study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Qualitative interviews

from class:

Public Health Ethics

Definition

Qualitative interviews are a research method used to gather in-depth insights and understanding of individuals' experiences, beliefs, and perspectives through open-ended questions. This approach allows for the exploration of complex topics, such as discrimination and stigma, by providing a platform for participants to express their thoughts and feelings in their own words, which can reveal nuanced information that quantitative methods may overlook.

congrats on reading the definition of qualitative interviews. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Qualitative interviews help uncover personal stories that illustrate how discrimination and stigma affect individuals in real life.
  2. This method emphasizes the subjective experiences of participants, making it particularly useful in understanding marginalized groups who may face discrimination.
  3. Interviewers can adapt questions based on participants' responses, allowing for deeper exploration of relevant issues related to stigma.
  4. The flexibility of qualitative interviews can lead to unexpected findings that provide richer insights into public health challenges.
  5. Analysis of qualitative interview data often involves coding responses to identify recurring themes related to discrimination and stigma.

Review Questions

  • How do qualitative interviews enhance our understanding of discrimination and stigma in public health?
    • Qualitative interviews enhance our understanding of discrimination and stigma by providing rich, detailed narratives that illustrate personal experiences. Participants can share their thoughts and feelings openly, revealing the complexities of their situations that statistics alone may not capture. This depth of understanding helps public health professionals identify the root causes of stigma and develop more effective interventions tailored to affected populations.
  • Discuss the advantages of using qualitative interviews over quantitative methods when researching stigma in public health.
    • Qualitative interviews offer several advantages over quantitative methods when researching stigma, such as allowing for greater depth in understanding individual experiences. They facilitate open discussions where participants can elaborate on their thoughts, revealing insights into how stigma affects their lives. Additionally, qualitative methods can adapt to the flow of conversation, enabling researchers to explore unexpected themes that may arise during discussions, which would not be possible with fixed-response surveys.
  • Evaluate the impact of qualitative interviews on developing interventions aimed at reducing stigma in public health settings.
    • Qualitative interviews significantly impact the development of interventions aimed at reducing stigma by providing critical insights into the lived experiences of those affected. By understanding personal narratives and the nuances behind stigma, public health professionals can tailor interventions that directly address the concerns and needs expressed by participants. This approach fosters community engagement and ensures that solutions are culturally sensitive and relevant, ultimately leading to more effective outcomes in combating discrimination.

"Qualitative interviews" also found in:

Subjects (65)

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.