study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Non-maleficence

from class:

Intro to Computational Biology

Definition

Non-maleficence is an ethical principle that emphasizes the obligation to not inflict harm intentionally. This principle is fundamental in healthcare and research, guiding professionals to prioritize the well-being of participants and patients by ensuring their safety throughout any procedure or study.

congrats on reading the definition of non-maleficence. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Non-maleficence requires researchers and healthcare providers to actively avoid causing harm to participants, whether physical, psychological, or emotional.
  2. In genomic research, non-maleficence is crucial as it deals with sensitive data that could impact individuals' lives, health, and privacy if mismanaged.
  3. This principle ties closely with informed consent, as participants must understand the potential risks associated with their involvement in research to protect their rights.
  4. Ethical review boards often assess studies to ensure non-maleficence is upheld, providing oversight to minimize any possible harm to participants.
  5. Violations of non-maleficence can lead to significant ethical breaches, legal consequences, and loss of trust in research practices.

Review Questions

  • How does non-maleficence relate to informed consent in genomic research?
    • Non-maleficence directly influences the informed consent process by ensuring that participants are fully aware of potential risks associated with genomic research. By providing comprehensive information about the study's implications and safeguarding against harm, researchers uphold their ethical duty to protect participants. This practice not only fosters trust but also empowers individuals to make informed choices regarding their participation.
  • Discuss the implications of failing to adhere to non-maleficence in genomic studies.
    • Failing to adhere to non-maleficence in genomic studies can lead to severe consequences for participants, including psychological distress or discrimination based on genetic information. Such breaches can tarnish the credibility of the research community and deter future participation in studies. Additionally, it can prompt legal repercussions for researchers and institutions involved, emphasizing the necessity of ethical adherence in all research endeavors.
  • Evaluate how non-maleficence can be balanced with beneficence in genomic research practices.
    • Balancing non-maleficence with beneficence involves weighing the potential benefits of genomic research against the risks of harm to participants. Researchers must strive to maximize positive outcomes while implementing measures to mitigate risks effectively. This may include rigorous ethical reviews and robust participant safeguards. By continuously assessing both principles throughout a studyโ€™s lifecycle, researchers can ensure that they provide meaningful advancements in science while respecting participant welfare.

"Non-maleficence" also found in:

Subjects (64)

ยฉ 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
APยฎ and SATยฎ are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.