👩🏾‍⚖️ap us government review

Federalist 70

Written by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated September 2025
Verified for the 2026 exam
Verified for the 2026 examWritten by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated September 2025

Definition

Federalist 70 is an essay written by Alexander Hamilton, published in 1788, which argues for a strong executive leader in the new government of the United States. Hamilton emphasizes the necessity of energy in the executive branch, suggesting that a single president is more effective and accountable than a plural executive. This essay is part of The Federalist Papers, which were crucial in promoting the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.

Pep mascot

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Hamilton argues that a strong executive is essential for good governance, as it allows for decisive action in times of crisis.
  2. He believes that a single president can provide clearer accountability to the public compared to multiple executives sharing power.
  3. The essay discusses how energy in the executive is necessary for effective governance, including elements like unity, duration, and adequate provision for support.
  4. Hamilton refutes concerns about the potential for tyranny by asserting that a strong executive can be effectively checked by the legislative and judicial branches.
  5. Federalist 70 has had a lasting impact on American political thought, reinforcing the importance of a robust executive branch within the framework of the Constitution.

Review Questions

  • How does Federalist 70 justify the need for a strong executive branch in terms of governance?
    • Federalist 70 justifies the need for a strong executive branch by arguing that energy in the executive is vital for good governance. Hamilton believes that a single president can act decisively and efficiently, especially during emergencies, providing clear leadership and accountability. This ensures that important decisions can be made quickly and effectively without being bogged down by disagreements among multiple leaders.
  • What arguments does Hamilton make against a plural executive as discussed in Federalist 70?
    • In Federalist 70, Hamilton argues against a plural executive by emphasizing that it would lead to confusion and inefficiency in decision-making. He points out that having multiple leaders could result in disagreement and paralysis during critical moments when swift action is needed. Hamilton asserts that a singular leader is more accountable to the public and can foster clearer direction and responsibility within the government.
  • Evaluate the implications of Federalist 70 on modern interpretations of executive power in the United States.
    • Federalist 70 has significant implications for modern interpretations of executive power as it underlines the necessity of an energetic and decisive leader within the U.S. government. The essay influences current debates regarding presidential authority, especially in times of national crises when quick decision-making is critical. Additionally, Hamilton's emphasis on accountability shapes discussions on checks and balances, highlighting how a strong executive must still operate within a framework that prevents abuse of power while ensuring effective governance.

"Federalist 70" also found in: