study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Sender State

from class:

International Conflict

Definition

A sender state refers to a country that imposes economic sanctions or other forms of coercive measures against another state to influence its behavior or policy. The sender state utilizes these tools as part of its foreign policy strategy to achieve specific objectives, often in response to perceived threats or violations of international norms.

congrats on reading the definition of Sender State. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Sender states often utilize economic sanctions as a non-military tool to exert pressure on target states without resorting to armed conflict.
  2. The effectiveness of a sender state's sanctions can depend on international support and the economic resilience of the target state.
  3. Sender states may aim to punish human rights violations, prevent nuclear proliferation, or address terrorism through their sanctions regimes.
  4. The imposition of sanctions can have significant unintended consequences, including humanitarian impacts on civilian populations in the target state.
  5. Diplomatic negotiations may still take place between sender states and target states even when sanctions are in place, showing that these measures can coexist with efforts for dialogue.

Review Questions

  • How do sender states justify the implementation of economic sanctions against target states?
    • Sender states typically justify economic sanctions by citing reasons such as protecting national security, promoting human rights, and enforcing international norms. They argue that sanctions serve as a necessary response to unacceptable behaviors by target states, such as aggression, human rights abuses, or violations of international law. The rationale is that imposing costs on the target will either change its behavior or signal disapproval from the international community.
  • What are some potential drawbacks or criticisms of sender states using economic sanctions as a foreign policy tool?
    • Critics argue that economic sanctions can be counterproductive, often harming civilians more than the political elites they intend to target. Sanctions may lead to increased suffering for ordinary people while enabling government officials to consolidate power by rallying nationalistic sentiments. Additionally, sanctions can strain diplomatic relations and limit opportunities for constructive dialogue between sender and target states.
  • Evaluate the overall impact of sender states' use of economic sanctions on international relations and global stability.
    • The use of economic sanctions by sender states can significantly alter international relations and global stability. While they can serve as tools for enforcing norms and compelling changes in behavior, they also risk escalating tensions between countries. Overreliance on sanctions may lead to a breakdown in diplomatic communications and foster resentment among target states. Ultimately, understanding the nuanced effects of sanctions is crucial for assessing their role in shaping a cooperative or conflict-prone international landscape.

"Sender State" also found in:

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.