Why This Matters
When you study advertising campaigns, you're really studying how brands shape culture—and how culture shapes brands right back. These campaigns aren't just clever slogans; they're case studies in positioning strategy, audience segmentation, emotional appeals, and cultural disruption. Your exam will test whether you understand why certain campaigns broke through, how they leveraged media and timing, and what principles made them effective beyond their original run.
Don't just memorize taglines and dates. Know what each campaign illustrates about advertising theory: Is it an example of counter-positioning? Viral mechanics? Cause marketing? When you can identify the underlying strategy, you can apply these concepts to any campaign—including ones you've never seen before. That's what separates a memorizer from someone who actually understands how advertising works.
Counter-Positioning: Challenging the Status Quo
The most memorable campaigns often succeed by rejecting industry conventions. Instead of competing on the same terms as rivals, these brands redefined what consumers should value—forcing competitors to play catch-up.
"Think Small" – Volkswagen (1959)
- Pioneered "anti-advertising" by using white space and self-deprecating copy when competitors screamed about size and power
- Targeted an underserved segment—practical, intellectually curious consumers who rejected postwar excess
- Established Doyle Dane Bernbach's creative revolution, proving that honesty and wit could outsell hard-sell tactics
"1984" – Apple Macintosh (1984)
- Positioned IBM as Big Brother without naming them, framing Apple as the liberator of individual creativity
- Single-airing strategy during the Super Bowl created scarcity and massive earned media coverage
- Set the template for event advertising, proving a 60-second spot could function as cultural moment rather than product pitch
"Where's the Beef?" – Wendy's (1984)
- Direct competitive attack that mocked rivals' product quality without legal liability—implied comparison at its finest
- Clara Peller's authenticity as an elderly everywoman made the critique feel populist rather than corporate
- Entered political discourse when Walter Mondale used it against Gary Hart, demonstrating true cultural penetration
Compare: "Think Small" vs. "1984"—both positioned their brands as rebels against industry giants, but Volkswagen used quiet wit while Apple deployed cinematic spectacle. If an FRQ asks about counter-positioning strategies, these two show the range from minimalist to maximalist execution.
Emotional Branding: Selling Feelings Over Features
These campaigns understood that consumers don't buy products—they buy what products mean. By connecting to universal emotions, these brands transcended their product categories entirely.
"Just Do It" – Nike (1988)
- Three-word imperative that shifted focus from athletic gear to personal empowerment and self-actualization
- Inclusive positioning welcomed non-athletes into the brand, massively expanding the target market
- Emotional benefit over functional benefit—you're not buying shoes, you're buying your best self
"Priceless" – Mastercard (1997)
- Inverted credit card messaging from spending power to emotional value, differentiating from Visa's transactional focus
- Formulaic structure (item: price, item: price, experience: priceless) created infinite adaptability across cultures and contexts
- Long-running platform proved that emotional positioning sustains better than product-focused campaigns
"I'd Like to Buy the World a Coke" – Coca-Cola (1971)
- Vietnam-era counterprogramming offered unity and peace when America was deeply divided
- Diverse casting was revolutionary for 1971, positioning Coke as a global brand above national conflicts
- Song-first strategy led to "I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing" becoming a pop hit—earned media before the term existed
Compare: "Just Do It" vs. "Priceless"—both sell emotional benefits, but Nike's approach is aspirational (become better) while Mastercard's is reflective (appreciate what matters). Know the difference between motivational and sentimental appeals.
Humor and Virality: Engineering Shareability
Before "viral" was a marketing term, these campaigns understood that entertainment value drives word-of-mouth. They prioritized being talked about over being informative.
"Whassup?" – Budweiser (1999)
- Authentic dialogue lifted from a short film captured real friendship dynamics, not scripted ad-speak
- Catchphrase engineering made the greeting instantly recognizable and infinitely repeatable
- User-generated parodies extended campaign reach organically—early proof of participatory culture in advertising
"The Man Your Man Could Smell Like" – Old Spice (2010)
- Dual-audience targeting spoke directly to women (purchasers) while entertaining men (users)
- Real-time response videos during the campaign created unprecedented social media engagement
- Brand resurrection proved that legacy brands could reinvent for younger demographics through tone, not product changes
"Dumb Ways to Die" – Metro Trains Melbourne (2012)
- Entertainment-first public service prioritized shareability over lecturing, reaching audiences who'd ignore traditional PSAs
- Transmedia extension into games and merchandise sustained engagement beyond the initial video
- Global reach for local issue—a Melbourne train safety campaign became an international case study in viral mechanics
Compare: "Whassup?" vs. "Dumb Ways to Die"—both achieved virality through entertainment, but Budweiser captured organic behavior while Metro Trains deliberately engineered shareability. The difference between discovered authenticity and designed virality is key for understanding how viral strategies evolved.
