing citizen engagement and mechanisms to hold officials responsible. These principles keep government responsive between elections.

Political Pluralism

• Multiple parties and interest groups compete for influence, preventing any single faction from monopolizing power
• Diverse representation ensures that various social, economic, and ideological perspectives participate in governance
• Strengthens legitimacy by giving citizens meaningful choices and channels for political engagement

Transparency and Accountability

• Government actions must be visible to public scrutiny—through open meetings, freedom of information laws, and independent media
• Officials answer for their decisions through elections, oversight hearings, and legal consequences for misconduct
• Prevents corruption by making it difficult to hide self-dealing, incompetence, or abuse of authority

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two principles work together to translate the theory of citizen authority into practice? What happens to legitimacy if one exists without the other?

2. A president claims emergency powers allow them to bypass legislative approval. Which principles does this potentially violate, and how do they differ in their protective function?

3. Compare and contrast separation of powers with checks and balances. Why do democratic systems need both, and what distinct problem does each solve?

4. If a democratically elected majority votes to ban a minority religion, which principles conflict? How do constitutional democracies typically resolve this tension?

5. An FRQ asks you to explain how democracies prevent corruption. Which principles would you discuss, and how do they complement each other as a system?