Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Algebraic equations aren't just abstract symbols—they're the language mathematicians and scientists use to describe how quantities relate to each other. In Contemporary Mathematics, you're being tested on your ability to recognize which type of equation models which type of situation and how to solve each one efficiently. Whether you're calculating loan payments, predicting population growth, or optimizing resources, the equation type you choose determines your approach.
Here's the key insight: every equation type has a signature behavior. Linear equations show constant change, quadratics model acceleration or optimization, and exponentials capture rapid growth or decay. Don't just memorize formulas—understand what each equation does and when to reach for it. That conceptual understanding is what separates students who struggle from those who breeze through word problems and applications.
These equations model situations where change happens at a steady, predictable pace. The defining feature is that equal changes in the input always produce equal changes in the output.
Compare: Linear equations vs. inequalities—both involve the same algebraic manipulation, but equations give you a point while inequalities give you a region. If a problem asks for "at least" or "no more than," you need an inequality.
These equations model situations involving acceleration, area, optimization, or complex multi-factor relationships. The curves reflect how the rate of change itself changes.
Compare: Quadratics vs. higher-degree polynomials—quadratics always form parabolas with exactly one turning point, while cubics and beyond can wiggle multiple times. When a problem involves a single maximum or minimum, think quadratic first.
These equations capture situations where quantities increase or decrease by a percentage rather than a fixed amount. The key feature is that the rate of change is proportional to the current value.
Compare: Exponential vs. logarithmic equations—they're inverse operations. If you're solving for the exponent (like "how long until my investment doubles?"), you need logarithms. If you're calculating the final amount, use exponentials. Master converting between them.
These equation types require extra care because they can produce invalid or extraneous solutions. Always check your answers against the original equation.
Compare: Rational vs. radical equations—both require checking for extraneous solutions, but for different reasons. Rational equations have domain restrictions (no zero denominators), while radical equations can gain false solutions through squaring. Always plug your answers back in.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Constant rate of change | Linear equations, systems of equations |
| Optimization (max/min) | Quadratic equations, inequalities |
| Percentage-based change | Exponential equations, logarithmic equations |
| Inverse operations | Exponential ↔ logarithmic |
| Multiple possible solutions | Absolute value, polynomial equations |
| Domain restrictions | Rational equations, logarithmic equations |
| Extraneous solution risk | Radical equations, rational equations |
| Range of values | Inequalities |
Which two equation types are inverses of each other, and how would you decide which one to use in a compound interest problem asking for the time to reach a goal?
Compare quadratic equations and linear equations: what does the graph of each look like, and what type of real-world rate of change does each model?
Both rational and radical equations can produce extraneous solutions. What causes this issue in each type, and what step must you always take after solving?
If a problem describes a quantity that "doubles every 5 years," which equation type would you use? What if the problem said the quantity "increases by $500 every year"?
You're solving a system of linear equations and get no solution. What does this tell you about the graphs of the two equations, and what real-world scenario might this represent?