Visual Identity and Minimalism: The Power of Consistency
Some campaigns succeed not through narrative but through relentless visual repetition. These brands understood that recognition can be more valuable than persuasion.
Absolut Vodka Bottle Campaign (1980s–1990s)
- Product-as-hero strategy made the distinctive bottle shape the entire creative concept
- Artistic collaborations with Warhol and Haring elevated the brand to cultural artifact status
- Template advertising allowed infinite variations while maintaining instant brand recognition
"Clap On, Clap Off" – The Clapper (1984)
- Demonstration-based creative showed the product benefit in the tagline itself—form follows function
- Jingle memorability ensured the product name was inseparable from its use case
- Direct response integration combined brand advertising with immediate call-to-action—rare for TV at the time
Compare: Absolut vs. The Clapper—both built campaigns around product form, but Absolut pursued sophistication and cultural credibility while The Clapper prioritized clarity and direct response. Same strategy, opposite executions for opposite audiences.
Cause Marketing and Social Messaging: Brands Taking Stands
These campaigns tied brand identity to social values, understanding that consumers increasingly choose brands that reflect their beliefs. This approach carries both opportunity and risk.
"Dove Real Beauty" Campaign (2004)
- Category disruption rejected beauty industry conventions by featuring non-models and unretouched photography
- Research-backed positioning used Dove's global study on beauty perceptions to ground the campaign in credibility
- Ongoing platform evolved from ads to workshops and self-esteem programs, deepening brand authenticity
"The Truth" Anti-Smoking Campaign (2000)
- Counter-marketing strategy used tobacco settlement funds to expose industry manipulation tactics
- Youth-centric tone avoided parental lecturing in favor of rebellious, anti-corporate messaging
- Measurable impact contributed to documented declines in youth smoking rates—rare provable ROI for social campaigns
"Got Milk?" – California Milk Processor Board (1993)
- Deprivation strategy showed consequences of not having milk rather than benefits of drinking it
- Celebrity extensions with milk mustache portraits created collectible cultural moments
- Commodity branding proved that even generic products can build distinctive brand identity through advertising
Compare: "Dove Real Beauty" vs. "The Truth"—both challenged industry practices, but Dove worked within the beauty industry to reform it while "The Truth" attacked the tobacco industry from outside. Know the difference between reform positioning and opposition positioning in cause marketing.
Cultural Icon Creation: Building Lasting Brand Symbols
Some campaigns create characters or images so powerful they become inseparable from the brand—and sometimes outlive the product's relevance entirely.
"The Marlboro Man" – Philip Morris (1954)
- Masculine repositioning transformed a filtered cigarette (originally marketed to women) into a symbol of rugged independence
- Aspirational identity transfer let smokers borrow the cowboy's freedom and toughness through product association
- Ethical case study demonstrates advertising's power to normalize harmful behavior—essential for understanding industry regulation
Compare: "The Marlboro Man" vs. "Dove Real Beauty"—both created powerful identity associations, but one promoted harmful behavior while the other challenged harmful standards. These two campaigns bookend the ethical spectrum of advertising's cultural influence.
Quick Reference Table
|
| Counter-positioning | "Think Small," "1984," "Where's the Beef?" |
| Emotional branding | "Just Do It," "Priceless," "I'd Like to Buy the World a Coke" |
| Humor/Virality | "Whassup?," "Old Spice," "Dumb Ways to Die" |
| Visual identity | Absolut, The Clapper |
| Cause marketing | "Dove Real Beauty," "The Truth," "Got Milk?" |
| Icon creation | "The Marlboro Man" |
| Competitive attack | "Where's the Beef?," "1984" |
| Brand resurrection | Old Spice, Volkswagen |
Self-Check Questions
-
Both "Think Small" and "1984" used counter-positioning against industry giants. How did their executions differ, and what does each approach reveal about matching creative strategy to brand personality?
-
Which three campaigns best illustrate emotional benefit over functional benefit? What specific emotions did each target?
-
Compare "The Marlboro Man" and "Dove Real Beauty" as examples of advertising's cultural influence. How would you use these two campaigns in an FRQ about advertising ethics?
-
"Whassup?" and "Dumb Ways to Die" both achieved viral success over a decade apart. What changed about viral mechanics between 1999 and 2012, and how did each campaign reflect its era's media landscape?
-
If asked to identify a campaign that successfully repositioned a commodity product, which would you choose and why? What principles from that campaign could apply to other commodity categories?