study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Mutual assured destruction

from class:

Soviet Union – 1817 to 1991

Definition

Mutual assured destruction (MAD) is a military strategy that asserts that if two opposing sides both possess the capability to destroy each other with nuclear weapons, the result is a stalemate where neither side would initiate a conflict. This concept was central during the Cold War, as it influenced the behavior of superpowers in crises, particularly in avoiding direct confrontation and maintaining a precarious peace.

congrats on reading the definition of mutual assured destruction. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. MAD emerged during the Cold War as both the U.S. and the Soviet Union built extensive nuclear arsenals, leading to a doctrine where full-scale nuclear war would result in total annihilation on both sides.
  2. The Cuban Missile Crisis highlighted the principle of MAD, as the threat of nuclear retaliation prevented either side from escalating military actions to avoid catastrophic consequences.
  3. MAD relied heavily on the idea of credible second-strike capability, meaning that each side needed to maintain enough nuclear weapons to retaliate even after being attacked.
  4. Political leaders during the Cold War often used MAD as justification for arms control negotiations, recognizing that while it deterred war, it also maintained an unstable and dangerous status quo.
  5. The concept of MAD contributed to the era of Détente, where improved relations and treaties aimed to reduce tensions were seen as essential to prevent nuclear conflict.

Review Questions

  • How did mutual assured destruction influence decision-making during key Cold War events?
    • Mutual assured destruction significantly influenced decision-making during critical Cold War events by promoting restraint among superpowers. For instance, during the Cuban Missile Crisis, both the United States and the Soviet Union recognized that any aggressive action could lead to catastrophic nuclear retaliation. This understanding led to careful negotiation and ultimately de-escalation of tensions, showcasing how MAD functioned as a deterrent against direct military confrontation.
  • Evaluate how mutual assured destruction shaped U.S. and Soviet military policies in the context of arms control agreements.
    • Mutual assured destruction shaped U.S. and Soviet military policies by creating a foundation for arms control agreements such as SALT (Strategic Arms Limitation Talks). Both sides acknowledged that while they needed sufficient nuclear capabilities for deterrence, excessive stockpiling posed existential risks. Thus, arms control became essential in managing their arsenals and fostering stability, illustrating how MAD shifted focus from accumulation to strategic restraint.
  • Critically analyze the effectiveness of mutual assured destruction as a strategy for maintaining peace during the Cold War, considering its potential drawbacks.
    • Mutual assured destruction was effective in maintaining a tense peace during the Cold War by deterring direct conflict between superpowers. However, its reliance on the threat of total annihilation raised concerns about accidental launches and miscommunications, which could have catastrophic results. Moreover, as more countries developed nuclear capabilities, MAD's effectiveness became questionable due to the complexities introduced by multiple nuclear states, potentially undermining global security and stability.

"Mutual assured destruction" also found in:

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.