study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Majority voting

from class:

International Organization

Definition

Majority voting is a decision-making process where a choice is approved if it receives more than half of the votes cast. This system is commonly used in various democratic organizations, including key United Nations bodies, to ensure that decisions reflect the will of the majority of member states. The use of majority voting helps streamline decision-making and promotes accountability among members while also potentially marginalizing minority opinions in the process.

congrats on reading the definition of majority voting. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Majority voting is frequently used in the General Assembly of the United Nations for most decisions, requiring a simple majority of member states present and voting.
  2. Certain decisions in the UN Security Council require a supermajority, meaning they need not just majority support but also approval from at least nine out of fifteen members.
  3. Majority voting allows for efficient decision-making, especially in large organizations where reaching consensus can be time-consuming.
  4. The principle of majority voting can lead to tensions between majority rule and minority rights, as it may sideline the views of smaller or less powerful member states.
  5. In many UN organs, abstentions do not count as votes, which means that the majority is calculated only from those who actively participate in the vote.

Review Questions

  • How does majority voting influence decision-making within major United Nations organs like the General Assembly?
    • Majority voting in the General Assembly streamlines decision-making by allowing resolutions to pass with more than half of the votes cast by member states present. This system encourages active participation among members and enables quicker resolutions on various international issues. However, it can also create challenges when minority opinions are overlooked, emphasizing the tension between efficiency and representation in global governance.
  • Discuss the implications of using majority voting versus consensus decision-making in organizations like the United Nations.
    • The use of majority voting in organizations like the United Nations offers efficiency and speed in decision-making but contrasts with consensus decision-making, which prioritizes broader agreement among members. Majority voting can result in quicker resolutions but may marginalize minority voices, while consensus requires collaboration and compromise but can lead to delays. The balance between these two approaches impacts how effectively an organization addresses complex global issues.
  • Evaluate how majority voting affects power dynamics among member states within international organizations such as the UN.
    • Majority voting can significantly shift power dynamics within international organizations by favoring larger or more influential member states that can mobilize votes more effectively. This creates a landscape where decisions may reflect the interests of the majority while potentially neglecting smaller or less powerful nations. Such dynamics highlight the need for safeguards, like supermajority requirements for critical issues, to ensure that essential minority concerns are also considered, ultimately shaping international relations and cooperation.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.