Communications Decency Act

Definition

The Communications Decency Act (CDA) is a U.S. law enacted in 1996 that aimed to regulate online content, particularly obscene and indecent material. It sought to protect minors from exposure to inappropriate content on the internet while also addressing issues of liability for online platforms regarding user-generated content. The CDA has been a significant point of reference in discussions about free speech and the responsibilities of internet service providers.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. The CDA was one of the first attempts by the U.S. government to regulate content on the internet and included provisions intended to protect children from harmful material.
2. Section 230 of the CDA has been pivotal in shaping the internet landscape by allowing websites to host user content without fear of being liable for what users post.
3. Many provisions of the CDA were struck down by the Supreme Court in 1997 for violating the First Amendment, especially those related to indecent speech.
4. The CDA continues to influence current debates about online content moderation, censorship, and the balance between protecting free speech and preventing harm.
5. Recent discussions around misinformation and fake news have brought renewed attention to the CDA's implications for regulating online platforms and holding them accountable for user behavior.

Review Questions

• How does Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act shape the responsibilities of online platforms regarding user-generated content?
  • Section 230 provides significant legal protection for online platforms, meaning they cannot be held liable for what users post. This encourages platforms to allow free expression while moderating content without fear of being sued. The provision has been fundamental in shaping how social media and other websites operate, as it empowers them to focus on user engagement rather than legal concerns.
• Discuss the impact of the Communications Decency Act on efforts to regulate obscene and indecent material online.
  • The Communications Decency Act aimed to limit access to obscene and indecent material online, especially for minors. However, many provisions were deemed unconstitutional, leading to an ongoing debate about how best to balance protecting children with upholding free speech. This has resulted in fragmented approaches across different states and platforms, complicating enforcement efforts.
• Evaluate how recent challenges concerning misinformation relate back to the goals of the Communications Decency Act and its implications for modern internet governance.
  • Recent challenges around misinformation echo the original intentions of the Communications Decency Act to regulate harmful content while balancing free speech rights. The act's legacy influences current discussions on whether platforms should be held accountable for false information shared by users. As society grapples with issues like viral misinformation and fake news, revisiting the principles set out in the CDA could inform new policies that seek to navigate between protection and freedom in our digital landscape.

Related terms

Section 230: A provision of the Communications Decency Act that provides immunity to online platforms from being held liable for user-generated content, enabling them to host a wide range of material without fear of legal repercussions.

Obscenity: Content that is considered offensive or inappropriate according to community standards, which can be regulated by law and may not be protected by the First Amendment.

Net Neutrality: The principle that internet service providers should treat all data on the internet equally, without discriminating or charging differently by user, content, website, platform, or application.