Generalized conversational implicature

Definition

Generalized conversational implicature refers to the meaning that is implied in a conversation based on common knowledge or shared context, without the need for specific circumstances to be stated. It operates on the assumption that speakers follow cooperative principles, which allow listeners to infer additional meanings beyond what is explicitly said, leading to a more nuanced understanding of communication.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. Generalized conversational implicature does not depend on particular situations; instead, it relies on the speaker's intention and the listener's ability to infer meaning from common conversational norms.
2. An example of generalized conversational implicature can be seen in the statement 'Some cats are playful.' This may imply that not all cats are playful without explicitly stating it.
3. This type of implicature differs from particularized implicature, which depends on specific contextual clues or prior knowledge about the conversation.
4. Generalized conversational implicature often aligns with Grice's cooperative principle, suggesting that effective communication relies on shared expectations about how to engage in conversation.
5. Listeners usually recognize generalized conversational implicatures easily because they draw on their understanding of social norms and typical patterns of speech.

Review Questions

• How does generalized conversational implicature enhance the understanding of everyday conversations?
  • Generalized conversational implicature enhances understanding by allowing listeners to grasp meanings that go beyond the literal words spoken. For instance, when someone says 'It's cold in here,' it may imply a request to close a window or turn up the heat. This understanding relies on shared social norms and expectations about communication, helping people navigate conversations more effectively.
• Discuss how generalized conversational implicature differs from particularized implicature and provide examples of each.
  • Generalized conversational implicature relies on common knowledge and general assumptions that apply broadly in conversations, while particularized implicature depends on specific contextual information unique to a given situation. For example, saying 'The meeting starts at 10' generally implies attendees should arrive on time (generalized), whereas saying 'It's time to go' at a dinner might imply someone should leave now based on the context of the evening (particularized).
• Evaluate the role of Grice's Maxims in understanding generalized conversational implicature within human communication.
  • Grice's Maxims play a crucial role in understanding generalized conversational implicature by outlining the cooperative principles that speakers and listeners typically follow. These maxims—quantity, quality, relevance, and manner—guide individuals in inferring additional meanings from conversations. When speakers adhere to these maxims, listeners can effectively decode implications without needing explicit statements, thereby enriching interpersonal communication and ensuring clarity.

Related terms

Grice's Maxims: A set of conversational principles proposed by H.P. Grice that guide effective communication, including maxim of quantity, quality, relevance, and manner.

contextual implicature: Meaning that is derived from the specific context of a conversation rather than general or universal assumptions.

implicature: The additional meaning or message implied by a speaker in a conversation that goes beyond the literal meaning of their words.