Miller Test

Definition

The Miller Test is a legal standard used to determine whether material is obscene and therefore not protected by the First Amendment. This test establishes a three-part criteria focusing on whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work appeals to prurient interests, depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. This standard is essential for understanding issues related to prior restraint and censorship as well as obscenity and indecency in broadcasting.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. The Miller Test was established in the 1973 Supreme Court case Miller v. California, which set a new standard for determining obscenity.
2. The test emphasizes local community standards, meaning what may be considered obscene can vary from one place to another.
3. All three prongs of the Miller Test must be satisfied for material to be classified as obscene; if any one prong fails, the material is protected under the First Amendment.
4. The Miller Test has been crucial in numerous cases dealing with pornography and adult content on various media platforms, influencing laws and regulations.
5. The criteria outlined in the Miller Test has led to ongoing debates about freedom of expression versus societal norms regarding obscenity.

Review Questions

• How does the Miller Test differ from previous standards for determining obscenity?
  • The Miller Test shifted the focus from a national standard to a local community standard for assessing obscenity. Prior to this test, decisions about what constituted obscene material were often based on broader societal norms. The introduction of this three-part criteria emphasized the importance of local perceptions of prurience and offensiveness, making it more flexible and responsive to diverse community values.
• Discuss how the Miller Test impacts prior restraint cases in media law.
  • The Miller Test impacts prior restraint cases by establishing clear criteria for what constitutes obscenity, which is not protected under the First Amendment. In cases where authorities attempt to censor or restrain content based on obscenity claims, courts will apply the Miller Test to evaluate whether the material truly meets all three prongs. If it does not qualify as obscene under this test, then any attempt at prior restraint could be seen as an unconstitutional infringement on free speech rights.
• Evaluate the implications of the Miller Test for modern media content regulation and censorship.
  • The implications of the Miller Test for modern media content regulation are significant as it continues to shape how courts approach issues of obscenity in an increasingly digital world. The reliance on community standards raises questions about consistency and fairness in enforcement across different regions. Moreover, as new forms of media emerge, such as social media platforms and streaming services, the applicability of the Miller Test becomes more complex. Evaluating content through this lens forces regulators to balance protecting community morals while upholding free speech principles in a diverse society.

Related terms

Obscenity:

A category of speech that is not protected by the First Amendment due to its offensive nature, often determined by the Miller Test.

Prior Restraint:

A legal doctrine that prohibits government actions preventing speech or publication before it occurs, relevant in discussions of obscenity.

First Amendment:

The constitutional amendment that protects freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition the government.