Latin American Politics

study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Military intervention

from class:

Latin American Politics

Definition

Military intervention refers to the deliberate act of a nation's armed forces being deployed into another country to influence political, social, or economic conditions. This can involve various forms of action, such as combat operations, peacekeeping missions, or support for particular factions within a conflict. In democratic contexts, understanding military intervention includes analyzing the balance of civil-military relations and the implications for democratic governance and civilian control over the military.

congrats on reading the definition of military intervention. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Military interventions can be justified on various grounds, including humanitarian reasons, national security interests, or international obligations to protect human rights.
  2. The effectiveness of military intervention in promoting democracy is often debated, with critics arguing that it can lead to unintended consequences such as destabilization or prolonged conflict.
  3. International law governs military intervention, requiring a clear mandate from organizations like the UN for legitimate actions, although unilateral interventions by states can also occur.
  4. In democratic societies, public opinion plays a significant role in shaping decisions around military intervention, often leading to intense political debate about the use of force.
  5. Civilian control over the military is a critical aspect of democratic governance; therefore, successful military interventions often require clear strategies that respect this principle.

Review Questions

  • How does military intervention challenge or reinforce civil-military relations in democratic societies?
    • Military intervention can both challenge and reinforce civil-military relations in democracies. On one hand, it may undermine civilian authority if the military acts independently or without adequate oversight. On the other hand, effective military intervention requires strong civilian leadership and clear objectives that respect democratic principles, thereby reinforcing the importance of civilian control over the armed forces. This duality emphasizes the need for a well-defined strategy that integrates military actions with democratic values.
  • What are some historical examples of military interventions that had significant impacts on democracy in target countries?
    • Historical examples include the U.S. interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan, which aimed to establish democratic governance but faced criticism for leading to instability and violence. In contrast, NATO's intervention in Kosovo was more positively viewed as it successfully ended ethnic cleansing and led to a degree of democratization. These cases illustrate how military interventions can have varied outcomes depending on local contexts and the level of international support provided post-intervention.
  • Evaluate the ethical implications of military interventions in promoting democracy while considering sovereignty and self-determination.
    • The ethical implications of military interventions raise complex questions about sovereignty and self-determination. While proponents argue that intervening is necessary to protect human rights and promote democracy, critics emphasize the violation of a nation's sovereignty and potential disregard for its people's wishes. Balancing these ethical concerns requires careful consideration of international norms and respect for local agency. Ultimately, any intervention must be guided by both moral imperatives and practical outcomes to ensure that it supports genuine democratic development rather than imposing external agendas.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Guides