Competitive Authoritarianism

Definition

Competitive authoritarianism refers to a type of political regime that combines democratic institutions, such as elections and legislatures, with authoritarian or undemocratic practices that undermine the fairness and integrity of the democratic process. In these regimes, democratic institutions exist but are undermined in ways that give incumbent leaders an unfair advantage over their political opponents.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. Competitive authoritarian regimes often hold regular elections, but these elections are not considered truly free and fair due to factors such as media bias, voter intimidation, and the uneven playing field for opposition candidates.
2. In competitive authoritarian regimes, the incumbent government may use a variety of tactics to maintain power, including the selective application of the rule of law, the manipulation of electoral laws and procedures, and the use of state resources to support the ruling party.
3. Competitive authoritarian regimes may allow some degree of political opposition and civil society activity, but these are often constrained and limited in ways that prevent them from posing a serious challenge to the incumbent government.
4. The rise of competitive authoritarianism has been a global trend in recent decades, with many countries transitioning from outright dictatorship to a more hybrid form of governance that combines democratic and authoritarian elements.
5. Competitive authoritarianism is often seen as a middle ground between full-fledged democracy and outright dictatorship, and it can be a difficult phenomenon to classify and analyze due to its hybrid nature.

Review Questions

• Explain the key features that distinguish competitive authoritarianism from other forms of political regimes.
  • Competitive authoritarianism is characterized by the coexistence of democratic institutions, such as elections and legislatures, with authoritarian practices that undermine the fairness and integrity of the democratic process. Unlike full-fledged democracies, competitive authoritarian regimes employ various tactics to maintain the incumbent government's power, including media bias, voter intimidation, and the uneven playing field for opposition candidates. At the same time, these regimes allow some degree of political opposition and civil society activity, unlike outright dictatorships. This hybrid nature makes competitive authoritarianism a distinct form of political regime that falls between democracy and dictatorship.
• Analyze the factors that contribute to the rise of competitive authoritarianism in recent decades.
  • The rise of competitive authoritarianism has been a global trend in recent decades, driven by a variety of factors. One key factor is the transition of many countries from outright dictatorship to a more hybrid form of governance that combines democratic and authoritarian elements. This transition is often driven by the desire of incumbent governments to maintain power while at the same time appearing to embrace democratic institutions, such as elections and legislatures. Additionally, the selective application of the rule of law, the manipulation of electoral laws and procedures, and the use of state resources to support the ruling party have all contributed to the emergence of competitive authoritarian regimes. The difficulty in classifying and analyzing these hybrid forms of governance has also played a role in their proliferation.
• Evaluate the implications of the rise of competitive authoritarianism for the global democratic landscape and the future of democracy.
  • The rise of competitive authoritarianism poses significant challenges to the global democratic landscape and the future of democracy. While these regimes maintain the facade of democratic institutions, their undermining of the fairness and integrity of the democratic process undermines the core principles of democracy. The selective application of the rule of law, the manipulation of electoral laws and procedures, and the use of state resources to support the ruling party all serve to entrench the power of incumbent governments and limit the ability of opposition forces to mount a meaningful challenge. This, in turn, can lead to the erosion of civil liberties, the weakening of checks and balances, and the concentration of power in the hands of the executive. The proliferation of competitive authoritarian regimes globally may also have broader implications for the global balance of power and the promotion of democratic values on the international stage. Ultimately, the rise of competitive authoritarianism represents a significant threat to the long-term viability of democracy as a system of government.

Related terms

Electoral Authoritarianism: A political system in which democratic institutions, such as multiparty elections, exist but are manipulated by the incumbent regime to ensure its continued rule.

Illiberal Democracy: A political system in which democratic institutions, such as free and fair elections, exist, but civil liberties and the rule of law are curtailed, and the power of the executive is not effectively limited by other branches of government.

Hybrid Regime: A political system that combines elements of democracy and authoritarianism, where democratic institutions and authoritarian practices coexist.