Brutus 1 is one of the series of essays known as the Anti-Federalist Papers, written to oppose the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. It argued that a large republic would threaten states' rights and individual liberties.
Think of Brutus 1 like a movie critic who gives a negative review to a blockbuster film (the U.S. Constitution). The critic believes that while the film may have some good points, it's too big and complex for its own good, potentially overshadowing smaller indie films (states' rights) and individual viewers' tastes (individual liberties).
Federalist Papers: A collection of essays written in favor of the U.S. Constitution's ratification, arguing for a strong central government.
States' Rights: The idea that states should retain significant power and autonomy without excessive control from federal government.
Individual Liberties: Basic rights and freedoms guaranteed to individuals as protection from any arbitrary actions or laws by the government.
What is the main concern expressed by Brutus 1 about the proposed Constitution?
According to the arguments in Federalist No. 10 and Brutus 1, what is considered the greatest source of political conflict?
What is the primary concern of Brutus 1 regarding the proposed Constitution?
What might have happened if the arguments of Brutus 1 were more convincing to the citizens than those of Madison's Federalist No.10 during constitutional debates?
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.