🇺🇸ap us history review

Scopes Monkey Trial

Written by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated September 2025
Verified for the 2026 exam
Verified for the 2026 examWritten by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated September 2025

Definition

The Scopes Monkey Trial was a landmark legal case in 1925 in which high school teacher John T. Scopes was accused of violating Tennessee's Butler Act by teaching Charles Darwin's theory of evolution. This trial highlighted the intense cultural clash between modern science and traditional religious beliefs during the 1920s, symbolizing the broader conflict over education, science, and religion in America.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. The trial took place in Dayton, Tennessee, and garnered national attention, becoming a media sensation with widespread coverage and debates about education and science.
  2. John T. Scopes was defended by famed attorney Clarence Darrow, while former presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan served as the prosecution's key witness.
  3. The trial resulted in Scopes being found guilty and fined $100, although the conviction was later overturned on a technicality.
  4. The Scopes Monkey Trial represented a significant moment in the debate over science vs. religion, reflecting the tensions of the Roaring Twenties as society grappled with modernity.
  5. Despite its outcome, the trial marked a turning point in public opinion regarding teaching evolution, leading to more discussions on academic freedom and the role of religion in education.

Review Questions

  • What were the main arguments presented by both sides during the Scopes Monkey Trial?
    • During the Scopes Monkey Trial, the prosecution argued that John T. Scopes violated the Butler Act by teaching evolution, asserting that this undermined biblical teachings. The defense, led by Clarence Darrow, contended that scientific inquiry should be protected within educational institutions and highlighted the importance of academic freedom. Both sides used experts to challenge each other's views on science and religion, making the trial not just about one teacher's actions but about broader societal values.
  • Discuss how the Scopes Monkey Trial reflected the cultural tensions of the 1920s between modernity and tradition.
    • The Scopes Monkey Trial exemplified the cultural tensions of the 1920s as it showcased the clash between modern scientific theories and traditional religious beliefs. On one hand, proponents of evolution represented a growing acceptance of modernity and scientific advancement. Conversely, fundamentalists viewed this acceptance as a threat to moral values and religious teachings. The trial became a battleground for these competing ideologies, symbolizing the struggle between progressivism and conservatism in American society during this transformative decade.
  • Evaluate the long-term implications of the Scopes Monkey Trial on education and public policy regarding evolution in American schools.
    • The long-term implications of the Scopes Monkey Trial on education and public policy were significant, as it set a precedent for ongoing debates about teaching evolution versus creationism in schools. While Scopes was convicted initially, the trial sparked greater advocacy for academic freedom and critical thinking in education. Over time, as societal views shifted towards accepting evolutionary theory as part of science education, legal battles continued to emerge over curriculum content, culminating in landmark cases like Edwards v. Aguillard in 1987. Thus, the trial laid essential groundwork for how science and religion would be navigated within public education in America.

"Scopes Monkey Trial" also found in: