Class Action Fairness Act

Definition

The Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) is a federal law enacted in 2005 aimed at increasing the fairness and efficiency of class action lawsuits, particularly those involving interstate commerce. It allows federal courts to have jurisdiction over class action cases that meet certain criteria, such as when the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million and the parties are from different states. CAFA was created to address concerns that plaintiffs were often favored in state courts, leading to potentially unfair outcomes in multi-state class action suits.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. CAFA shifts jurisdiction from state courts to federal courts for many class action lawsuits, aiming to create a more consistent legal framework.
2. Under CAFA, class actions that involve more than 100 members and have an aggregate claim exceeding $5 million can be heard in federal court.
3. The Act requires defendants to notify the federal court of any proposed settlement so that the court can review its fairness and adequacy.
4. CAFA has been instrumental in reducing the number of class actions filed in state courts, as many plaintiffs now prefer federal venues.
5. The Act's implementation has led to significant changes in how attorneys approach class action cases, including strategic considerations about where to file.

Review Questions

• How does the Class Action Fairness Act influence the jurisdictional landscape of class action lawsuits?
  • The Class Action Fairness Act significantly alters the jurisdictional landscape by shifting many class action lawsuits from state courts to federal courts. This is primarily because CAFA allows federal jurisdiction over class actions where the total amount in controversy exceeds $5 million and involves parties from different states. By facilitating this transfer, CAFA aims to ensure a more uniform application of law across jurisdictions, addressing concerns about potential biases found in state courts.
• Discuss the implications of CAFA on plaintiffs and defendants in class action lawsuits.
  • The Class Action Fairness Act has considerable implications for both plaintiffs and defendants in class action lawsuits. For plaintiffs, it provides access to a federal court system that may offer a more predictable legal environment and potentially fairer outcomes. However, it can also lead to increased complexity and costs associated with federal litigation. For defendants, CAFA may reduce exposure to what they perceive as potentially biased state court rulings, but it could also mean facing litigation in a more formal and rigorous federal system where legal strategies must be recalibrated.
• Evaluate how the Class Action Fairness Act addresses issues of fairness and efficiency in multi-state class action lawsuits.
  • The Class Action Fairness Act seeks to improve both fairness and efficiency in multi-state class action lawsuits by establishing clear criteria for when these cases can be heard in federal court. By allowing for a uniform standard under federal jurisdiction, CAFA reduces discrepancies that arise from varying state laws and procedural rules. This not only enhances the fairness of judicial outcomes by providing a neutral forum but also streamlines litigation processes, making it easier for courts to manage large-scale cases that affect numerous plaintiffs across multiple states.

Related terms

Diversity Jurisdiction:

A type of jurisdiction allowing federal courts to hear cases where the parties are from different states, which is a key feature of CAFA.

Federal Jurisdiction: The legal authority of federal courts to hear cases, often invoked under CAFA for class action lawsuits.

Multi-State Class Action: A class action lawsuit involving plaintiffs from multiple states, which CAFA seeks to regulate more effectively.