study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Enhanced interrogation techniques

from class:

International Human Rights

Definition

Enhanced interrogation techniques refer to a range of aggressive and controversial methods used by government agencies, particularly during counter-terrorism operations, aimed at extracting information from detainees. These methods are often viewed as violating human rights and ethical standards, leading to significant debate over their legality and morality in the context of national security.

congrats on reading the definition of enhanced interrogation techniques. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Enhanced interrogation techniques became widely discussed after the September 11 attacks in 2001, as U.S. authorities sought new methods to prevent further terrorism.
  2. Methods considered as enhanced interrogation include waterboarding, stress positions, and sleep deprivation, which many critics label as forms of torture.
  3. Legal debates surrounding enhanced interrogation focus on international treaties like the Convention Against Torture, which prohibits torture and inhumane treatment.
  4. Despite justifications provided by some government officials for using enhanced interrogation, numerous studies indicate that these techniques are often ineffective in eliciting reliable information.
  5. The use of enhanced interrogation techniques has led to significant backlash, resulting in calls for accountability and changes in laws governing interrogation practices.

Review Questions

  • Discuss the implications of enhanced interrogation techniques on human rights standards and legal frameworks.
    • Enhanced interrogation techniques challenge human rights standards by raising ethical concerns about the treatment of detainees. These practices often conflict with international human rights laws, such as the Convention Against Torture, which prohibits cruel and inhumane treatment. This tension between national security interests and adherence to human rights creates a complex legal landscape that affects policymaking and accountability.
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of enhanced interrogation techniques compared to traditional interrogation methods in gathering reliable intelligence.
    • Many experts argue that enhanced interrogation techniques do not produce reliable intelligence compared to traditional methods that rely on rapport-building and psychological tactics. Studies have shown that coercive tactics can lead to false information as individuals may say anything to stop the pain or distress. Consequently, intelligence gathered through these means is often questioned regarding its accuracy and usefulness.
  • Assess the long-term consequences of using enhanced interrogation techniques on U.S. foreign relations and global perceptions of American values.
    • The use of enhanced interrogation techniques has had profound long-term consequences on U.S. foreign relations and how America is perceived globally. Critics argue that employing such methods undermines America's position as a champion of human rights and democracy, damaging its moral authority in the world. This perception can lead to strained diplomatic relations with allies who prioritize human rights and create challenges in countering terrorist narratives that exploit perceived hypocrisy in U.S. policies.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.