Ld

Definition

Lincoln-Douglas debate, often abbreviated as 'ld', is a one-on-one debate format that emphasizes philosophical and ethical issues rather than policy-based discussions. It is characterized by its focus on values and the clash of ideas, making it distinct from other forms of debate that prioritize policy analysis and implementation. The format encourages debaters to engage with fundamental questions about morality and justice.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. Lincoln-Douglas debate was named after the famous debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas in 1858, which focused on issues like slavery and human rights.
2. The format typically features alternating speeches: the affirmative constructive, negative constructive, rebuttals, and final focus speeches.
3. Judges in Lincoln-Douglas debates evaluate based on both content and style, looking for clarity, persuasiveness, and depth of argumentation.
4. The typical time allocation for each speech in Lincoln-Douglas debate includes 6 minutes for constructive speeches, 3 minutes for rebuttals, and 2 minutes for final focus speeches.
5. Lincoln-Douglas debates often challenge participants to connect abstract values to real-world implications, enhancing their critical thinking and public speaking skills.

Review Questions

• How does the focus on values in Lincoln-Douglas debate differentiate it from other debate formats?
  • In Lincoln-Douglas debate, the emphasis on values sets it apart from formats like policy debate, which tends to focus on specific policies and their implementation. The one-on-one nature of 'ld' allows for a deeper exploration of ethical and philosophical questions, fostering critical thinking about morality. Debaters must argue not just for a position but also articulate why their values matter in assessing the resolution.
• Discuss the significance of the Value Criterion in determining the outcome of a Lincoln-Douglas debate round.
  • The Value Criterion is crucial in Lincoln-Douglas debate as it provides a framework for evaluating arguments. Each debater presents their Value Criterion alongside their case, which serves as a lens through which judges assess which side more effectively upholds important values. This helps clarify the criteria by which the round should be judged, allowing for a structured comparison of how each debater supports their respective positions.
• Evaluate the impact of time management on success in Lincoln-Douglas debate and how debaters can utilize it effectively.
  • Time management is essential in Lincoln-Douglas debate because each debater must deliver a persuasive argument within strict time limits. Successful debaters plan their speeches to ensure they cover all key points without running over time while allowing room for rebuttal responses. By strategically allocating time to each part of their argumentation process, debaters can effectively counter their opponent's claims while reinforcing their own, thereby maximizing their chances of winning the round.

Related terms

Value Criterion: A standard used in Lincoln-Douglas debate to evaluate which side better upholds a key value, guiding the judge's decision.

Resolution: The statement or proposition being debated in Lincoln-Douglas debate, typically phrased as a value proposition that the affirmative must affirm.

Constructive: The initial speeches given by both debaters where they present their main arguments and framework for the round.